- #1
mechaxl
- 1
- 0
I just had a question about quantum mechanics that has been muddied somewhat by pop culture's understanding of the quantum world. My question is this: Would it be correct to say that the reason that there is inherent uncertainty in measuring the quantum world is because of the methods of measurement (i.e. using photons to hit another photon, which wouldn't produce an accurate result) rather than simply because of the fact that something is being observed (which just seems to be an explanation that people come up with because they don't understand what they're talking about)? In other words, if, theoretically, we had a particle much smaller than any other known particle that we could use to measure those particles, could we then obtain all the information that we needed from them?