You know what they say, a cat has three names: the first being the name his master calls him, for example let's say "Ralph"; the second being his scientific name, i.e., Felis catus?; and the third being the name that nobody knows but the cat himself? Or, would this just be another name for the "cat's meow?"
To have three names is one thing, but no one ever claimed my cat to have any counterparts outside and insist that he was in fact them and that they were him.
Yes, this is heretical. And, although I don't think it's improper to view the holy trinity as three aspects of the "same being," it's just another way for the church to confuse the masses and hold sway over them. Once again, something with which common sense or reason should apply, the church corrupts in order to serve its own ends.
Doesn't sound any less plausible than calling Him the Son of God. In fact whether He's the Father or the Son, He's the closest thing there is on Earth to the Father, and may just as well be ... I guess?
I think if you were to address Jesus with the awe and respect you would towards "the supernatural," that would probably suffice or, perhaps even as your "best buddy" or someone you might look up to? The last thing I think He expects though, is for people to "suck up to Him."
And yet by virtue of the fact that He appears "in the flesh" (as Son or God), suggests the message may have less to do with God, than with the way we treat each other as human beings?
. one in three, three in one, believe whatever your pastor tells you and be good little sheep. or just don't go to church, read your bible, and make your own decisions on what it means, like me .The idea of "God as our grandfather" is meant to be taken as a funny thought or joke. It is not meant to be taken seriously or as a statement of religious belief.
The concept of "God as our grandfather" is not related to traditional religious beliefs. It is a humorous and unconventional idea that is not meant to be taken as a serious theological concept.
Some religious groups may consider the thought of "God as our grandfather" to be blasphemous as it goes against traditional beliefs and may be seen as disrespectful towards God. However, it is ultimately up to individual interpretation and belief.
The purpose of this thought is to challenge traditional beliefs and encourage people to think about God in a new and humorous way. It is not meant to offend or disrespect anyone's religious beliefs.
No, this thought cannot be explored in a scientific manner as it is not based on scientific evidence or principles. It is simply a humorous thought and not a scientific theory.