Vout of non-inverting adder circuit

In summary: I need to derive this expression v_{out}=\frac{1}{2}(v_{1}-v_{2})(\frac{R_{3}+R_{2}}{R_{3}})If your output is saturated it is no longer true that the + and - inputs are the same. So not only is the - input not v1 + v2, it isn't even the same as the + input.The reason the output is saturated is that there is insufficient fedback voltage. The feedback voltage is Vout*R3/(R2+R3). I would say make R3/(R2+R3) at least 0.5
  • #1
leroyjenkens
616
49

Homework Statement



I need to derive this expression [itex]v_{out}=\frac{1}{2}(v_{1}-v_{2})(\frac{R_{3}+R_{2}}{R_{3}})[/itex]

Using the circuit I'm given. I uploaded it.



The Attempt at a Solution



So far I have [itex]v_{in}=v_{+}+v_{-}[/itex] which is from "rule #2 of op amps", which is "The feedback in the op-amp circuit drives the voltage differences between the inverting and non-inverting inputs to zero."

And since the circuit looks like a voltage divider, I can use the voltage divider equation to get [itex]v_{out}=v_{in}(\frac{R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}})[/itex], which gives me [itex]v_{out}=(v_{1}+v_{2})(\frac{R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}})[/itex], but I can't figure out why there's a [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] in front of the equation that I'm given at the beginning, or why the term with the resistors is the inverse of mine.

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 455
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I can't even imagine how you came up with your "voltage divider".

Start from the + input pin of the op amp. What is that voltage in terms of v1 and v2?
 
  • #3
rude man said:
I can't even imagine how you came up with your "voltage divider".

Start from the + input pin of the op amp. What is that voltage in terms of v1 and v2?

I think I used the wrong resistors. I meant to use R2 and R3. That would be a voltage divider, right?

The voltage at the + input pin has to be zero, so [itex]v_1=-v_2[/itex]
 
  • #4
leroyjenkens said:
I think I used the wrong resistors. I meant to use R2 and R3. That would be a voltage divider, right?

The voltage at the + input pin has to be zero, so [itex]v_1=-v_2[/itex]

But, but ... v1 and v2 are your inputs! They can be anything you want so long as the amplifier's limits are not exceeded. In this case, the + and - op amp inputs must be between -8 and +8V, approximately, depending on the particular op amp type and the power supplies.

In other words - no, the + input does not have to be zero. It just has to be the same as the - input.
 
  • #5
We built this in a lab and I found that v1 and v2 were both 3.55, and the saturation was 14.06. And to make this equation true: [itex]v_{out}=2(v_{1}+v_{2})[/itex] I needed R3 to be 1 ohm and R2 to be 3 ohms.

So vout has to be equal to vin and I calculate what that is across the voltage divider at the bottom? So [itex]v_{out}=2(v_{1}+v_{2})[/itex] and [itex]v_{in}=(v_{1}+v_{2})[/itex]
And vin across the voltage divider is [itex](v_{1}+v_{2})(\frac{R_{3}}{R_{3}+R_{2}})[/itex]

And I have no idea how to turn that into this: [itex]v_{out}=\frac{1}{2}(v_{1}+v_{2})(\frac{R_{3}+R_{2}}{R_{3}})[/itex]
 
  • #6
You say you "found" that v1 and v2 were both 3.55V? How did those voltages get there?

Are we talking about the right circuit in the first place?

If we are, you need to answer the above question and the one I asked before, to wit, what is the voltage at the + input of the amplifier?

Don't proceed until you have answered those two questions.
 
  • #7
rude man said:
You say you "found" that v1 and v2 were both 3.55V? How did those voltages get there?

Are we talking about the right circuit in the first place?

If we are, you need to answer the above question and the one I asked before, to wit, what is the voltage at the + input of the amplifier?

Don't proceed until you have answered those two questions.

That was the voltage I supplied to both v1 and v2 to which point it saturated at 14.06.

Yeah, I built this circuit on a protoboard.

The voltage at the + input would be v1 + v2, would it not? , and the voltage at the - input would also be v1 + v2, right?
 
  • #8
leroyjenkens said:
That was the voltage I supplied to both v1 and v2 to which point it saturated at 14.06.

Yeah, I built this circuit on a protoboard.

The voltage at the + input would be v1 + v2, would it not?
No. If v1 = v2 there is no current in either R1 so how can the midpoint, which is the + input to the op amp, be 7.1V?

, and the voltage at the - input would also be v1 + v2, right?
[/quote]

If your output is saturated it is no longer true that the + and - inputs are the same. So not only is the - input not v1 + v2, it isn't even the same as the + input.

The reason the output is saturated is that there is insufficient fedback voltage.
The feedback voltage is Vout*R3/(R2+R3). I would say make R3/(R2+R3) at least 0.5. You neeed to make this ratio high enough to bring the output out of saturation. Either that or reduce your input voltages.

What are R1, R2 and R3 anyway?
 

Related to Vout of non-inverting adder circuit

What is Vout in a non-inverting adder circuit?

Vout stands for the output voltage of a non-inverting adder circuit. It is the voltage that appears at the output terminal of the circuit and is a result of the inputs being added together.

How is Vout calculated in a non-inverting adder circuit?

Vout is calculated by taking the sum of the input voltages multiplied by their respective gain values. In a non-inverting adder circuit, the gain value is typically 1, so Vout is equal to the sum of the input voltages.

Can Vout be higher or lower than the input voltages in a non-inverting adder circuit?

Yes, Vout can be higher or lower than the input voltages depending on the values of the inputs and their gains. If the gain values are greater than 1, Vout will be higher than the input voltages. If the gain values are less than 1, Vout will be lower than the input voltages.

What factors can affect Vout in a non-inverting adder circuit?

The values of the input voltages and their respective gain values are the main factors that can affect Vout in a non-inverting adder circuit. Other factors such as the quality of the components and external interference can also have an impact on Vout.

What are some common applications of a non-inverting adder circuit?

Non-inverting adder circuits are commonly used in signal processing, audio mixers, and instrumentation amplifiers. They can also be used in mathematical operations such as addition and subtraction, and in analog-to-digital converters.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
867
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
327
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
380
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
258
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
690
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
920
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
200
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
702
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
469
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
168
Back
Top