If that were the case,there would not have been any ionic compounds formed!Scheuerf said:I would think that the electrons would prefer to keep both objects neutral.
Usually an object (especially one made of insulating material) acquires a charge by contact with other materials (as when a comb is rubbed with a pice of cloth). It's therefore usually (a very small fraction of) molecules on the surface which gain or lose electrons (usually only one electron on anyone affected molecule). Conductors can also be charged. Again it is surface atoms or molecules which have the extra electron or are missing the electron. This time, though, the reason is rather different. Even if charge were to be deposited inside the object, it would migrate to the surface, essentially because of mutual repulsion.Scheuerf said:When an object has excess electrons and is charged where are they?
A conductor loves to do just that, the electrons are merely the means. It seems to me you think of a charged mass like a battery, with cells full of electrons bouncing around ready to go to work. In concept it is the same, but in static situations where Faraday pioneered, a use for the energy needs to exist, i.e. ground short, to induce a flow. The inspiring fact of the day to remember is that the energy has more tendency to stay where it is at as an electron at rest, than it does to move with relativistic but otherwise known as invariant mass, that would vacate its premises.Scheuerf said:I would think that the electrons would prefer to keep both objects neutral.
jerromyjon said:A conductor loves to do just that, the electrons are merely the means. It seems to me you think of a charged mass like a battery, with cells full of electrons bouncing around ready to go to work. In concept it is the same, but in static situations where Faraday pioneered, a use for the energy needs to exist, i.e. ground short, to induce a flow. The inspiring fact of the day to remember is that the energy has more tendency to stay where it is at as an electron at rest, than it does to move with relativistic but otherwise known as invariant mass, that would vacate its premises.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triboelectric_effectScheuerf said:Also when two neutrally charged objects are rubbed together why do they both become charged? I would think that the electrons would prefer to keep both objects neutral.
Excess electrons are electrons that are not in their usual, balanced state within an atom or molecule. This can occur when an object gains or loses electrons through various processes such as friction, contact, or exposure to certain materials or energy sources.
Excess electrons can cause charged objects to repel or attract each other depending on their respective charges. For example, if an object has an excess of electrons, it will have a negative charge and will repel other negatively charged objects. This is due to the principle of electrostatic force, which states that like charges repel and opposite charges attract.
An object can acquire excess electrons through various processes, such as friction, contact, or exposure to certain materials or energy sources. For example, when two objects rub against each other, electrons can transfer from one object to the other, resulting in one object having an excess of electrons.
Excess electrons can impact the behavior of materials in various ways. For example, they can cause materials to become charged, which can lead to repulsion or attraction between objects. Excess electrons can also cause materials to become conductors or insulators, depending on their properties and the amount of excess electrons present.
Yes, excess electrons can be removed from an object through various methods, such as grounding, contact with a material with a different charge, or exposure to certain energy sources. This process is known as discharge and can restore an object to its balanced state.