Why is the strong nuclear force the strongest of the four fundamental forces?

In summary, the strong force is the strongest force at the atomic level, responsible for holding together the nucleus of an atom. It does not follow the inverse square law and its strength does not drop off with distance, leading to something called "color confinement". The strong force works against the repulsion of protons and is aided by the Pauli exclusion principle. The electromagnetic force also plays a role, but is only dominant at large scales. Overall, the combination of these forces creates a net attraction between particles within the nucleus.
  • #1
avito009
184
4
Is more force required at smaller distances like the nucleous of an atom? Since strong force applies itself at the level of the atom does that prove that more force is required at smaller distances to attract according to the inverse square law? Does strong nuclear force obey the inverse square law?

Or

The force of strong nuclear force is more because it has to work against the repulsion of the protons? (Due to electromagnetic force).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
We don't know why the strong force (also known as the color force) is the strongest. It's just the way it is.
The strong force does not follow the inverse square law. In fact, its strength doesn't drop off at all with distance, leading to something called "color confinement": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_confinement
 
  • #3
Drakkith said:
We don't know why the strong force (also known as the color force) is the strongest. It's just the way it is.
The strong force does not follow the inverse square law. In fact, its strength doesn't drop off at all with distance, leading to something called "color confinement": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_confinement
I'm hardly an expert, but I don't think avito009 was asking about colour force. The force between nucleons is, if I understand it correctly, a residual effect of the colour force, and as such it follows quite different rules than the colour force does.
For one, it's strength varies with distance quite substantially:
350px-Nuclear_force.png

(from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force)

avito009 said:
Is more force required at smaller distances like the nucleous of an atom? Since strong force applies itself at the level of the atom does that prove that more force is required at smaller distances to attract according to the inverse square law? Does strong nuclear force obey the inverse square law?

Or

The force of strong nuclear force is more because it has to work against the repulsion of the protons? (Due to electromagnetic force).
You're thinking about it backwards. No force "has to be" anything. They are what they are, and in combination with all the other forces they produces emergent structures like nucleons, atoms, molecules, planets etc.

Having said that, on the scale of an atom, the gravitational force is completely negligible, the weak force is only rarely in play, and the two forces that determine the structure of an atom are electromagnetic and strong, as well as the Pauli exclusion principle.
The EM force is long-range(falling at inverse square of distance), while the strong force is very stongly attractive at close range, quickly falling in strength as shown on the graph above.
The repulsive effect starting at about 0.8 fm is due to Pauli's. EM dominates the interaction when a nucleus gets too large, leading to unstability(radioactive decay).
If a nucleus is small, the strong force holds the constituent protons and neutrons against the EM repulsion of protons, while Pauli exclusion principle doesn't allow the nucleus to collapse to an even more tightly bound state.
 
  • #4
Bandersnatch said:
I'm hardly an expert, but I don't think avito009 was asking about colour force.

The nuclear force is not one of the 4 fundamental forces, but perhaps you are right and he wasn't asking about the color force.
 
  • #5
Bandersnatch said:

It's a shame that picture doesn't appear to show the 'signs of both forces' and thus how the electric and nuclear forces act together so that lower (potential well) curve is greater in magnitude than the repulsive (++ charges of protons) curve value - producing net attraction. Why just show the magnitude of FI?
 
  • #6
sophiecentaur said:
It's a shame that picture doesn't appear to show the 'signs of both forces' and thus how the electric and nuclear forces act together so that lower (potential well) curve is greater in magnitude than the repulsive (++ charges of protons) curve value - producing net attraction. Why just show the magnitude of FI?
Yeah, this one seems much better:
http://www.boredofstudies.org/wiki/images/b/bb/Sci_phys_quanta_strong_force.png
 
  • #7
I love it. Couldn't find one as good as that in the brief search I tried.
 

Related to Why is the strong nuclear force the strongest of the four fundamental forces?

1. Why is the strong nuclear force considered the strongest of the four fundamental forces?

The strong nuclear force is considered the strongest of the four fundamental forces because it has the highest level of strength among all the forces. This means that it is able to overcome the repulsive forces between positively charged particles within the nucleus, thus keeping the nucleus stable.

2. What makes the strong nuclear force stronger than the other fundamental forces?

The strong nuclear force is stronger than the other fundamental forces because it has a very short range of only about 10^-15 meters, which is limited to the size of the nucleus. This means that it only acts between particles that are very close to each other, allowing it to have a stronger effect compared to the other forces which have a longer range.

3. How does the strong nuclear force differ from the other fundamental forces?

The strong nuclear force differs from the other fundamental forces in several ways. Firstly, it only acts within the nucleus, while the other forces act on a larger scale. Additionally, it is able to overcome the repulsive forces between protons, while the other forces cannot. It also has a much shorter range compared to the other forces.

4. Can the strong nuclear force be explained by a mathematical formula?

Yes, the strong nuclear force can be explained by a mathematical formula known as the Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) theory. This theory describes the interactions between quarks and gluons, which are the particles that make up protons and neutrons. It has been successfully used to predict and explain the behavior of the strong nuclear force.

5. Is the strong nuclear force always the strongest force?

Yes, the strong nuclear force is always the strongest force within the nucleus. However, at very high energies and temperatures, such as those found in the early universe or in particle accelerators, the other fundamental forces can become stronger. This is due to the fact that at these extreme conditions, the strong nuclear force weakens and the other forces can take over.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
753
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top