What causes light to diffract in the double slit experiment?

  • I
  • Thread starter Ivanov
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Light
In summary, the double-slit experiment demonstrates that the interference pattern is caused by the superposition of two states of the photon, with the relative phase difference being dependent on the distance from each of the two slits. This creates a coherent superposition, which leads to the interference pattern.
  • #1
Ivanov
8
0
I was studying the double slit experiment and started wondering what exactly does happen to the wave when its in the slit that makes it diffract or not? I toyed around with http://www.falstad.com/ripple/ but could not figure what exactly goes on that makes things as they are.

While trying to answer myself two additional questions came up:
Does light require an EM field to travel through or does it create its own?
Is light nothing more than a ripple through the EM field and if so how do we quantise it? Wouldnt it have a continuous nature (I know it doesnt) because of that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ivanov said:
I was studying the double slit experiment and started wondering what exactly does happen to the wave when its in the slit that makes it diffract or not?
I assume you mean what causes the interference pattern? It is not the slit per se. It is the effect from both slits.
 
  • #3
DrChinese said:
I assume you mean what causes the interference pattern? It is not the slit per se. It is the effect from both slits.
Well that would be something I don't know as well, but my question is what happens in a single slit when a wave passes through it? Why is it that when the wavelength is shorter than the slit a tight cone is observed on the other side and if its a longer wl it spreads out and we observe diffraction?
 
  • #4
Ivanov said:
I was studying the double slit experiment and started wondering what exactly does happen to the wave when its in the slit that makes it diffract or not? I toyed around with http://www.falstad.com/ripple/ but could not figure what exactly goes on that makes things as they are.

While trying to answer myself two additional questions came up:
Does light require an EM field to travel through or does it create its own?
Is light nothing more than a ripple through the EM field and if so how do we quantise it? Wouldnt it have a continuous nature (I know it doesnt) because of that?

A light wave is an excitation of an EM field.

You can think of (free) quantum field theory as a theory of an infinite number of particles.
 
  • #5
Ivanov said:
I was studying the double slit experiment and started wondering what exactly does happen to the wave when its in the slit that makes it diffract or not?

During my investigations I stumbled upon this description of the double-slit experiment. According to this description, interference is a natural by-product of the fact that the state of the photon in the double slit experiment is a superposition of two states. The part I find interesting is the description says the interference is caused by the relative phase difference caused by the differing distance the photon is from each of the slits. Here is the description.

One example of a quantum interference phenomenon that arises from superposition [of pure states] is the double-slit experiment. The photon state is a superposition of two different states, one of which corresponds to the photon having passed through the left slit, and the other corresponding to passage through the right slit. The relative phase of those two states has a value which depends on the distance from each of the two slits. Depending on what that phase is, the interference is constructive at some locations and destructive in others, creating the interference pattern. By the analogy with coherence in other wave phenomena, a superposed state can be referred to as a coherent superposition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_state#Superposition_of_pure_states
 
Last edited:

Related to What causes light to diffract in the double slit experiment?

1. What does "Light has left me in the dark" mean?

"Light has left me in the dark" is a metaphor that describes a feeling of being lost, confused, or without guidance. It can be interpreted as feeling abandoned or without direction.

2. Is "Light has left me in the dark" a scientific statement?

No, "Light has left me in the dark" is not a scientific statement. It is a figure of speech that conveys an emotional or metaphorical message.

3. How does light actually leave someone in the dark?

Light does not physically leave someone in the dark. This phrase is used to express a feeling of being without light, both literally and metaphorically. In a literal sense, when a light source is turned off or removed, it can leave a person in the dark. Metaphorically, it can represent a lack of understanding or clarity.

4. Can "Light has left me in the dark" have a positive meaning?

Yes, "Light has left me in the dark" can have a positive meaning. It can be used to describe a sense of self-discovery or enlightenment after a period of confusion or uncertainty. It can also represent a newfound understanding or perspective.

5. Are there any scientific studies on the effects of light on mood?

Yes, there have been numerous scientific studies on the effects of light on mood. Research has shown that exposure to natural light can improve mood, increase productivity, and alleviate symptoms of depression and seasonal affective disorder (SAD). Additionally, the color and intensity of artificial light can also have an impact on mood and well-being.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
915
Replies
3
Views
823
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
60
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
680
Replies
3
Views
801
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top