Why is this a definition of the partition function?

In summary, the partition function for a single quantum particle of mass m in a volume V can be calculated for two particles if they are bosons or fermions. In the case of bosons, the wave state must be symmetric, while for fermions, it must be antisymmetric. The definition of the partition function is based on a formal analogy from classical statistical physics and is calculated by summing the probabilities of eigenstates.
  • #1
VortexLattice
146
0
Hi everyone, I'm working through an example in my textbook, and it's making very little sense to me. The problem is:

Let [itex]Z_1(m)[/itex] be the partition function for a single quantum particle of mass m in a volume V. First, calculate the partition function for two of these particles if they are bosons (and then also for fermions).

So, it tells me earlier in the chapter that, for bosons for example, the wave state has to be symmetric. So, for two particles (a and b) in "plane wave states" [itex]k_1[/itex] and [itex]k_2[/itex] where the energy for a plane wave state k is [itex]E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}[/itex], the total state is [itex]\left|k_1,k_2\right\rangle = \frac{\left|k_1\right\rangle \left|k_2\right\rangle - \left|k_2\right\rangle \left|k_1\right\rangle}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex] (for k1 not equal to k2. For k1=k2, it's just [itex]\left|k_1\right\rangle \left|k_2\right\rangle[/itex])

I guess I understand that. A plane wave (let's just say 1D, along the x axis) is of the form [itex]e^{ikx}[/itex], so in this case, the total state would be (in the position basis)

[tex]\left|k_1,k_2\right\rangle = \frac{e^{ik_1x_a}e^{ik_2x_b} - e^{ik_1x_b}e^{ik_2x_a}}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex]

Is that right?

Anyway, my real trouble is next. I think I'm trying to do it more rigorously than I have to, but I want to understand this explicitly. So, for bosons, they say

[tex]Z_2 = tr(e^{-βH})[/tex], where tr() is the trace of a matrix. Now, they never really tell us why this is, earlier in the book. They just seem to introduce it randomly. Could anyone tell me why this is a definition of the partition function?

Anyway, I'll trust this for now. Going on, they say:

[tex]tr(e^{-βH}) = \sum_{k_1,k_2} \left\langle k_1,k_2\right|e^{-βH}\left|k_1,k_2\right\rangle = \sum_{k_1>k_2}\frac{\left\langle k_1 \right|\left\langle k_2\right| + \left\langle k_2 \right|\left\langle k_1\right|}{\sqrt{2}}e^{-βH}\frac{\left|k_1 \right\rangle \left| k_2\right\rangle + \left| k_2\right\rangle\left|k_1\right\rangle}{\sqrt{2}} + \sum_{k}\left\langle k \right|\left\langle k\right|e^{-βH}\left|k \right\rangle \left| k\right\rangle[/tex]

So this is just expanding from before. Now, the Hamiltonian acts on the product kets to the right, and because they both have the same pair of k values, produces the same thing, [itex]e^{-\frac{\beta\hbar^2}{2m}(k_1^2 + k_2^2)}[/itex] for the first sum and [itex]e^{-\frac{2\beta\hbar^2}{2m}k^2}[/itex] for the 2nd one.

So it seems like we now get

[tex]\sum_{k_1>k_2}e^{-\frac{\beta\hbar^2}{2m}(k_1^2 + k_2^2)}(\frac{\left\langle k_1 \right|\left\langle k_2\right| + \left\langle k_2 \right|\left\langle k_1\right|}{\sqrt{2}})(\frac{\left|k_1 \right\rangle \left| k_2\right\rangle + \left| k_2\right\rangle\left|k_1\right\rangle}{\sqrt{2}}) + \sum_{k}e^{-\frac{2\beta\hbar^2}{2m}k^2}(\left\langle k \right|\left\langle k\right|)(\left|k \right\rangle \left| k \right\rangle)[/tex]

So it seems to me that in the first sum, only two of those products (when you foil out the terms inside the parentheses) are nonzero. So that cancels the sqrt(2)'s on the bottom. In the right, it seems like it's just 1. Is this right?

