Traveling in an Expanding Universe

In summary, the conversation touches on the subject of cosmology and the hobbyist's lack of formal education in the field. The question posed is whether a galaxy moving away from another at a speed greater than the speed of light can still be reached while traveling at slightly more than 1/4 the speed of light. The response mentions Hubble's Law and its relation to recession velocity and distance, as well as the concept of relative velocities in General Relativity. The conversation also delves into the possibility of traveling to distant galaxies and the implications of the expanding universe and the accelerating expansion of space. The final answer is that Hubble's constant is not a constant, but its value remains relatively constant over time.
  • #1
JWINC
1
0
For starters let me say that reading about and pondering cosmology is only a hobby, I have no formal education in this arena, although I am returning to school this spring to do just that. That being said, the following query may be foolish for some basic reasons I have missed, or not come upon yet, but I would be happy to know what they are.

For the sake of this question let us say that the Milky Way Galaxy is at the center of a sphere, the sphere being our expanding universe. As we draw a radial line from the center of the sphere (A) out to its face our line passes through 5 other galaxies (B,C,D,E,F). Each of these galaxies are separated by each other by a decent amount of space, say 10 billion light years, and measures a red shift to its nearest galactic neighbors sufficient to put their speed of separation at 1/4 the speed of light.

Galaxy A being the Milky Way, here are the 6 galaxies connected by a straight line each uniformly spaced.
A----B----C----D----E----F

My understanding is that since we on A measure a redshift of X to B and B measures a redshift of X to C we on A measure a redshift of 2x to C. Therefor we on A would measure a redshift of 5x to F, and since X=1/4 the speed of light galaxy F is "moving away" from A at a speed greater than the speed of light?

If that is the case then even though F is "moving away" from A at greater than the speed of light it is still possible to travel from A to F while moving at only slightly more than 1/4 the speed of light?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
That's just about right. What you need here is Hubble's Law:

[tex]v=Hr[/tex]

where v is the recession velocity of a distant object (one of your galaxies), H is Hubble's constant, and r is its distance. This famous relation indicates that recession velocities grow with distance (more space is expanding between distant objects than objects close together, or, as Gertrude Stein would say, "there's more there there.") You'll notice that there is a distance, r= c/H, at which distant objects begin to recede at light speed. This is perfectly fine and consistent with relativity. Each galaxy is locally at rest (not moving relative to the background spacetime -- this is best visualized by drawing a grid, placing galaxies at points on the grid, and then stretching the grid to simulate expansion). So, there will be no problem with you traveling to one of these far off galaxies. Eventually you will reach a distance from your starting point at which your destination galaxy is no longer receding at light speed.
 
  • #3
Very interesting. This prompts the question: is H constant. When B moves with the Hubble flow to the position of C when we started, is it now moving with twice the velocity?

Related question: in special relativity, Einstein tossed out the notion of simultaneity. How does that work in GR? What does it even mean to say "the position of C when we started"?

Just trying to wrap my head around this.
 
  • #4
The primary issue here is that the there is no strict way to determine the relative velocities of far-away objects. Yes, this is one way to talk about the velocity between, say, galaxy A and galaxy F. And by this definition, yes, most visible galaxies in our universe always are (and always have been) moving away at faster than the speed of light.

But I could merely change coordinates and end up with there being no relative velocity at all (e.g. if my coordinates move along with the expansion: galaxy F is always just as many grid points away from galaxy A as it always was).

In fact, relative velocities are only well-defined in General Relativity at a single point. This means that you can definitively say that galaxies A and F are not outrunning any light rays that pass by them. But you can't say they're not outrunning light rays that are far away.
 
  • #5
Just a thought from another hobbyist: Is this really 'compatible'...??
JWINC said:
Each of these galaxies are separated by each other by a decent amount of space, say 10 billion light years, and measures a red shift to its nearest galactic neighbors sufficient to put their speed of separation at 1/4 the speed of light.
bapowell said:
So, there will be no problem with you traveling to one of these far off galaxies. Eventually you will reach a distance from your starting point at which your destination galaxy is no longer receding at light speed.
To me it looks like JWINC is talking about the observable universe (46 bly), and bapowell is talking about the Hubble volume (13.8 bly)...?

