Understanding the Minimum Energy Principle in Thermodynamics

In summary: F is not always minimized. In the case of a system that is free to radiate away energy to the environment, energy will be at a minimum. So you minimize U.But why will U (in the case where F=U-TS is minimized) not also be minimized not also be minized? Is it because our system can get energy for free from the environment? (I guess that's the idea behind introducing F) But either way, will the system not still also have minimum in U when F is minimized?It depends on the particular system. In some cases, F will be minimized. In other cases, U will be minimized.
  • #1
aaaa202
1,169
2
Confuses me. In which case is it the helmholtz free energy, the gibbs free energy, the energy that gets minimized and why? Also is it consistent with energy conservation and how is that possible if you use it on two systems exchanging energy. Can we know the total energy of the total system for the principle to apply or only the average?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The laws of thermodynamics insist energy is exchanged. 'Negative' energy cannot be exchanged. That would be like a credit card that refunds you more than you charge. It doesn't happen, otherwise the universe would already be broke.
 
  • #3
The reason for the different kinds of energy is because there are different kinds of constraints affecting a system.

Suppose you have a small system that is free to exchange energy with a much larger system (say, a reservoir of gas or liquid). In that case, it doesn't make sense to say that the small system should minimize its energy, because any energy that leaves the small system must go to the large system. What it does make sense to do is to maximize the total entropy, [itex]S[/itex], which is the sum of the entropy [itex]S_1[/itex] of the small system and the entropy [itex]S_2[/itex] of the big system.

Maximizing the total entropy turns out to be the same thing as minimizing the quantity

[itex]\mathcal{E} - S_1(\mathcal{E}) T[/itex]

where [itex]\mathcal{E}[/itex] is the energy of the small system, subject to the constraint that [itex]T =[/itex] constant.

If the volume of the small system is allowed to change, as well, (imagine a balloon in a much larger room--the balloon can increase its volume, but only by decreasing the volume available in the room outside of the balloon), then maximizing the total entropy in this case is the same thing as minimizing the quantity

[itex]\mathcal{E} - S_1(\mathcal{E}) T + P V_1[/itex]

where [itex]V_1[/itex] is the volume of the small system, subject to the constraints that [itex]T = [/itex] constant and [itex]P = [/itex] constant.

The appropriate values for [itex]P[/itex] and [itex]T[/itex] are determined by the entropy of the large system:

[itex]\frac{1}{T} = \frac{\partial S_2}{\partial E_2}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{P}{T} = \frac{\partial S_2}{\partial V_2}[/itex]

where [itex]E_2[/itex] is the energy of the large system and [itex]V_2[/itex] is its volume.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Okay can you explain in more detail why it is that for a system at constant pressure and temperature that it is the Gibbs free energy that gets minimized and not the Helmholtz energy for instance? (maybe they both get minimized but G deals with the relevant variables)

G=U-TS+pV

dG= dU-TdS+SdT+pdV+Vdp = Vdp = 0

If one uses dU = TdS - pdV and dT=dP=0

This doesn't seem right - shouldn't it decrease? - when should I use dU = dQ+dW and when should I use TdS - pdV - for some reason I don't like to equate those two expressions even though my book does.

Also since F=U-TS and G=U-TS+pV will F not be minimized whenever G is minimized.
 
  • #5
aaaa202 said:
Okay can you explain in more detail why it is that for a system at constant pressure and temperature that it is the Gibbs free energy that gets minimized and not the Helmholtz energy for instance? (maybe they both get minimized but G deals with the relevant variables)

G=U-TS+pV

dG= dU-TdS+SdT+pdV+Vdp = Vdp = 0

That's not correct. Since
[itex]dU = T dS - P dV[/itex]
[itex]dG = T dS - P dV - (T dS + S dT) + (P dV + V dP) = V dP - S dT[/itex]

So [itex]dG = 0[/itex] when [itex]P[/itex] and [itex]T[/itex] are held constant.

