The co-moving frame - acceleration, momentum and velocity

In summary: If it reads zero in my frame, it reads zero in your frame. If it reads 9.8 m/s^2 in my frame, it reads 9.8 m/s^2 in your frame. Because the definition of proper acceleration is that number that an accelerometer reads, it follows that the proper acceleration is the same in all frames. A comoving frame is one where the four-velocity is constant. An accelerating frame is one where the four-velocity is not constant. This is not a coincidence.In what frame is this seen to be an Hyperbola? Is it in the laboratory (inertial) frame? In
  • #1
Drew Carey
10
0
Hi all,
I'm having trouble with the concept of a co-moving frame, specifically in the context of constant proper-acceleration (hyperbolic motion). I feel like I don't "get it"; and perhaps this is related to some deeper misunderstandings I may have regarding the definitions of certain quantities in SR.
I would really appreciate it if someone could explain this in very plain words, specifically the following points:
  1. When speaking of trajectories in space-time as seen in a certain frame. What exactly do mean by this when relating to the co-moving frame? It is my intuitive understanding that in this frame the particle/observer lays at the origin for all values of tau, there can be no trajectory which isn't identically zero. What are we talking about when saying that in this frame the trajectory is a hyperbola?
  2. How is the acceleration defined in a co-moving frame, if by definition in this frame the velocity is constant? It would seem to me that the derivative of the velocity wrt proper time should vanish in this frame.
  3. Does a body have momentum in it's co-moving frame? That would seem to contradict that fact that the velocity is null, as 4-momentum and 4-velocity are always simply related. On the other hand, if we have proper acceleration, then we have proper force, and the momentum should be changing. How do we settle the definitions of momentum and velocity in this case?
  4. I've seen the relation stating that the 4-velocity and 4-acceleration are always perpendicular. To my understanding, the 4 velocity is just the "velocity of the world line", in other words the velocity of the trajectory wrt to the path parameter - correct? If the world line is a straight line in space time (for example), how can the acceleration be perpendicular to the velocity? That would suggest a change in the path direction. Or am I confusing the definitions here?
These seem like enough for a start. Thanks a lot for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The comoving frame is not one singled out frame for all of the world line. However, for each point on the world line, you can find an inertial frame where the tangent vector is (1,0,0,0).
 
  • #3
In the comoving frame, velocity and momentum are always zero.

In the comoving frame, the coordinate acceleration dv/dt is therefore also always zero. It will not be zero in other frames; because v is defined as dx/dt and both x and t are frame-dependent, dv/dt is also frame-dependent. The proper acceleration, which is the the value that an accelerometer would read, is not necessarily zero and will be the same in all frames whether comoving or not.

The four-velocity is not much like a regular velocity. Its magnitude is ##c## in all frames always no matter the state of motion of the object; its direction is always tangent to the world line of the object. Because the magnitude of the four-velocity is constant the four-acceleration must be perpendicular to the four-velocity; otherwise the magnitude would change.

And you are right that because the four-acceleration is perpendicular to the four-velocity, a non-zero four acceleration implies a change in direction. But that's the direction in four-dimensional space-time, not three-dimensional space. An accelerating spaceship is moving in a straight line in three dimensional space but a hyperbolic path in four-dimensional space-time.

By far the easiest way to visualize all this is to practice drawing some space-time diagrams, in which the trajectory of the object is plotted on a graph with the x coordinate on the horizontal axis and the t coordinate on the vertical axis.
 
  • #4
Thanks a lot for taking the time to reply. I would like to delay on each one of your paragraphs if you don't mind:

Nugatory said:
In the comoving frame, velocity and momentum are always zero.
By this do you mean the 3-velocity and 3-momentum? How do you settle the following equation?:
##f^{\alpha}=m\frac{d^{2}x^{\alpha}}{d\tau^{2}}=ma^{\alpha}=m\frac{du^{\alpha}}{d\tau}##

If in the co-moving frame I have:
##u^\alpha=(1,0,0,0)##
##a^\alpha=(0,\vec{a})##

How do you differentiate the velocity to obtain the acceleration in the co-moving frame?

Nugatory said:
The proper acceleration, which is the the value that an accelerometer would read, is not necessarily zero and will be the same in all frames whether co-moving or not.
Can you please elaborate on this statement? To my understanding, an accelerometer measures force, which is itself a 4-vector, transforming between Lorentz frames. The proper accelerating being the value of this in one specific frame (co-moving/proper frame). What do you mean by being constant in every frame?

