What happens to coronal mass ejections?

  • Thread starter newjerseyrunner
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mass
In summary, the conversation discusses the cause and effects of sunspots and solar flares, specifically in relation to the recent discovery of KIC 8462852. The participants wonder about the fate of the plasma ejected from solar flares and the potential for detecting these events from afar. They also touch on the relationship between solar flares and the Earth's magnetic field, and how they contribute to the beautiful aurora seen in the polar regions. It is noted that the majority of CMEs (coronal mass ejections) miss the Earth, and the aurora is mainly caused by charged particles already trapped in the Van Allen belts. The discussion also mentions the green line in the aurora, which is the meta-stable decay of an excited
  • #1
newjerseyrunner
1,533
637
This thread got me wondering something: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/kic-8462852-in-the-news.837900/page-5 Long story short: someone suggested starspots as a reason for it's weird variance. It had some problems with it, but it did get me wondering.

I know sunspots are caused by magnetic loops pushing plasma around and when these loops collapse, large amounts of plasma gets shot of into space in a solar flare. If that material hits Earth, it can cause problems with our electronics and satellites so we watch for them.

Other than that, I don't know much about them, what happens to all of that mass? I know that they are traveling at immense speed, and extremely hot. They're also charged and all of the particles would be charged the same way (or else they wouldn't have been stuck in the magnetic loop in the first place) so they should push themselves apart.

Then what happens? Is most of the material at escape velocity? Does it end up in the galactic wind eventually? Also, more relevant to the other thread, if the sun threw a tantrum, how far away would that be detectable from? I would think a huge mass of hot plasma being thrown from a star should produce a noticeable cloud glowing in the IR.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
newjerseyrunner said:
know sunspots are caused by magnetic loops pushing plasma around and when these loops collapse, large amounts of plasma gets shot of into space in a solar flare. If that material hits Earth, it can cause problems with our electronics and satellites so we watch for them.

Yes, that is correct, its gets trapped in the Earth's magnetic field, and it also causes the beautiful aurora around both the polar regions
newjerseyrunner said:
Other than that, I don't know much about them, what happens to all of that mass? I know that they are traveling at immense speed, and extremely hot. They're also charged and all of the particles would be charged the same way (or else they wouldn't have been stuck in the magnetic loop in the first place) so they should push themselves apart.
its speed varies greatly depending on the intensity anywhere between 800 - 3200 km/s. 3200 being an extreme. 1000 - 2000 km/s being the common range
As they propagate out, they will slow down and will become part of the normal solar wind
The solar wind speed and density as I type this is ...
Solar wind
speed: 386.2 km/sec
density: 2.2 protons/cm3
During a large CME, proton densities can get up to over 100 protons / cm3 which when compared to a cm3 of water is extremely low density

The CME's and solar wind in general, are primarily composed of protons and electrons
newjerseyrunner said:
Then what happens? Is most of the material at escape velocity? Does it end up in the galactic wind eventually? Also, more relevant to the other thread, if the sun threw a tantrum, how far away would that be detectable from? I would think a huge mass of hot plasma being thrown from a star should produce a noticeable cloud glowing in the IR.

some of it falls back onto the sun ( this can be seen in many of the videos of CME's), the rest gets blasted out into space.

Would be easily detected from the outer reaches of the solar system ... but from many lightyears away ... I can't answer thatDave
 
  • Like
Likes newjerseyrunner
  • #3
Few CME's happen to be emitted on an intercept course with Earth [think of the odds]. Those that are, are blunted by the magnetosphere which weakens their effects at ground level. As Dave noted effects of solar emissions are most pronounced at the magnetic poles where the magnetosphere is weakest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
If there was a solar storm, would it make a noticeable change in surrounding solar neighborhood that could be detected light years away?
 
  • #5
I would think that any CME missing the Earth will just keep on going, unless/until it hits something like another planetary magnetic field. What would happen when it hits the heliopause and the magnetosphere ? We do not know.
 
