Why does one coulomb equal 6.241 × 10^18 electrons?

In summary, the Coulomb is a measure of the charge that is produced by a current of 1 ampere flowing through a wire per second.
  • #1
Femme_physics
Gold Member
2,550
1
Just like the answer to mole is amount of atoms in 12 grams of carbon12. I wonder, is there a reason behind the amount of electrons in a coulomb?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Everything you can measure as a standard. For instance how do we define 1 gram? Or how do we define 1 second of time?

We define standards for measurements and then everything is based off of those standards. For instance the second is based off of the time it takes for a cesium atom to emit radiation like 9 billion times times.

If you'd like to read about electrical measurement standards:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0IKZ/is_1_106/ai_82777388/
 
  • #3
Well, I suppose my question is where this standard number came from... just like in the case of moles where we know it came from carbon-12. Or did someone just say "that seems like a fine huge random number!"
 
  • #4
Well, the ampere is define as "the constant current which will produce an attractive force of 2 × 10–7 Newton per metre of length between two straight, parallel conductors of infinite length and negligible circular cross section placed one metre apart in a vacuum" (wiki). The coulomb is then defined as the amount 1 ampere * 1 second.
 
  • #5
Got it!
 
  • #6
It's not a reason, but instead a best guess measurment based on how strong the elementary charge of one electron is (compared to a Coulomb). There a proposals to redefine a Coulomb based on the current best guess. If a Couloumb is redefined to be based on elementary charges, then a kilogram effectively becomes a derived unit.
 
  • #7
What Nabeshin said is correct. Did you know that the ampere is a fundamental base unit in the SI system and the Coulomb is not? Funny huh?
 
  • #8
Amok said:
What Nabeshin said is correct. Did you know that the ampere is a fundamental base unit in the SI system and the Coulomb is not? Funny huh?

Well, they don't really represent the same thing if I got it right. Coulomb is an amount, regardless of time. Whereas ampere is an amount with respect to time. So, they're not really convertible I think.
 
  • #9
Well yes, but that's the whole point. We usually say the A = C/s when actually we should say C = A*s. What I'm saying is that the Coulomb seems to be "more fundamental", but it was actually defined with respect to some current (what Nabeshin said), hence the strange numbers.

And about the mole question, you answered it yourself. Take any element in the periodic table of elements, if you know its atomic mass, then you also know its molar mass in g/mol! How easy is that? Some textbooks I've seen feature pound-moles (lb-mol), so that you know that a pound-mole of carbon atoms weighs 12 pounds (which means that a lb-mol is a larger number than a mole).

EDIT: you might enjoy this article :

http://www.economist.com/node/18007494
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Femme_physics said:
Well, they don't really represent the same thing if I got it right. Coulomb is an amount, regardless of time. Whereas ampere is an amount with respect to time. So, they're not really convertible I think.
Amok wasn't trying to say they are the same. The thing is, we are free to choose one quantity, and only one, in electromagnetism for the purpose of defining all electromagnetic units. Much as one defines the meter, second, and kilogram as base units, and then the units for velocity (m/s), force (Newtons = kg*m/s2), etc. are all defined in terms of just the base units.

Likewise, we could choose the Coulomb as a base unit, and then define an Ampere as the current due to 1 Coulomb flowing through a wire per second. But instead, the Ampere is chosen as the base unit, and a Coulomb is defined as the charge produced by a 1 Ampere current in 1 second. (There is actually a good reason for doing it this way.)

Amok said:
And about the mole question, you answered it yourself...
Actually, she wasn't really asking about the mole. Just using it for comparison purposes, asking if there was perhaps a similar relation between the Coulomb and the electron charge. At least I think that was Femme_physics's intent.
 

Related to Why does one coulomb equal 6.241 × 10^18 electrons?

1. Why is the number of electrons in one coulomb so large?

One coulomb is equal to 6.241 × 10^18 electrons because of the fundamental charge of an electron, which is 1.602 × 10^-19 coulombs. This means that to make one coulomb of charge, it takes a large number of electrons, in this case 6.241 × 10^18.

2. How was the value of one coulomb determined?

The value of one coulomb was determined through experimentation and measurement. Scientists conducted experiments to determine the amount of charge carried by a single electron and then used this value to calculate the number of electrons needed to make one coulomb of charge.

3. Is one coulomb of charge always equal to the same number of electrons?

Yes, one coulomb of charge is always equal to the same number of electrons, which is 6.241 × 10^18. This is because the fundamental charge of an electron is a constant value and cannot change.

4. How is the concept of a coulomb related to electricity?

The coulomb is a unit of measurement for electric charge. It is used to measure the amount of charge that is flowing in an electric circuit or stored in an object. The larger the number of coulombs, the greater the amount of electric charge present.

5. Can one coulomb of charge be divided into smaller units?

Yes, one coulomb of charge can be divided into smaller units such as milli-coulombs or micro-coulombs. This is similar to how we can divide one meter into centimeters or millimeters. However, the fundamental charge of an electron will always remain the same, regardless of the unit used to measure it.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
926
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
855
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top