What Speed Can a Cyclist Climb a Hill Using the Same Power as Descending?

In summary, the cyclist can descend a 4 degree hill at a steady speed of 6.0 km/h. Pumping hard, the cyclist can descend the hill at 30 km/h.
  • #1
skiboka33
59
0
A bicyclist of mass 80kg (including the bike) can coast down a 4 degree hill at a steady speed of 6.0 km/h. Pumping hard, the cyclist can descend the hill at 30 km/h. Using the same ower, at what speed can the cyclist climb the hill? Assume the force of friction is proportional to the square of the speed; that is, Ff = bv^2, where b is constant.

thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Check me on this, but can you say that when coasting downhill at 6 km/hr, the frictional force b * 6^2 is exactly equal (and opposite) to the effective force of gravity, which would be m * g * sin(4 deg)? If so, that would allow you to solve for b. If that is correct, then it would get you started on attacking the remainder of the problem.
 
  • #3
that is incorrect. Frictional Force is the static friction coefficient*Force Normal which is perpendicular to the surfuace. so when on an incline it is not equal to m*g.
 
  • #4
Jez,

I was thinking of it as a drag force, due mostly to wind resistance, but if you are correct in your post, then skiboka can throw my idea out the window, I guess.

I was thinking once skiboka had b figured, the next thing would be to calculate b * 30^2 to get the drag force at that speed, then subtract from it m * g * sin(4 deg) to get the force the rider is providing with his legs, and then multiply by the speed of 30 to get power.

Then for the uphill part of the problem, it would be a matter of finding speed v for which power required to go uphill at that speed plus power to overcome drag was equal to the power calculated previously.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
i was thinking of friction between the tires and the surface. hmmmm... now you got me thinking again.
 
  • #6
Jez said:
that is incorrect. Frictional Force is the static friction coefficient*Force Normal which is perpendicular to the surfuace. so when on an incline it is not equal to m*g.

I agree with Janitor. Since the wheels are rolling not sliding, the force of gravity projected along the incline equals the friction force from wind resistance. It's a safe bet to ignore friction in the bearings for this problem.
 
  • #7
ok i found b to be 1.52

then i found Fapplied = bv^2 - mgsin@ = .0309

then i found power = F * v = .927

so F required = Fg + Ff right? which = 54.7 + 1.52v^2
P = (54.7 + 1.52v^2)(v) = ?

now what? did i mess up somewhere?
 
  • #8
If you are going to work in MKS units, you need to convert 6 km/hr to m/s, which makes it 1.666 m/s. Thus, in MKS units, the value of b is actually 19.7. Then convert 30 km/ hr to m/s, which is 8.33 m/s. The force that the rider is applying to the bicycle going downhill is then 19.7 * 8.33^2 - 80 * 9.8 * 0.0697 = 1367 - 55 = 1312 Newtons. Power provided by the rider is 1312 * 8.33 = 10935 watts.

So the remainder of the problem is to find a value of v for which 10935 = b v^3 + v m g sin(4 deg). I get 8.1 m/s or 29 km/hr.

Note that I am approximating g as 9.8 m/sec^2. Maybe you have a more precise value of g to use.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Warning!

I calculated that the rider is capable of putting out 11 kilowatts. If you multiply kilowatts by 1.3 to get horsepower, that is 14 horsepower. That seems way too high, even for a short burst by human legs. So either the problem is not realistic, or I have goofed up. Check me carefully.
 
  • #12
Oops!

As I was posting the link, Doc Al was also doing that. :-p
 

Related to What Speed Can a Cyclist Climb a Hill Using the Same Power as Descending?

1. What is the relationship between energy and momentum?

The relationship between energy and momentum is that they are both conserved quantities in a closed system. This means that the total amount of energy and momentum in a system cannot be created or destroyed, but can only be transferred or transformed from one form to another.

2. How are energy and momentum related in a moving object?

In a moving object, the energy and momentum are directly proportional. This means that as the momentum of an object increases, so does its energy. This is because momentum is a measure of an object's motion, while energy is a measure of an object's ability to do work or cause change.

3. How does the conservation of energy and momentum apply to collisions?

In collisions, the total energy and momentum of the system before and after the collision must be the same. This means that if one object gains momentum and energy, the other object(s) involved must lose an equal amount. This is known as the principle of conservation of energy and momentum.

4. Why is the conservation of energy and momentum important in physics?

The conservation of energy and momentum is important in physics because it is a fundamental law of nature. It helps us understand and predict the behavior of objects and systems, and is essential in various fields such as mechanics, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism.

5. How can energy and momentum be transferred between objects?

Energy and momentum can be transferred between objects through various mechanisms such as collisions, radiation, and conduction. In collisions, the energy and momentum are directly transferred from one object to another. In radiation, energy is transferred through electromagnetic waves. In conduction, energy and momentum are transferred through physical contact between objects.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top