  • #6
AgentSmith said:
I would think that any CME missing the Earth will just keep on going, unless/until it hits something like another planetary magnetic field.

Any CME, regardless of if the Earth is in its path or not 99.99% of it goes right on past
CME's are huge and any that are directed in the Earths' direction, only a tiny fraction will be intercepted by the Earths' magnetic field

in this pic of a large CME, the Earth size in comparison would be about the size of that bright star centre right, just a few pixels

9729348_orig.gif
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes newjerseyrunner
  • #7
davenn said:
...Its gets trapped in the Earth's magnetic field, and it also causes the beautiful aurora around both the polar regions ... Dave
Yes that is slightly true, but very little, if any, of the solar flare is trapped. The aurora is mainly caused by charged particles that have long been trapped in the Van Allen belts.

The Earth's magnetic field lines converge more at lower altitudes and the trapped particles "mirror" back and forth from the North and South field convergence zones, normally turning around still high in the rare atmosphere, with little excitation of it / weak aurora. What the solar particle discharge that hits the Earth does, is make pressure on the Earth's field lines. Then the turn-a-round points for the already trapped particle can be closer to the Earth's surface - in denser but still rarefied atmosphere.

SUMMARY: The solar flare particle pulse does not DIRECTLY cause the northern lights.

It is interesting to note that the dominate green line, is from the meta-stable (first order forbidden) decay of an excited state of oxygen. It has a very low radiative transition probably, and when it decayed is very uncertain (compare to permitted decays). Thus by the uncertainty principle its "Delta T" is large and its "Delta E" is very small. I. e. its wave length and frequency (energy) are very precise. For an EM photon to have a precise frequency, it must have many cycles. So many that the green line photons from the aurora are more than a meter long!

Most people, even some Ph. D. physicists, think of photons as small ball-like packets of energy. I have measured the length of some from a low pressure lamp (so their transition is usually completed before any significant collision occurs). They were 30cm long.

How I measured the length of photons is explained here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-a-photon-is-created.818369/#post-5140207
 
Last edited:
  • #8
BillyT said:
Yes that is slightly true, but very little, if any, of the solar flare is trapped. The aurora is mainly caused by charged particles that have long been trapped in the Van Allen belts.

Sorry, but if that were true, then there would be bright aurora all the time

please provide solid research papers to support your claim
and I and dozens of others will admit error

Instead, we get strong aurora directly associated with the occurrence of flares and CME's
The Van Allen belts are too high up to be causing the aurora, which are happening at a much lower altitude ... around 50 - 150 km

Everything I have so far read over the years clearly states that the Van Allen belts are fed by the geomagnetic storms that cause the aurora, NOT the other way around where the particles in the belts cause the geomagnetic storms and then the auroraDave
 
Last edited:

Related to What happens to coronal mass ejections?

1. What is a coronal mass ejection (CME)?

A coronal mass ejection is a large release of plasma and magnetic field from the Sun's corona into space. This can happen when the magnetic field lines in the corona become twisted and unstable, causing them to suddenly release a huge amount of energy.

2. How often do coronal mass ejections occur?

Coronal mass ejections occur quite frequently, with an average of 2-3 per week during the peak of the solar cycle. However, they can also happen at any time during the solar cycle and are more common during periods of high solar activity.

3. What happens to Earth when a coronal mass ejection hits?

When a coronal mass ejection reaches Earth, it can cause a geomagnetic storm, which can disrupt radio communications, satellite operations, and power grids. It can also produce beautiful auroras in the polar regions.

4. Can coronal mass ejections be dangerous to humans?

Coronal mass ejections do not pose a direct threat to humans on Earth, as our atmosphere and magnetic field protect us from the harmful effects of the charged particles they release. However, they can indirectly affect our technology and infrastructure.

5. How do scientists predict coronal mass ejections?

Scientists use a variety of instruments, such as space-based observatories and ground-based telescopes, to monitor the Sun for signs of coronal mass ejections. They also use mathematical models and simulations to predict the path and impact of a CME on Earth.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
5K
Back
Top