If one uses dU = TdS - pdV and dT=dP=0

This doesn't seem right - shouldn't it decrease? - when should I use dU = dQ+dW and when should I use TdS - pdV - for some reason I don't like to equate those two expressions even though my book does.

Also since F=U-TS and G=U-TS+pV will F not be minimized whenever G is minimized.

[itex]dS[/itex] is defined to be [itex]\frac{dQ}{T}[/itex] and [itex]dW[/itex] is defined to be [itex]-P dV[/itex], so it doesn't matter which form you use, as long as you are talking about infinitesimal, reversible changes.

If you have a system that is free to radiate away energy to the environment, then at equilibrium, then energy will be at a minimum. So you minimize [itex]U[/itex].

If the temperature is being held constant, then instead you minimize:

[itex]F = U - ST[/itex]

(Helmholtz free energy)

[itex]dF = -P dV - S dT[/itex]

So [itex]dF = 0[/itex] if [itex]V[/itex] and [itex]T[/itex] are held constant.
 
  • #6
But why will U (in the case where F=U-TS is minimized) not also be minimized not also be minized? Is it because our system can get energy for free from the environment? (I guess that's the idea behind introducing F) But either way, will the system not still also have minimum in U when F is minimal?
 
  • #7
aaaa202 said:
But why will U (in the case where F=U-TS is minimized) not also be minimized not also be minized? Is it because our system can get energy for free from the environment? (I guess that's the idea behind introducing F) But either way, will the system not still also have minimum in U when F is minimal?

If the small system is free to exchange energy with a reservoir, then as I said, any energy that leaves the small system must be transferred to the reservoir. So minimizing the energy of the small system is maximizing the energy of the reservoir. So what actually happens is determined by the temperatures. If the small system has a higher temperature than the reservoir, then energy will flow from the small system to the reservoir. If the small system has a lower temperature, then energy will flow from the reservoir to the small system. Eventually, they will achieve the same temperature. At that point, neither system will be at a minimum energy, but will be at the minimum value of [itex]U - S T[/itex], subject to the constraint that the temperature is the equilibrium temperature.
 
  • #8
Let me just try to understand again:

Maximum entropy principle: We know the average energy of a system interacting with a resevoir and find the energy distribution by maximizing S(U).

Minimum energy principle: We know the average entropy of a system interacting with a resevoir and find the energy distribution by minimizing U(S)? Or do we know the exact entropy? I don't see how the latter case can be possible since we can't know the entropy of a system completely if it can exchange energy (and thus entropy) with a resevoir.

Minimum free energy principle: We know ... ?
 

Related to Understanding the Minimum Energy Principle in Thermodynamics

What is the principle of minimum energy?

The principle of minimum energy, also known as the principle of least action, states that in a physical system, the motion or behavior will always follow the path of least resistance or require the minimum amount of energy to achieve a specific outcome.

How does the principle of minimum energy relate to conservation of energy?

The principle of minimum energy is closely related to the law of conservation of energy. This principle states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or transformed. In a system following the principle of minimum energy, the total energy remains constant, as the system will always seek the path of least resistance to conserve energy.

What are some examples of the principle of minimum energy in action?

The principle of minimum energy can be observed in various physical systems, such as the path of a ball rolling down a hill, the behavior of a pendulum, or the flow of electricity in a circuit. It can also be seen in biological systems, such as the movements of animals and the growth and development of plants.

How is the principle of minimum energy used in engineering and design?

The principle of minimum energy is an important concept in engineering and design, as it allows engineers to find the most efficient and effective solutions for a given problem. This principle is often applied in the design of bridges, buildings, and other structures, as well as in the development of new technologies and products.

Are there any exceptions to the principle of minimum energy?

While the principle of minimum energy is a fundamental concept in physics, there are some cases where it may not apply. For example, in quantum mechanics, systems can exhibit behavior that does not follow the path of least resistance. Additionally, in chaotic systems, the behavior may be unpredictable and not necessarily follow the path of minimum energy.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
802
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
630
Replies
9
Views
247
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
48
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
765
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top