When is a propagator on shell?

In summary, the conversation discusses the confusion about whether a system needs to be considered as being on shell and if all propagators in the diagram must also be on shell. The speaker mentions that after a Wick rotation, the imaginary component in the denominator can be neglected, but there may be cases where it cannot be ignored. They also mention that after using Feynman parameterization, the imaginary part of the denominator can be disregarded after a Wick rotation.
  • #1
nolanp2
53
0
Hey all,

just a simple question that's confusing me about amplitudes for feynman diagrams. How do i know whether a system needs to be considered as being on shell, and hence has an imaginary component included in the denominator of the propagator?

If i have one propagator which is required to be on shell, does that mean all propagators in the diagram must now be on shell?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
heh I'm not sure. I do know that after a Wick rotation you ought to be able to neglect the imaginary component in the demoninator I think. maybe there are cases where even with a Wick rotation you can't neglect it. no wait after you take care of the demoninator with Feynman parameterization then after Wick rotation you should be able to ignore the imaginary part of the denominator.
 
  • #3


A propagator is considered to be on shell when it satisfies the mass-energy relationship of the particle it represents. In other words, the energy and momentum of the particle must be equal to its mass, as dictated by the relativistic dispersion relation. This is necessary for the propagator to accurately describe the behavior of the particle in the given system.

Whether or not a system needs to be considered on shell depends on the specific context and the desired level of precision. In some cases, off-shell contributions may be negligible and can be ignored, while in others they may be crucial for the calculation.

If one propagator in a Feynman diagram is required to be on shell, it does not necessarily mean that all propagators in the diagram must also be on shell. Each propagator should be treated independently and considered in the context of the specific system being studied.

It is important to carefully consider which propagators need to be on shell in order to accurately describe the system, as including unnecessary on-shell conditions can complicate the calculation without adding any significant improvement to the result. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to include an on-shell condition for a propagator should be based on the physical significance and relevance to the system being studied.
 

Related to When is a propagator on shell?

1. What is a propagator on shell?

A propagator on shell refers to a mathematical quantity that describes the probability amplitude for a particle to propagate from one point to another in space and time.

2. When is a propagator on shell?

A propagator is considered to be on shell when it satisfies the equations of motion for a given theory, meaning that it is consistent with the laws of physics.

3. Why is it important to have a propagator on shell?

Having a propagator on shell ensures that the calculated probabilities are physically meaningful and in accordance with the principles of the theory being studied.

4. How is a propagator on shell calculated?

The calculation of a propagator on shell involves solving the equations of motion for a given theory and then using this solution to determine the amplitude for a particle to propagate from one point to another.

5. Can a propagator be off shell?

Yes, a propagator can be off shell if it does not satisfy the equations of motion for a given theory. This can occur in certain situations such as virtual particle interactions in quantum field theory.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
617
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
969
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
280
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
705
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top