Different reference frames have no bearing on what any observer sees, measures or observes. They only affect the coordinates that are applied to different events. The observers have to wait for the light to propagate from those events to wherever they are and by that time all frames preserve the timing of what the observers see. You're never going to understand this until you decide to learn about the Lorentz Transformation process which is very simple.durant said:What is the criteria to see the latest state of some object which exists after all the previous states in other reference frames? For instance, one observer may see a plane coming off the airport as 'present', other may see 'its flying' as present, but what is the criteria of those reference frames so we can see the 'latest' event?
durant said:what is the criteria of those reference frames so we can see the 'latest' event?
Isn't what you are saying here is that at the moment that two observers are colocated, all frames will agree that whatever one sees, the other sees at the same time?Naty1 said:As an additional insight, the above replies reflect the fact that all reference frames see the speed of light as 'c'. In other words, if you are stationary with respect to an object and I am 'rocketing' right past you, that is, at high speed, I'll see the event at the same time as you if we are the same distance from the object.
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here but it doesn't seem to be merely another way to think about your first comment because these observers are not colocated. Can you elaborate?Naty1 said:Another way to think about it is in a police radar observation: The cop may be sitting idle, you may be approaching her position at 80 mph...but you see each other at the same moment...nobody gets a 'preview' peek. As noted in the above comments, the closer you become, the more 'current' your observations of each other.
Reference frames are systems of coordinates that are used to describe the position and motion of objects. They serve as a point of reference for observers to measure the location, speed, and acceleration of an object.
Understanding reference frames is crucial for accurately recording and interpreting real-time events. Different reference frames can result in different measurements and observations of the same event, so it is essential to have a consistent frame of reference to ensure accurate data.
Reference frames can greatly influence our perception of events. For example, an observer's reference frame can affect their perception of the speed and direction of an object's motion. Additionally, the choice of reference frame can also influence how we interpret the cause and effect of events.
Yes, reference frames can be changed. In fact, it is often necessary to switch between different reference frames to accurately observe and understand an event. However, it is important to ensure that all measurements and observations are made within the same reference frame to avoid inconsistencies and errors.
The most appropriate reference frame for an event depends on various factors, such as the type of event, the location of the observer, and the desired measurements. In general, the reference frame that simplifies the observation and analysis of the event is considered the most appropriate. It is also important to consider the context and potential biases when choosing a reference frame.