What is the limit of (2n+1)/(3n+7) as n approaches infinity?

  • Thread starter asset101
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Definition
In summary, to prove that lim((2n+ 1)/(3n+7)) = 2/3, we can express the expression as [(2n)(1+1/2n)]/[(3n)(1+7/3n)] and show that as n approaches infinity, the terms 1/2n and 7/3n approach 0, resulting in the limit of 2/3. This is a simple way of finding the limit, but it does not provide a proof from the definition.
  • #1
asset101
11
0
let an = [tex]\frac{(2n+1)}{(3n+7)}[/tex]. Prove direct from definition that an[tex]\rightarrow2/3[/tex].

Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ok … first step in a question like this is …

what is the definition of the statement "lim((2n+ 1)/(3n+7)) = 2/3"? :smile:
 
  • #3
Here's an idea... as long as n isn't zero, the following two things are the same:

(2n+1)/(3n+7) = [(2n)(1+1/2n)]/[(3n)(1+7/3n)]

What happens as the n's get bigger and bigger to the terms 1/2n and 7/3n?
 
  • #4
AUMathTutor said:
Here's an idea... as long as n isn't zero, the following two things are the same:

(2n+1)/(3n+7) = [(2n)(1+1/2n)]/[(3n)(1+7/3n)]

What happens as the n's get bigger and bigger to the terms 1/2n and 7/3n?
That's the simplest way of finding the limit but it doesn't "prove from the definition".
 

Related to What is the limit of (2n+1)/(3n+7) as n approaches infinity?

What is "prove direct from definition"?

"Prove direct from definition" is a scientific method used to validate a concept or idea by starting with its definition and logically deducing its properties and characteristics. It is a rigorous approach that relies on the fundamental principles of a concept to prove its validity.

How is "prove direct from definition" different from other methods of proof?

"Prove direct from definition" is different from other methods of proof, such as induction or deduction, because it starts with the definition of the concept rather than making assumptions or generalizations. It is a more systematic and structured approach that relies on the exact meaning of a concept to prove its properties.

What are the steps involved in "prove direct from definition"?

The steps involved in "prove direct from definition" include: 1) stating the definition of the concept, 2) identifying its fundamental principles, 3) using logic and reasoning to deduce its properties, and 4) providing evidence or examples to support the conclusions. These steps are repeated until the concept is fully validated.

What are the benefits of using "prove direct from definition"?

"Prove direct from definition" has several benefits, including providing a thorough understanding of a concept, ensuring its validity, and avoiding errors or fallacies. It also allows for a clear and precise communication of ideas and can serve as a foundation for further research and experimentation.

What are some examples of "prove direct from definition" in scientific research?

"Prove direct from definition" is commonly used in scientific research to validate theories and concepts. For example, in mathematics, the Pythagorean theorem can be proven directly from its definition of the relationship between the sides of a right triangle. In physics, the laws of motion can be proven directly from the definition of force and mass.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
220
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
934
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
985
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
882
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
420
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top