Then, in the book, they change the indices of the first sum from k1>k2 to k1,k2 and add a factor of 1/2 in front of the sum, as is standard. However, they do the same for the second sum, but I don't see why. The second one is just going over all k, so there is no double counting, right?

Anyway, both of these sums are now basically some variation of the individual partition function (I see this part easily). So they finally get

[tex]Z = \frac{1}{2}[Z_1^2(m) + Z_1(m/2)][/tex]

The fermi one confuses me even more, but I'll be brief with it. Basically, the first step of setting up the PF as the trace of the exponent is the same, and they plug in the antisymmetric state. But here the ones where k1=k2 should be zero, unlike the bosons. Still, they somehow end up with a sum over k, where they mysteriously skip a bunch of steps. Could anyone explain this to me?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In the beginning of your post, you say that you calculate for bosons and the state has to be symmetric, but you use antisymmetric functions (minus in your formula). You should use sums of products, not their difference.

Could anyone tell me why this is a definition of the partition function?

It is a definition based on formal analogy from classical statistical physics.

There the probability that variables of Hamiltonian system are in some small volume element dqdp is

[tex]
\rho(p,q) dpdq = \frac{e^{-\beta H(p,q)}}{Z},
[/tex]

where Z is some constant. Because total probability is 1, it is immediate that

[tex]
Z = \int e^{-\beta H(p,q)} dpdq,
[/tex]

This Z, when taken as a function of temperature and volume, is called the partition function.



In quantum statistical physics, things are very different. The density matrix in the basis of Hamiltonian eigenvectors is supposed to be

[tex]
\rho_{kl} = \frac{e^{-\beta E_k}}{A} \delta_{kl},
[/tex]

(A is some constant). Considering the meaning of density matrix, its form looks AS IF it corresponded to a system which has probability [itex]e^{-\beta E_k}/A[/itex] that it is in a state described by the k-th eigenvector of the Hamiltonian.

Since the diagonal sum of the density matrix (total probability) has to be 1, it follows that

[tex]
A = \sum_k e^{-\beta E_k} = Tr(e^{-\beta H}).
[/tex]

Thus instead of INTEGRATING the PROBABILITY DENSITY, in quantum theory people SUM the PROBABILITIES of eigenstates and the result is called again partition function.
 

Related to Why is this a definition of the partition function?

1. What is a quantum ideal gas?

A quantum ideal gas is a theoretical model used in physics to describe the behavior of a large number of particles in a confined space. It takes into account the principles of quantum mechanics, such as the uncertainty principle, to explain the properties of the gas at a microscopic level.

2. How does a quantum ideal gas differ from a classical ideal gas?

Unlike a classical ideal gas, which assumes particles have no volume and do not interact with each other, a quantum ideal gas considers the finite size and interactions between particles. This leads to different predictions for properties such as pressure and energy.

3. What is the relation between temperature and energy in a quantum ideal gas?

In a quantum ideal gas, the temperature is directly proportional to the average energy per particle. This means that as the temperature increases, the energy of each particle also increases. However, due to the principles of quantum mechanics, the energy levels of individual particles are discrete rather than continuous.

4. How does the behavior of a quantum ideal gas change at low temperatures?

At low temperatures, the quantum behavior of particles becomes more significant, leading to phenomena such as Bose-Einstein condensation. This is when a large number of particles occupy the same quantum energy state, resulting in unique properties of the gas, such as superfluidity.

5. What are some real-world applications of studying quantum ideal gases?

Understanding quantum ideal gases has important applications in fields such as astrophysics, where it can help explain the behavior of matter in extreme conditions such as neutron stars. It is also relevant in developing new technologies, such as quantum computers, which rely on the principles of quantum mechanics to function.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
657
Replies
1
Views
984
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
595
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
31
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
606
Replies
3
Views
811
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
803
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
969
Back
Top