Researchers working with large magnetic fields discovered in the 1960's that metals when induced into a high spin state (using fields of approximately 540,000 gauss) were capable of passing energy from one high spin atom to the next with no net loss of energy.
kurros said:If that is all the info you have then why do you care to find it? There must surely be some relevant background information you have not mentioned.
If that is all the info you have then why do you care to find it? There must surely be some relevant background information you have not mentioned.
Call me paranoid, but based in the recent questions in this forum, I think that there is some scam going on, offering some incredible business opportunity based on pseudoscience. What i do not get is why is everyone asking in this forum, except if some keyword search is pointing here.
Researchers working with large magnetic fields discovered in the 1960's that metals when induced into a high spin state (using energies of approximately 540,000 gauss) were capable of passing energy from one high spin atom to the next with no net loss of energy! This was the discovery of superconductivity.
Related: Overhauser effect: "The Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE) is the transfer of nuclear spin polarization from one nuclear spin population to another via cross-relaxation."The existence of the SDW [spin-density wave] in Cr was first posited in 1960 by Albert Overhauser of Purdue. Cliff Shull of MIT won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1994 for his experimental observation of the Cr SDW. The theory of CDWs [charge-density wave] was first put forth by Rudolf Peierls of Oxford University, who was trying to explain superconductivity.
This looks like superconducting tunnel junction, but is different from superconducting materials in general.website said:Superconductivity allows the conduction of energy through a resonance phenomenon. Unlike electrical conduction, energy can be passed from one superconductor to another with contact, without resistance and, therefore, with no net loss of energy.
This is wrong.website said:To create superconductivity in a potential superconductor, an external magnetic field must be applied to get the system going. Once the flow of energy is set in motion, however, it is only necessary to keep the conditions correct so that the material remains superconductive.
And this part of the initial quote is wrong, too. Superconductivity was discovered in 1911 with mercury, and without any magnetic fields.This was the discovery of superconductivity.
This is a 1960's book that my Ph.D. studied at Iowa State University and it's actually an article about nuclear quadrupole moment and nuclear quadrupole moment spectroscopy. They actually find that by applying these 800,000 gauss magnetic fields that they could cause the nucleus to spin flip to the high-spin state. And then when they release these fields they read the resonance that comes out of the nucleus as the nucleus drops back down to the low spin state.
In the 1960s, the first CoII SCO complex was reported by Busch and coworkers,[6] followed by Konig and Madeja in 1967 when they performed extensive magnetic and Mössbauer spectroscopic studies on these complexes and developed the nature of the spin transition in some of the first iron(II) SCO complexes
The existence of a scientific article is usually verified through peer review. This process involves independent experts in the same field as the article's topic critically evaluating the research and findings before it is published. This helps to ensure the validity and accuracy of the article.
Journals play a crucial role in the verification process of scientific articles. They act as the gatekeepers for publication and are responsible for selecting and reviewing articles for their quality and significance. Journals also have strict guidelines and standards that articles must meet before being published, further ensuring their validity.
In most cases, the general public does not have access to the full process of verifying the existence of a scientific article. However, once an article is published, it is available for the public to read and evaluate. Additionally, some journals offer open access options, allowing anyone to read and review the articles they publish.
No, the existence of a scientific article is not always guaranteed. While peer review and journal standards help to ensure the accuracy and validity of articles, mistakes and errors can still occur. It is important for readers to critically evaluate the information presented in any scientific article and consider the credibility of the source.
Yes, the existence of a scientific article can be challenged or disproved through further research and evidence. The scientific community encourages open discussion and scrutiny of research to continually improve and advance our understanding of the world. If new evidence is presented that contradicts a previously published article, it can be re-evaluated and potentially disproved.