- #1
Poorichard2
- 39
- 0
After reading over Sikz, FZ+, Eh and jammieg reply,I have been
reviewing the questions from other websites and sources.
Perhaps I have been leaning too much towards a Metaphysical theory
or idea then a conventionual one, a thin line perhaps? interesting?
yes. Reading Einstein's theory that gravity is space/time curvature
and Stephen Hawking's thoughts on the nature of space/time, I was
motivated to look into this line of thought much further to see if
it was possible to flush out conceptions that are and were ignored
as being too radical and not having proofs. I for one would not
throw away in my mind the theories of General Relativity merely for
some unproven theory. Thus I arrived upon the idea of making a mental
model, "Conceptional Cosmolgy" and begin with Space/Matter leaving
out "Time" and "Velocity" in order to bite into raw material, later
evolving or progressing towards Space/Time/Velocity but it was to be
a step by step process building an engine by first constructing the
block and progressing towards a unified power plant.
The construction for a "Conceptional Cosmology" model has begun,but
there lies some questions first.
What are your thoughts on:
A: Space/Matter as a unified Continuum?
B: Matter as the primary state?
C: Space as the secondary state?
If yes to the above three questions what would the next most
important addition be? if no on anyone of the above,why?
D: Your Comment.
Thank you for your help.
reviewing the questions from other websites and sources.
Perhaps I have been leaning too much towards a Metaphysical theory
or idea then a conventionual one, a thin line perhaps? interesting?
yes. Reading Einstein's theory that gravity is space/time curvature
and Stephen Hawking's thoughts on the nature of space/time, I was
motivated to look into this line of thought much further to see if
it was possible to flush out conceptions that are and were ignored
as being too radical and not having proofs. I for one would not
throw away in my mind the theories of General Relativity merely for
some unproven theory. Thus I arrived upon the idea of making a mental
model, "Conceptional Cosmolgy" and begin with Space/Matter leaving
out "Time" and "Velocity" in order to bite into raw material, later
evolving or progressing towards Space/Time/Velocity but it was to be
a step by step process building an engine by first constructing the
block and progressing towards a unified power plant.
The construction for a "Conceptional Cosmology" model has begun,but
there lies some questions first.
What are your thoughts on:
A: Space/Matter as a unified Continuum?
B: Matter as the primary state?
C: Space as the secondary state?
If yes to the above three questions what would the next most
important addition be? if no on anyone of the above,why?
D: Your Comment.
Thank you for your help.