Which of the two logarithms is larger: log_7 (10) or log_11 (13)

  • MHB
  • Thread starter anemone
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Logarithms
In summary: Without using a calculator, prove which of the following is larger:\log_7 10 or \log_{11} 13In summary, using logarithms to base 10, $\log_7 10$ is larger than $\log_{11} 13$ if the inequality $\log10\cdot \log11 > \log7\cdot \log13$ holds. By examining the values of $\log10$ and $\log11$, it can be seen that the left side of the inequality is greater than 1. By considering the values of $7^7$ and $13^7$, it can be shown that the right side of the inequality is less than 1. Therefore, the inequality
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Without using a calculator, prove which of the following is larger:

\(\displaystyle \log_7 10\) or \(\displaystyle \log_{11} 13\)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
anemone said:
Without using a calculator, prove which of the following is larger:

\(\displaystyle \log_7 10\) or \(\displaystyle \log_{11} 13\)
[sp]Using logs to base 10, $\log_7 10 = \dfrac{\log10}{\log7}$ and $\log_{11}13 = \dfrac{\log13}{\log11}.$ If $$\log10\cdot \log11 > \log7\cdot \log13\qquad(*)$$ then it will follow that $\log_7 10 > \log_{11} 13$.

Since $\log10 = 1$ and $\log11>1$, the left side of (*) is greater than $1$. To see that the right side of (*) is less than $1$, notice that $7^7 = 823543 < 10^6$ and $13^7 = 62748517 < 10^8$. (In principle, you could get those results by repeated multiplication without using a calculator, though I admit that I cheated there.) Therefore $7\log7<6$ and $7\log13<8$, and so $$\log7\cdot \log13 <\frac67\cdot\frac87 = \frac{48}{49} < 1,$$ which shows that the inequality (*) holds.[/sp]
 
  • #3
anemone said:
Without using a calculator, prove which of the following is larger:

\(\displaystyle \log_7 10\) or \(\displaystyle \log_{11} 13\)

Third Grader, non-general Solution. :-)
[sp]I want this to be WAY easier.

10/7 = 1 + ~43% (no calculator required)

13/11 = 1 + ~18% (no calculator required)

It's going to take A LOT more work to get 43% out of 7 than is required to get 18% out of 11.

No doubt, other examples would be less clear to my third grade friend.[/sp]
 
  • #4
My solution:

In much the same way as Chris, I got to the point where I needed to show:

\(\displaystyle 1>\log(7)\log(13)=\log(10-3)\log(10+3)\)

Note: I am using the notation \(\displaystyle \log(x)=\log_{10}(x)\).

Now, obviously:

\(\displaystyle \log(10-3)<1\) and \(\displaystyle \log(10+3)>1\)

And given the fact that the rate of change of log functions varies inversely as their argument, we could choose to write:

\(\displaystyle \log(13)=1+x\)

\(\displaystyle \log(7)=1-(x+y)\)

where \(x,y>0\)

And so our inequality becomes:

\(\displaystyle 1>(1-(x+y))(1+x)=1-(y+x^2+xy)\)

or:

\(\displaystyle 0<y+x^2+xy\)

As \(x\) and \(y\) are both defined to be positive, the result follows.
 
  • #5
Thanks to Opalg and MarkFL for participating and for the two insightful solutions!

Now, @tkhunny, I am afraid you have to walk me through your solution...

My solution:
First, we assume that \(\displaystyle \log_7 10>\log_{11} 13\) is true. By changing the base-7 and base-11 logarithms to base-10 logarithms, we have

\(\displaystyle \begin{align*}\frac{\log_{10} 10}{\log_{10} 7}&>\frac{\log_{10} 13}{\log_{10} 11}\\ \frac{1}{\log_{10} 7}&>\frac{\log_{10} 13}{\log_{10} 11}\\ \log_{10} 11&>\log_{10} 7\log_{10} 13\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{(since }\log_{10} x>0\,\,\, \text{for all}\,\,x>1)\end{align*}\)

We can see that \(\displaystyle \log_{10} 11>1\) as \(\displaystyle 11>10\). So, if we can prove \(\displaystyle 1>\log_{10} 7\log_{10} 13\), we are done.

Observe that by the AM-GM inequality, we have

\(\displaystyle \sqrt{\log_{10} 7\log_{10} 13}<\frac{\log_{10} 7+\log_{10} 13}{2}=\frac{\log_{10} (7(13))}{2}=\frac{\log_{10} 91}{2}<\frac{\log_{10} 100}{2}=1\\\implies 1>\log_{10} 7\log_{10} 13\)

The proof is then followed.
 
  • #6
anemone said:
Now, @tkhunny, I am afraid you have to walk me through your solution...

I just wondered if there were a range over which we could simply ignore the logarithms.

There appears to be such a range, but the non-calculator premise may be violated when making the less vague impression.
 

Attachments

  • Happening.jpg
    Happening.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 77
  • Uniform.jpg
    Uniform.jpg
    12.7 KB · Views: 66
  • #7
anemone said:
Without using a calculator, prove which of the following is larger:

\(\displaystyle \log_7 10\) or \(\displaystyle \log_{11} 13\)

we have $10 > 7 * 1.4$ and $13 < 11 * 1.4$
hence $log_7 \,10 > 1 + log_7 \,1.4$ and $log_{11} \,13 = 1 + log_{11} \,1.4$
so $log_7\,10 > 1 + log_7 \,1.4 > 1 + log_{11} \,1.4 > log_{11} \,13$ as $log_7 \,1.4 > log_{11} \,1.4$
hence $log_7\,10 > log_{11} \,13$
 

Related to Which of the two logarithms is larger: log_7 (10) or log_11 (13)

1. What is the difference between log7(10) and log11(13)?

The difference between log7(10) and log11(13) is that they have different bases. Logarithms with different bases cannot be directly compared, as they represent different scales of measurement.

2. How can I compare log7(10) and log11(13)?

In order to compare logarithms with different bases, you can use the change of base formula: loga(x) = logb(x) / logb(a). This will allow you to convert both logarithms to a common base and compare them.

3. Which of the two logarithms is larger: log7(10) or log11(13)?

Without converting the logarithms to a common base, it is impossible to determine which one is larger. However, using the change of base formula, log7(10) can be converted to log11(10) and compared to log11(13). From this comparison, it can be concluded that log11(13) is larger.

4. Can you explain why log11(13) is larger than log7(10)?

The reason log11(13) is larger than log7(10) is because 11 is a closer approximation to 10 than 7 is to 10. In other words, 11 is a better "fit" for the base 10 logarithm of 13 compared to 7. This means that log11(13) is a larger number than log7(10) when both are calculated to the same number of decimal places.

5. Is there a general rule for comparing logarithms with different bases?

There is no general rule for comparing logarithms with different bases. The best way to compare them is to use the change of base formula and convert them to a common base. However, it is important to note that the larger the base, the smaller the logarithm will be, and vice versa. This means that a logarithm with a larger base will be a smaller number compared to a logarithm with a smaller base when both are calculated to the same number of decimal places.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
949
  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
852
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
933
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top