VVER Fuel Assemblies: Advanced Hexagonal Arrangement

In summary: However, there are reports of premature fuel cladding failure in some Ukrainian units running on Westinghouse fuel.
  • #1
2,075
399
I was surprised to learn recently that VVER fuel assemblies are in some respects more advanced than typical Western PWR fuel: namely, fuel rods are arranged in a hexagonal pattern in the fuel bundle:

https://www.google.cz/search?q=vver fuel&tbm=isch

This is the most dense and uniform packing. In the West, I only heard about _plans_ to use such bundles (I read about it in Japanese docs about they Reduced moderation water reactor projects).
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Fuel pellet changes during reactor operation:

http://www.kfki.hu/~aekihp/phenomena.htm
 
  • #3
Russian nuclear engineering is very advanced. They are still relatively well funded for R&D of new nuclear technologies. They also seem far more willing to take economic risks than most other countries (or corporations) and still view nuclear technology as a point of pride for a country. Plus they can leverage some of the investment in cold-war era nuclear tech/equipment. They are the only country in the world still trying to build fast reactors (everyone else gave up for now).
 
  • #4
LOL I'm twenty years retired and my little reactors had skewed hex units, twisted like a bundle of pencils.
 
  • #5
Doug Huffman said:
LOL I'm twenty years retired and my little reactors had skewed hex units, twisted like a bundle of pencils.

Research reactors? I have no doubts all kinds of different things (fuels, geometries, coolants...) were tried in those.
Bringing new stuff to big power reactors is vastly more difficult.
 
  • #6
Hologram0110 said:
Russian nuclear engineering is very advanced. They are still relatively well funded for R&D of new nuclear technologies. They also seem far more willing to take economic risks than most other countries (or corporations) and still view nuclear technology as a point of pride for a country. Plus they can leverage some of the investment in cold-war era nuclear tech/equipment. They are the only country in the world still trying to build fast reactors (everyone else gave up for now).

The (ex-)Soviet safety record is the worst of all nuclear powers, though. I am far from sure that even today their, say, reprocessing facilities, are safe enough. They have a horrible track record in disposing of nuclear waste, one which would make Hanford look like a green meadow.
 
  • #7
nikkkom said:
Research reactors? [ ... ]
~100 MWth
 
  • #8
Doug Huffman said:
~100 MWth

Hmm. Elaborate :)
 
  • #9
nikkkom said:
I was surprised to learn recently that VVER fuel assemblies are in some respects more advanced than typical Western PWR fuel: namely, fuel rods are arranged in a hexagonal pattern in the fuel bundle:

https://www.google.cz/search?q=vver fuel&tbm=isch

This is the most dense and uniform packing. In the West, I only heard about _plans_ to use such bundles (I read about it in Japanese docs about they Reduced moderation water reactor projects).
The US and European commercial nuclear industry settled on square lattice designs long ago. However, Westinghouse has since developed a hexagonal (triangular) lattice design, VVantage6. I think the western suppliers determined that square lattices were simpler to model and manufacture.

The Shippingport reactor had hexagonal (and skewed-hexagonal) fuel lattices.

Some history - http://www.portal.state.pa.us/porta...4569/_atoms_for_peace__in_pennsylvania/471309

Some technical documents
http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/2664750.pdf
http://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/5914091

Fast reactor fuel had hexagonal geometry, and was ducted.

nikkkom said:
Fuel pellet changes during reactor operation:
http://www.kfki.hu/~aekihp/phenomena.htm
This is typical LWR UO2/MOX fuel behavior/performance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Zaporizhzhya NPP Unit 5 is going to be loaded with Westinghouse fuel:

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/UF-Westinghouse-fuel-assemblies-arrive-at-Zaporozhe-plant-24021601.html[/PLAIN]

It's the third unit in Ukraine to start shifting to Westinghouse fuel. (They don't replace all fuel at once, so reactors will operate on a "mixed" load for a few years. This does create some difficulties, since different fuel bundles have somewhat different hydraulics).

According to Russian/Ukrainian technical forums I monitor, Westinghouse fuel performs no worse than Russian one, maybe even a tad better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related to VVER Fuel Assemblies: Advanced Hexagonal Arrangement

1. What is a VVER fuel assembly?

A VVER (Vodo-Vodyanoi Energetichesky Reactor) fuel assembly is a set of fuel rods used in a type of pressurized water reactor (PWR) nuclear power plant. It is the main component of the reactor core and is responsible for generating heat through nuclear fission reactions.

2. What is the purpose of an advanced hexagonal arrangement in VVER fuel assemblies?

The advanced hexagonal arrangement in VVER fuel assemblies is designed to improve the efficiency and safety of the reactor. This arrangement allows for better fuel utilization and distribution of neutron flux, leading to a longer fuel cycle and higher power output.

3. How does the advanced hexagonal arrangement differ from traditional square arrangements in VVER fuel assemblies?

The traditional square arrangement in VVER fuel assemblies has a central channel for the control rod, which limits the number of fuel rods that can be placed in the core. The advanced hexagonal arrangement eliminates this central channel and allows for a higher number of fuel rods, resulting in increased power output and longer fuel cycles.

4. What are the benefits of using an advanced hexagonal arrangement in VVER fuel assemblies?

The advanced hexagonal arrangement offers several benefits, including higher power output, longer fuel cycles, and improved safety. It also allows for easier maintenance and refueling of the reactor, as well as better distribution of neutron flux, leading to more stable and efficient operation.

5. Are there any drawbacks to using an advanced hexagonal arrangement in VVER fuel assemblies?

One potential drawback of the advanced hexagonal arrangement is that it may require modifications to the existing reactor design, which can be costly and time-consuming. Additionally, the increased number of fuel rods may lead to higher fuel costs. However, the benefits of this arrangement typically outweigh any potential drawbacks.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
1
Views
923
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top