Surely, there must be galaxies in the observable universe which we can never 'travel' to, or??
 
Last edited:
  • #6
DevilsAvocado said:
Surely, there must be galaxies in the observable universe which we can never 'travel' to, or??
Provided that there is actually a cosmological constant, yes, even light rays sent out from the Earth today can never reach many galaxies that we can see.
 
  • #7
Chalnoth said:
Provided that there is actually a cosmological constant, yes
Okay, thanks Chalnoth. And I take it, since the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_Cosmology_Project" has shown that there is not only an expansion, but an accelerating expansion – the 'traveling' gets even tougher...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
The accelerated expansion is actually necessary for there to be places in the observable universe that will forever be out of reach.
 
  • #9
Independent of the speed of the traveler?

Edit: Stupid question, forget it. You are talking about c, right?
 
  • #10
DevilsAvocado said:
Independent of the speed of the traveler?

Edit: Stupid question, forget it. You are talking about c, right?
Yes :)
 
  • #11
hehe... :blushing:
 
  • #12
pixchips said:
Very interesting. This prompts the question: is H constant.
No. It's proportional to the energy density of the universe, and hence is a function of time; however, it's effectively a constant: it's value today is going to be just about its value 100 years from now.

Related question: in special relativity, Einstein tossed out the notion of simultaneity. How does that work in GR? What does it even mean to say "the position of C when we started"?
I don't think this adds any complication, as long as we establish a frame of reference. If you are an observer comoving with the expansion, and galaxy C is as well, then the distance between yourself and galaxy C is just the proper distance. No need to worry about issues of simultaneity.
 
  • #13
can any particle in our universe travell faster than the speed of light ? sir i heared that some time it is found that some paticals are found which emits the rays & speed of rays is 4 times than the speed of light ? sir some time we say that no body can run faster than the light sir i am in totally confusion please email me my answer via email and solve my tension
 
  • #14
mehul ahir said:
can any particle in our universe travell faster than the speed of light ?
Rule #1: Absolutely nothing can exceed the speed of light, moving in space.
Rule #2: Space itself has no speed limit.

Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light" for more info.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related to Traveling in an Expanding Universe

What is an expanding universe?

An expanding universe refers to the concept that the universe is constantly growing and stretching outwards. This expansion is believed to have started with the Big Bang and is continuing to occur.

How does an expanding universe affect travel?

As the universe expands, the distances between objects in space also increase. This means that it would take longer to travel to distant galaxies or other celestial bodies. However, the expansion of the universe does not significantly impact travel within our own solar system.

Can we travel faster than the expansion of the universe?

No, the expansion of the universe occurs at a constant rate and it is currently not possible for any known form of travel to exceed this rate. This means that it is not possible to travel faster than the expansion of the universe.

Will the expansion of the universe ever stop?

It is currently unknown if the expansion of the universe will eventually stop or continue indefinitely. The rate of expansion is determined by the amount of matter and energy in the universe, so it is possible that the expansion could slow down or even reverse in the future.

How does the expanding universe impact our understanding of time and space?

The concept of an expanding universe has greatly influenced our understanding of time and space. It has led to the theory of relativity, which explains how time and space are interconnected and can be affected by gravity and the expansion of the universe. It has also helped scientists understand the origins and evolution of the universe.

Similar threads

B Can the "creation" of space in the Universe affect the speed of light?
    • Cosmology
Replies
7
Views
722
I Questions about the Location of the Big Bang and the Age of the Universe
    • Cosmology
Replies
8
Views
734
B What is the Universe expanding into?
    • Cosmology
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Clarification on how old the Universe is
    • Cosmology
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Expansion of Space: Exploring the Rate Between Galaxies
    • Cosmology
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
B Bound Systems in an Expanding Universe: How Can Galaxies Merge?
    • Cosmology
Replies
9
Views
2K
I What if the Universe expands faster than the speed of light?
    • Cosmology
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Sachs-Wolfe effect in a Dark Energy universe?
    • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Expansion of the Universe and the cosmological principle
    • Cosmology
Replies
9
Views
2K
A Evolution of radio sources mimics a non-expanding universe
    • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top