- #1
hholzer
- 37
- 0
Given the two vector fields:
[tex]
\vec E and \vec B
[/tex]
Where the first is the electric vector field
and the second is the magnetic vector field, we
have the following identity:
[tex]
curl(\vec E) = -\frac{\partial \vec B } { \partial t }
[/tex]
and further that:
[tex]
curl(curl(\vec E)) = curl(-\frac{\partial \vec B } { \partial t })
= -\frac{\partial curl(\vec B) } {\partial t }
[/tex]
I tried to prove these by defining the vector fields:
[tex]
\vec E = C\frac{ \mathbf e_r } {p^2}
[/tex]
and
[tex]
\vec B = <0, 0, B>
[/tex]
where C and B are constants. But I ended up with
zero for curl(E), which cannot be right. So my reasoning
is in error somewhere.
Any insight appreciated.
[tex]
\vec E and \vec B
[/tex]
Where the first is the electric vector field
and the second is the magnetic vector field, we
have the following identity:
[tex]
curl(\vec E) = -\frac{\partial \vec B } { \partial t }
[/tex]
and further that:
[tex]
curl(curl(\vec E)) = curl(-\frac{\partial \vec B } { \partial t })
= -\frac{\partial curl(\vec B) } {\partial t }
[/tex]
I tried to prove these by defining the vector fields:
[tex]
\vec E = C\frac{ \mathbf e_r } {p^2}
[/tex]
and
[tex]
\vec B = <0, 0, B>
[/tex]
where C and B are constants. But I ended up with
zero for curl(E), which cannot be right. So my reasoning
is in error somewhere.
Any insight appreciated.