What are the earliest online publications discussing the Twin Paradox?

In summary, there is a request for resources on the Twin Paradox, specifically works that can be accessed online and were published before being put online. The best article suggested is "The Clock Paradox in Relativity Theory" by Alfred Schild, published in 1959. It is available through JSTOR and some of the arguments can also be found in another online paper. The original post emphasizes that the discussion should not turn into a debate on the Twin Paradox.
  • #1
Prague
48
0
I was wondering if anyone knew of any works that can be accessed online that were published before they were put online that deal with the Twin paradox? Thanks.





- to a mentor, sorry I forgot that this belongs in the SR thread.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
As I posted before, ...
In my opinion, one of the best articles on the Twin Paradox is:

"The Clock Paradox in Relativity Theory"
Alfred Schild
American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 66, No. 1 (Jan., 1959) , pp. 1-18

If your institution has access to JSTOR, it is available here
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9890%28195901%2966%3A1%3C1%3ATCPIRT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-L

Some of the arguments that appear in
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html
can be found in the above paper.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
The original post was asking for resources. This will not devolve into just another Twin Paradox debate.
 
Last edited:

Related to What are the earliest online publications discussing the Twin Paradox?

1. What is the Twin Paradox?

The Twin Paradox is a thought experiment in Einstein's theory of special relativity that explores the concept of time dilation. It involves two twins, one who stays on Earth and one who travels in a high-speed rocket to a distant planet and back. When the traveling twin returns, they have aged less than the twin who stayed on Earth, even though they experienced the same amount of time.

2. How does the Twin Paradox challenge our understanding of time?

The Twin Paradox challenges our understanding of time because it demonstrates that time is not constant and can be affected by the speed at which an object is moving. It also shows that time is relative and can be perceived differently by observers in different reference frames.

3. Is the Twin Paradox a real phenomenon or just a thought experiment?

The Twin Paradox is a thought experiment, but it is based on the principles of Einstein's theory of special relativity, which have been confirmed through numerous experiments and observations. While we cannot currently travel at speeds close to the speed of light to test the Twin Paradox directly, its predictions have been supported by other experiments and observations.

4. Can the Twin Paradox be resolved or explained?

Yes, the Twin Paradox can be resolved and explained using the principles of special relativity. The key to understanding the paradox is realizing that the traveling twin experiences two different reference frames – one while traveling at a high speed and one when they return to Earth. This causes their perception of time to be different from the twin who stayed on Earth.

5. Are there any real-life examples of the Twin Paradox?

While we cannot currently travel at speeds close to the speed of light, there are real-life examples that demonstrate the effects of time dilation. For example, astronauts who have spent extended periods of time in space have aged slightly less than their counterparts on Earth due to their high speeds in orbit. Additionally, atomic clocks on airplanes have been found to run slightly slower than those on the ground, further supporting the principles of the Twin Paradox.

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
106
Views
8K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
5K
Back
Top