Tuning for force tracking in MR (Magneto-Rheological) dampers

In summary, the conversation discusses the creation of a MR damper model using NPLDD double input data, which accurately follows the hysteresis curve behavior shown in experimental data. This model is then used to develop a closed loop model for force tracking control, utilizing continuous state control and If-Then Rules block. However, after tuning the values of G and B and testing with various input waveforms, the force tracking result does not match the input. The spikes in the graph may be due to the tuning of G and B values and there is a discussion about potentially using a PID controller instead. The goal is to achieve a close match between the input and output graphs.
  • #1
Shuhaibul
I already create MR damper modelling by using non-parametric linearised data driven (NPLDD) double input model. The hysteresis curve behavior is 99.9% followed as per experimental data, Figure below:

Figure%201_Hysteresis%20Curve.jpg

Then, by using this model, I had created closed loop model for force tracking control. The closed loop is developed by using continuous state control and If-Then Rules block as below:

Figure%202_Closed%20Loop%20Diagram.jpg

The input Fd_des and velocity is set to be sine, square, and sawtooth waveform, so that the output (Fd_act) will exhibit the same as input (Fd_des). However, after several time tuning the value of G and B, the result for force tracking (F_act vs F_des) is not the same as below:

Figure%203_Sine%20wave_force%20tracking.jpg
Figure%204_Square%20wave_force%20tracking.jpg
Figure%205_Sawtooth%20wave_force%20tracking.jpg

All the result is not followed/tracked the input. The value of G and B are 0.05 and 2 respectively.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are you trying to get the graphs to match as close as possible? It was not clear to me in your problem statement. Are those spikes due to something in the IF-THEN part of your control system, causing an abrupt change?
 
  • #3
Thanks for your response. My aim is to get the graph to be match as close as possible. If the output graph follow exactly the input graph, the the force tracking tuning will be true. The spikes may due the tuning of G and B values. IF-THEN rules is used to ensure the input current will be in between 0 to 0.9A. Do you have any idea how to tune the G and B value? Or need to change to PID controller?
 

Related to Tuning for force tracking in MR (Magneto-Rheological) dampers

1. What is a Magneto-Rheological (MR) damper?

A Magneto-Rheological (MR) damper is a type of suspension system used in vehicles to improve ride comfort and stability. It contains a fluid filled with tiny iron particles that can change its viscosity when subjected to a magnetic field, allowing for real-time adjustments to the damping force.

2. How does tuning affect force tracking in MR dampers?

Tuning refers to the process of adjusting the control parameters of an MR damper to achieve a desired force response. By tuning the damper, the force tracking ability can be improved, meaning the damper can more accurately and quickly respond to changes in road conditions.

3. What factors are involved in tuning for force tracking in MR dampers?

The main factors involved in tuning for force tracking in MR dampers include the control algorithm, the magnetic field strength, and the damping fluid properties. Other factors such as temperature and velocity can also impact the force tracking performance.

4. Why is force tracking important in MR dampers?

Force tracking is important in MR dampers because it allows for improved ride comfort and stability. By accurately tracking the force, the damper can adjust in real-time to changes in road conditions, providing a smoother and more controlled ride for the vehicle occupants.

5. What are some methods used for tuning force tracking in MR dampers?

There are several methods that can be used for tuning force tracking in MR dampers, including mathematical modeling, experimental testing, and optimization algorithms. These methods can be used individually or in combination to achieve the desired force tracking performance.

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
18K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
8K
Back
Top