Nugatory said:
An accelerating spaceship is moving in a straight line in three dimensional space but a hyperbolic path in four-dimensional space-time.
In what frame is this seen to be an Hyperbola? Is it in the laboratory (inertial) frame? In other words, when sketching the world line of the spaceship (which is easy enough to do I suppose, if you're measuring it's spatial location at every moment), who sees the hyperbola? Surely it's not in the co-moving frame where the spaceship always measures it's location to be the origin?

Thanks again!
 
  • #5
Drew Carey said:
By this do you mean the 3-velocity and 3-momentum? How do you settle the following equation?:
##f^{\alpha}=m\frac{d^{2}x^{\alpha}}{d\tau^{2}}=ma^{\alpha}=m\frac{du^{\alpha}}{d\tau}##

If in the co-moving frame I have:
##u^\alpha=(1,0,0,0)##
##a^\alpha=(0,\vec{a})##

How do you differentiate the velocity to obtain the acceleration in the co-moving frame?
I do indeed mean the three-velocity and the three-momentum, and I do the differentiation the old-fashioned way: I start with the position as a function of time ##x(t)##, differentiate once to get the velocity ##v(t)=x'(t)## as a function of time, then differentiate that to get the coordinate acceleration ##a(t)=v'(t)=x''(t)## as a function of time. If we're using the coordinates of a comoving frame, ##x(t)## is a constant (not necessarily zero, although it is so convenient to choose the coordinate origin that way that you'll seldom see anything else) so all of its derivatives are zero.
To my understanding, an accelerometer measures force, which is itself a 4-vector, transforming between Lorentz frames. The proper accelerating being the value of this in one specific frame (co-moving/proper frame). What do you mean by being constant in every frame?
The accelerometer has to produce the same results in all frames (pause now for the mandatory reminder that "in that frame" is a sloppy substitute for the more precise "using coordinates assigned by that frame"). Otherwise we'd have the impossible situation where its output would read differently according who was looking at it.

A simple model of an accelerometer is a box containg a weight suspended by six springs from the six inside faces of the box. If the box is accelerated, the forces in the springs will change to overcome the inertia of the weight, so measuring these forces is a measurement of the proper acceleration of the box.

In what frame is this seen to be an Hyperbola? Is it in the laboratory (inertial) frame? In other words, when sketching the world line of the spaceship (which is easy enough to do I suppose, if you're measuring it's spatial location at every moment), who sees the hyperbola? Surely it's not in the co-moving frame where the spaceship always measures it's location to be the origin?

Yes, the world line is a hyperbola of you use x and t coordinates assigned by an inertial frame.
 

Related to The co-moving frame - acceleration, momentum and velocity

What is the co-moving frame?

The co-moving frame is a reference frame that moves along with a specific object or system, making it appear stationary. It is often used in the study of relativity and cosmology.

How is acceleration defined in the co-moving frame?

In the co-moving frame, acceleration is defined as the change in velocity over time of an object or system. This is similar to the definition of acceleration in a non-accelerating reference frame, but with the added consideration of the frame of reference moving along with the object or system.

What is the difference between momentum in the co-moving frame and the rest frame?

Momentum in the co-moving frame is defined as the product of an object's mass and its velocity in the co-moving frame, while momentum in the rest frame is defined as the product of an object's rest mass and its velocity in the rest frame. The difference lies in the fact that the co-moving frame takes into account the motion of the reference frame, while the rest frame does not.

How does velocity change in the co-moving frame?

In the co-moving frame, velocity is relative to the reference frame. This means that the velocity of an object or system in the co-moving frame can change depending on the motion of the reference frame. However, if the reference frame is moving at a constant velocity, the velocity of the object or system in the co-moving frame will also remain constant.

What are some practical applications of the co-moving frame?

The co-moving frame is commonly used in astrophysics and cosmology to study the motion and behavior of objects in the universe. It is also used in the study of relativity to better understand the effects of different reference frames on physical phenomena. Additionally, the concept of the co-moving frame has practical applications in fields such as aerospace engineering and navigation.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
607
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
954
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
144
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
78
Views
5K
Back
Top