What is the accuracy of parking spacecraft into Lagrange points?

  • I
  • Thread starter RobbyQ
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Accuracy
In summary, the conversation discussed the accuracy needed to position a spacecraft into the Lagrange (L1, L2, L3) points and the instruments used to achieve this. There is a trade-off between staying close to the points and the fuel required, and sunlight is a major consideration as L2 is in the shadow of the Earth. The JWST orbits the L2 point, with a distance that varies between 250,000 to 832,000 km, and requires small corrections due to the unstable nature of the orbit. A video was also mentioned that explains the component forces involved in maintaining the orbit.
  • #1
RobbyQ
25
11
TL;DR Summary
What is the accuracy of parking craft into Lagrange points
I often wonder what the accuracy is when dealing with spacecraft and wondered how accurate a craft needs to be positioned into the Lagrange (L1,L2,L3) positions. Are we talking plus or minus 1km/100km/1000km etc. It's just that the system is so vast and what instruments are used to achieve a good L sweet spot?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is a certain aspect of "how long is a piece of string" about this. How long do you need to be "parked"?

You can get an idea by looking at the orbits of Trojan asteroids. Obviously they have been there for a long time.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and RobbyQ
  • #3
RobbyQ said:
TL;DR Summary: What is the accuracy of parking craft into Lagrange points

I often wonder what the accuracy is when dealing with spacecraft and wondered how accurate a craft needs to be positioned into the Lagrange (L1,L2,L3) positions. Are we talking plus or minus 1km/100km/1000km etc. It's just that the system is so vast and what instruments are used to achieve a good L sweet spot?
You can have a look at this, a practical example.

https://webb.nasa.gov/content/about/orbit.html
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71, Tom.G, DaveE and 2 others
  • #4
RobbyQ said:
TL;DR Summary: What is the accuracy of parking craft into Lagrange points

I often wonder what the accuracy is when dealing with spacecraft and wondered how accurate a craft needs to be positioned into the Lagrange (L1,L2,L3) positions. Are we talking plus or minus 1km/100km/1000km etc. It's just that the system is so vast and what instruments are used to achieve a good L sweet spot?
Those three Lagrange points are unstable, so there is a trade-off between staying close versus the fuel required to stay there. (L4 and L5 are stable). A big consideration is whether sunlight is needed for power. L2 is in the shadow of the Earth. JWST stays near, but orbiting the L2 Lagrange point so that its solar cells will get sunlight. The distance of JWST from the L2 point varies between 250,000 to 832,000 km. (see this). If you think that is a lot, remember that the Sun is over 100 million km away.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, DaveE, berkeman and 2 others
  • #5
FactChecker said:
Those three Lagrange points are unstable, so there is a trade-off between staying close versus the fuel required to stay there. (L4 and L5 are stable). A big consideration is whether sunlight is needed for power. L2 is in the shadow of the Earth. JWST stays near, but orbiting the L2 Lagrange point so that its solar cells will get sunlight. The distance of JWST from the L2 point varies between 250,000 to 832,000 km. (see this). If you think that is a lot, remember that the Sun is over 100 million km away.
Wow that's crazy. It actually orbits the L2
 
  • #6
RobbyQ said:
Wow that's crazy. It actually orbits the L2
Yes. It is roughly following the Earth's orbit but it is farther from the Sun than the Earth is. My understanding is that the combined gravity of the Sun and Earth (the component in the direction of the Sun) balance the centrifugal force of its orbit around the Sun so that part is in balance. Then it can essentially orbit the Earth at an offset distance around L2 (since there is a component of Earth gravity pointing toward L2). The orbit is a little unstable so it takes small corrections occasionally. There is a lot more to it that I am not knowledgeable enough to comment on.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and RobbyQ
  • #7
FactChecker said:
Yes. It is roughly following the Earth's orbit but it is farther from the Sun than the Earth is. My understanding is that the combined gravity of the Sun and Earth (the component in the direction of the Sun) balance the centrifugal force of its orbit around the Sun so that part is in balance. Then it can essentially orbit the Earth at an offset distance around L2 (since there is a component of Earth gravity pointing toward L2). The orbit is a little unstable so it takes small corrections occasionally. There is a lot more to it that I am not knowledgeable enough to comment on.
Thanks. This video I found very interesting too as it discusses the component forces leading up to the JWST orbit around L2. And even this is simplified.

 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, pinball1970, Tom.G and 1 other person
  • #8
RobbyQ said:
Thanks. This video I found very interesting too as it discusses the component forces leading up to the JWST orbit around L2. And even this is simplified.


That is a great video! Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes RobbyQ and pinball1970
  • #9
FactChecker said:
That is a great video! Thanks!
I agree . Very informative. Also what's interesting (about 5mins into video) is that they keep it slightly Earth side of L2 so it has tendency to fall Earth wards and so the thrust burners to correct it back towards L2 are always Sun facing so as not to have to turn it around and get burnt up.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and FactChecker
  • #10
RobbyQ said:
I agree . Very informative. Also what's interesting (about 5mins into video) is that they keep it slightly Earth side of L2 so it has tendency to fall Earth wards and so the thrust burners to correct it back towards L2 are always Sun facing so as not to have to turn it around and get burnt up.
Euclid joined L2 too last month.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid_(spacecraft)
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes FactChecker and RobbyQ

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
Back
Top