Exploring Black Holes: Uncovering the Mystery of Absolute Zero

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of a black hole, which is an object with an incredibly high density and strong gravity and magnetic fields. It is believed that black holes form when a mass reaches a critical value and collapses into a small volume. However, there are objections to this model, questioning why the same mass can have different characteristics depending on its volume. It is also debated whether black holes can be formed from something else or if they have existed since the beginning of the universe. The conversation also mentions the paradox of a black hole having strong gravity and magnetic fields without any visible mass. The speaker suggests that gravity and magnetic fields may not be a part of mass, but rather what mass is a part of.
  • #1
Michael F. Dmitriyev
342
1
It is accepted to consider BH as an object which on a reason of the achievement of its mass before a certain critical value (?) be subjected to collapse. This situation when in small volume does concentrated enormous mass with unbelievably enormous density of the material. Having the most strong gravity and magnetic field, BH attracts all objects falling into sphere of its influence. Nothing can not overcome BH's a gravity field including the Light . As a result, for observer this object looks black.
I have much objections against such a model.
The main is that it does not work.
Is not seen the reasons why the some mass manifests different characteristics depending on volume, which it occupies. If BH was a star earlier and suddenly became the size as orange for instance, then we can not observe it. If we observe it then it has a size of the star at least. If the object after collapse has a size of star, then is not understandable than it has been before one. There was galaxy? Why BH must be formed from something? Why it can not be such age as the universe and exist before the stars was formed? It is possible to ask more and more questions, but I think it is enough.
So.
What is Black Hole?
This is an object which contains NOTHING.
No fluctuations can not exist in BH.
Consequently no material containing mass (this fluctuations also), no EM fluctuations including the light. Even the background cosmic radiation is absent .
This object has a no real size. Time is in zero.

Black Hole is an ABSOLUTE ZERO.

"Obvious paradox" is present in this case - gravity and magnetic field under full absence of the mass.
This means that mass does contains in itself a certain substance which is general with one in BH. But BH does contains nothing. Absolutely zero importances of all known and unknown power and field only.
Consequently a zero importance is perceived by us as a most is possible, but that we can measure at least aproximately, mass of the star for instance, is perceived as a vastly smaller.
At the next time it happens to note - a people prefer to stand upon a head.
What substance has a such characteristic?
The TIME only.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Originally posted by Michael F. Dmitriyev
It is accepted to consider BH as an object which on a reason of the achievement of its mass before a certain critical value (?) be subjected to collapse. This situation when in small volume does concentrated enormous mass with unbelievably enormous density of the material. Having the most strong gravity and magnetic field, BH attracts all objects falling into sphere of its influence. Nothing can not overcome BH's a gravity field including the Light . As a result, for observer this object looks black.
I have much objections against such a model.
The main is that it does not work.
Is not seen the reasons why the some mass manifests different characteristics depending on volume, which it occupies. If BH was a star earlier and suddenly became the size as orange for instance, then we can not observe it. If we observe it then it has a size of the star at least. If the object after collapse has a size of star, then is not understandable than it has been before one. There was galaxy? Why BH must be formed from something? Why it can not be such age as the universe and exist before the stars was formed? It is possible to ask more and more questions, but I think it is enough.
So.
What is Black Hole?
This is an object which contains NOTHING.
No fluctuations can not exist in BH.
Consequently no material containing mass (this fluctuations also), no EM fluctuations including the light. Even the background cosmic radiation is absent .
This object has a no real size. Time is in zero.

Black Hole is an ABSOLUTE ZERO.

"Obvious paradox" is present in this case - gravity and magnetic field under full absence of the mass.
This means that mass does contains in itself a certain substance which is general with one in BH. But BH does contains nothing. Absolutely zero importances of all known and unknown power and field only.
Consequently a zero importance is perceived by us as a most is possible, but that we can measure at least aproximately, mass of the star for instance, is perceived as a vastly smaller.
At the next time it happens to note - a people prefer to stand upon a head.
What substance has a such characteristic?
The TIME only.

Greg says: "Obvious paradox" is present in this case - gravity and magnetic field under full absence of the mass. this should be a clue gravity and magnetic field are not part of mass. they are what mass is a part of. mass is made the same way mass is made when it approches 186000 mps
 
  • #3


Originally posted by greg
Greg says: "Obvious paradox" is present in this case - gravity and magnetic field under full absence of the mass. this should be a clue gravity and magnetic field are not part of mass. they are what mass is a part of. mass is made the same way mass is made when it approches 186000 mps
Not Greg says:
-"Obvious paradox" is present in this case -gravity and magnetic field under full absence of the mass.
It is me. Check out my post attentively.
I have offered the key which allows to explain all forces and phenomenas. This key is Time. The speed of the light you mentionned this manifestation of time also.
 
  • #4


Originally posted by Michael F. Dmitriyev
Not Greg says:
-"Obvious paradox" is present in this case -gravity and magnetic field under full absence of the mass.
It is me. Check out my post attentively.
I have offered the key which allows to explain all forces and phenomenas. This key is Time. The speed of the light you mentionned this manifestation of time also.

greg says: what is your definition of time?
 
  • #5


Originally posted by greg
greg says: what is your definition of time?
You hurry the events, Greg.
The definition of something can be made after considering of its manifestations in the existing phenomenas. In other words, for beginning it is necessary to define how it works. One of such topics is here.
"How time does work?" topic will here soon.
 

What is a black hole?

A black hole is a region of space where the gravitational pull is so strong that nothing, including light, can escape. It is formed when a massive star collapses under its own weight.

How do scientists study black holes?

Scientists study black holes through various methods such as observing their effects on nearby objects, analyzing the gravitational waves they produce, and using computer simulations to model their behavior.

What is absolute zero and how does it relate to black holes?

Absolute zero is the lowest possible temperature where all molecular motion stops. It is closely related to black holes because at the center of a black hole, known as the singularity, the gravitational pull and density are so high that it is believed to reach absolute zero.

Can anything escape a black hole?

Once something enters a black hole, it cannot escape. This is known as the event horizon, where the gravitational pull is so strong that the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light. However, some theories suggest that tiny particles such as Hawking radiation can escape a black hole.

What are some current theories about black holes?

There are several theories about black holes, including the general theory of relativity by Albert Einstein which explains their formation and behavior. Other theories include the information paradox, which suggests that information can be lost in a black hole, and the holographic principle, which suggests that all the information about a black hole is stored on its surface rather than inside it.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
996
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
48
Views
679
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
865
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
96
Views
4K
Replies
108
Views
17K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
14
Views
739
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
886
Back
Top