The attraction between every two objects

  • Thread starter Khadar Mariano
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Attraction
In summary: Essentially, the further apart the objects are, the weaker the force of attraction between them. This was first discovered by Kepler, Galileo, and Newton through their observations and experiments. The inverse square law is a result of living in a three-dimensional world, where the strength of an interaction is divided among more points as the distance increases. This is why it is squared, as the strength is inversely proportional to the distance squared. This concept is crucial in understanding the behavior of gravity in our universe. In summary, the inverse square law explains the relationship between the distance and strength of attraction between two objects, and was first discovered by Kepler,
  • #1
Khadar Mariano
2
0
There is an attraction between every two objects,the strength of the the attraction is directly proportional with the masses of the to objects and indirectly proportional with the distance between the two objects squared, so where this is square came from, why not only distance. :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Khadar,
You can blame at least three individuals for that. Kepler, with his laws of planetary motion, Galileo, who changed the world view on heliocentrism and of falling objects, and Newton who came up with the law of universal gravitation.

As you have said, the attraction is proportional to the masses of the objects. Double the mass and the force of attraction also doubles, no problem there.

But double the distance. Well, we logically assume it should vary inversely, but how - inversely to distance, to distance squared, maybe distance cubed, or even some other power. To find out we can do some experiment and vary the distance and measure the force. It turns out the force is indirectly proportional to distance squared.

In Newton's words “I deduced that the forces which keep the planets in their orbs must [be] reciprocally as the squares of their distances from the centers about which they revolve: and thereby compared the force requisite to keep the Moon in her Orb with the force of gravity at the surface of the Earth; and found them answer pretty nearly." ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitation

Mathematically, if we take a certain size sphere1 of diameter r, and then double the radius to obtain another sphere2 with radius 2r, the surface area of sphere2 will be found to be 4 times the surface area of sphere1. Since we live in a 3-D world or universe, gravity also behaves the same way - the strength of gravity will also follow the inverse square law.
 
  • #3
IMO, the last paragraph in 256bits' post is the most important for getting an intuitive understanding as to the why. Let me repeat my elaboration on this topic from an earlier thread(https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=697273):


As far as the inverse sqare law goes, that's the result of the world being (spatially) three-dimensional.
It's easy to see why, when you begin by considering a source of whatever you want(e.g., radiation, force) in one-dimensional space.

So, we've got a line(1d space) with a point-like source located somewhere on it. The source is causing some sort of interaction to propagate from it in all directions. In 1d space, that means all the output is divided equally between the two directions. Whichever point on the line you choose, no matter how distant from the source, the strength of the interaction measured there will always be the same as at any other point, and equal to half the source strength. There's nowhere else for the interaction to dissipate but being split in half.
So in such a space, e.g. the gravitational force would not have [itex]\frac{1}{R^2}[/itex] in it. It would have no [itex]R[/itex] at all, as the strenght is distance independent.

Now let's take a 2d space(a plane). In this case, the interaction propagates in the form of expanding circles centered around the source. If you pick one point somewhere on the plane, you'll find out that the interaction has been spread thinner, as the same amount of it needs to cover more space. At any given distance [itex]R[/itex], there are [itex]2\pi R[/itex] points that equally share the original interaction between them. Since the interaction has to be divided between all the points on the circle with size dependent on an [itex]R[/itex] variable, the force of gravity would have the factor [itex]\frac{1}{R}[/itex] in it.

Three-dimensional space adds another dimension into which the interaction must spread, so that at any given distance R there is [itex]4\pi R^2[/itex](concentric spheres) points sharing what the source had produced. Hence the [itex]\frac{1}{R^2}[/itex] factor in the equations.
 
  • #4
thank you guys
 
  • #5


I can explain the concept of gravitational attraction between two objects using Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. This law states that the force of attraction between two objects is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

The reason for the square in the equation is due to the nature of gravity itself. Gravity is a force that acts over a distance, and the strength of this force decreases as the distance between two objects increases. However, this decrease is not linear, but rather follows an inverse square law. This means that as the distance between two objects doubles, the force of gravity decreases by a factor of four (2 squared). Similarly, if the distance is tripled, the force decreases by a factor of nine (3 squared).

This inverse square relationship is a fundamental property of gravity and has been observed through various experiments and observations. It is also reflected in other natural phenomena, such as the intensity of light or sound waves, which also follow an inverse square law.

In summary, the square in the equation for gravitational attraction is a result of the nature of gravity and reflects the decrease in force with distance. As scientists, we use this law to accurately describe and predict the behavior of objects in the universe.
 

Related to The attraction between every two objects

1. What is the force of attraction between two objects?

The force of attraction between two objects is known as gravitational force. It is dependent on the masses of the two objects and the distance between them. The larger the mass of the objects and the smaller the distance between them, the stronger the force of attraction.

2. How does the distance between two objects affect their attraction?

The distance between two objects directly affects their attraction. According to the law of universal gravitation, the force of attraction decreases as the distance between the objects increases. This means that the closer the objects are to each other, the stronger their attraction will be.

3. What is the difference between gravitational force and electromagnetic force?

Gravitational force is the force of attraction between two objects with mass, while electromagnetic force is the force between electrically charged particles. Gravitational force is always attractive, while electromagnetic force can be attractive or repulsive depending on the charges of the particles involved.

4. How does mass affect the attraction between two objects?

The larger the masses of the two objects, the stronger their gravitational attraction will be. This is because the force of gravity is directly proportional to the masses of the objects. Objects with larger masses will have a greater gravitational pull on each other.

5. Can the force of attraction between two objects change?

Yes, the force of attraction between two objects can change. It is dependent on the masses of the objects and the distance between them, so any changes in these factors will result in a change in the force of attraction. For example, if the mass of one object increases, the force of attraction between it and another object will also increase.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
618
Replies
4
Views
887
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top