No, maybe "abstract" wasn't the right word. What I meant was that sometimes we go to war to protect the supply of oil. But we've never seized the oil for our own profit, despite conspiracy theories that we would.Alfi said:Would 'Wars for profit' be abstract?
If the US's wars were profitable then why aren't we discussing expanding our military operations as a method of reducing our deficit?Alfi said:Would 'Wars for profit' be abstract?
The US has a complex relationship with oil in these countries. Prior to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US had economic and political interests in securing access to their oil reserves. In Libya, the US supported the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi, who had control over the country's oil industry. Additionally, the US has been accused of using the wars as a means to gain control over these countries' oil resources.
The US involvement in these countries has had a significant impact on their oil industries. In Afghanistan and Iraq, the wars have caused major disruptions to oil production and infrastructure, leading to decreased exports and revenue. In Libya, the overthrow of Gaddafi and ongoing conflicts have also resulted in a decline in oil production. Additionally, the presence of foreign oil companies and privatization of the industry in these countries have raised concerns about exploitation and inequality.
There is no definitive evidence that the US went to war solely for oil. However, there are several factors that suggest oil played a significant role in the decision to go to war. These include the US's history of involvement in the region's oil industry, the economic benefits of controlling oil reserves, and the presence of oil company executives in high-level positions in the US government at the time of the wars.
The US has used various justifications for their actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, including promoting democracy, fighting terrorism, and protecting national security. However, many critics argue that these justifications are a cover for the US's true motives of gaining control over oil resources. Additionally, the US has also argued that their involvement in these countries will ultimately benefit their oil industries and the global economy.
The long-term effects of the US wars on the oil industries in these countries are still uncertain. The ongoing conflicts and instability in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya have hindered their ability to fully recover and develop their oil resources. Additionally, the privatization and foreign control of their oil industries may continue to create economic and political issues for these countries. It is also possible that the US's involvement in these countries may have lasting impacts on global oil markets and the relationship between oil and war in the future.