Who First Described Wave Propagation Through Medium Disturbance?

  • Thread starter Haibane
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Figure
In summary: There are several Nobel Prize-winning physicists who have studied the topic of wave propagation, so it's definitely worth exploring.
  • #1
Haibane
5
0

Homework Statement



Was performing the online "reading questions" for my Physics 2 course. And I came to this question.

"A wave is not a material thing but a disturbance moving through a medium. The way that it propagates is that every part of the medium it encounters begins to vibrate in time with the wave and therefore with the original cause of the disturbance. Each part of the medium which is set to vibrating thereby becomes a new source of the wave and new waves radiate outwards from it in all directions. This idea is known as:"

Now after reading through the chapter a few times, I've not been able to see the mention of any laws, or statements that really seem to match this.

Any idea on where I may find such information?



Homework Equations


Possible choices in this case.

Newton's conjecture
Einstein's hypothesis
Hyghen's principle
Maxwell's proposal
Faraday's paradox



The Attempt at a Solution



If I recall correctly. Einsteins hypothesis referred to the idea of the moving of electric, and magnetic fields in parralel. While Faraday's Paradox has to do with magnetism.

I'm thinking it may be Hyghen's principle as it refers to the idea of light radiating in all directions. But at least as read, it doesn't make any mention about the part which might refer to the idea of the object vibrating in synch and thus appearing to become the source of the waves being emitted.


Can I get some help with this, or at least be pointed in the right direction?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is indeed Huygens' Principle. The last sentence, viz., "Each part of the medium which is set to vibrating thereby becomes a new source of the wave and new waves radiate outwards from it in all directions," should convince you.
 
  • #3
Okey, I thought so as I was thinking about it. But wanted to make sure I was not incorrect in this. Since every point counts in the class, hehe.

Thank you for your help :)
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Unexplained contradiction/paradox?

Long ago I somewhere read, that Huygens principle implied an unexplained
contradiction: Obviously no part of the newborn sum of concentric waves
at wavefront go backwards toward original source. There are no "backward waves", as should be if Huygens principle was really true. :confused:

There are also some other "paradoxes" concerning wave propagation - but life becomes easier if not bothering this too much. Mostly issues for future
Nobel Prize winners to dwell into ? :cool:
 

Related to Who First Described Wave Propagation Through Medium Disturbance?

1. Who proposed this statement?

This is a common question when trying to determine the origin of a statement. It is important to know who came up with the idea in order to give proper credit and understand the context of the statement.

2. What is the evidence behind this statement?

Scientists are always looking for evidence to support or refute a statement. This question is important in determining the validity and credibility of a statement.

3. Has this statement been tested or studied before?

Before accepting a statement, scientists often want to know if it has been previously studied or tested. This helps to determine if the statement has been scientifically proven or if further research is needed.

4. Are there any conflicting statements or theories?

In the scientific community, it is common for there to be multiple theories or statements on a particular topic. This question helps to identify any conflicting ideas and allows for further exploration and discussion.

5. How does this statement contribute to our understanding of the topic?

This question is important in determining the significance of a statement. Scientists are always looking to expand our knowledge and understanding, so understanding the contribution of a statement is crucial in evaluating its importance.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
Back
Top