- #1
luckis11
- 272
- 2
The antenna cable tranfers only the 3 frequencies of green, red and blue, yes or no?
luckis11 said:The antenna cable tranfers only the 3 frequencies of green, red and blue, yes or no?
luckis11 said:The antenna cable tranfers only the 3 frequencies of green, red and blue, yes or no?
luckis11 said:I see that: "Your search for "television" returned 3,468 articles".
link please?
luckis11 said:IF the screen radiates only the 3 frequencies of the red, green, blue, then the frequency of the yellow is formed before or after the eye? Please correct the previous "IF" (if false), and give me the correct answer.
(no links please, I've read a multitude, none of them explained it, I want your own answer).
luckis11 said:I am asking what actually happens in the actual space between the tv and the eye, which has nothing to do with that triangle.
To help with all those acronyms,jtbell said:
D H said:NTSC = National Television Systems Committee but also "not the same color",
D H said:To help with all those acronyms,
NTSC = National Television Systems Committee but also "not the same color",
PAL = Phase Alternating Line but also "pay and learn",
SECAM = Séquentiel couleur à mémoire but also "shows every color all murky".
Those alternative definitions hint at some of the issues with those analog formats.
In other words, yellow happens in the brain.berkeman said:In the space between the TV and the eye, nothing special happens. Photons are photons -- they do not interact to make new "colors" of photons, if that's what you are asking.
This does not make sense. Colours do not interfere with each other.luckis11 said:You mean that between the screen and the eye the green frequency and the red frequency have their own space and do not interfere resulting in the frequency of the yellow? (What's the proof for that?)
luckis11 said:Or what are you saying?
luckis11 said:By "yellow frequency" I meant "the frequency of the yellow". Therefore according to you, you are wrong as much as I was, as you said my nonsense was that "the frequency IS yellow", whereas you also said "the light IS yellow".
But you did not answer me: What's the proof that the R+G light does not become Y light before the eyes. When you photograph the screen, the area is again yellow.
There is no yellow coming from the TV; there is no yellow reaching the eye. There is red, green and blue. Yellow occurs in the brain.luckis11 said:By "yellow frequency" I meant "the frequency of the yellow".
I did not say nonsense; I said "does not make sense". Frequencies of light do not interfere to produce new frequencies. If you'd like to reword that, feel free.luckis11 said:Therefore according to you, you are wrong as much as I was, as you said my nonsense was that "the frequency IS yellow", whereas you also said "yellow light"<=>"the light IS yellow".
The onus is not on me to teach grade 9 physics; it is accepted knowledge. If you have learned enough about optics that you choose to reject it for an alternate theory, PF has a forum where you can submit your paper.luckis11 said:But you did not answer me: What's the proof that the R+G light does not become Y light because of intereference before it reaches the eyes?
Your eyes see yellow. That does not mean yellow is there.luckis11 said:When you photograph the screen, the area on the photograph is again yellow.
Apart from the laws of physics - an LCD projector with a color wheel that shows separate R,G,B images at different times, the red and green photons don't exist at the same time.luckis11 said:But you did not answer me: What's the proof that the R+G light does not become Y light because of intereference before it reaches the eyes?
luckis11 said:Actually you are putting words in my mouth, saying that I have an alternate theory.
I think you are misunderstanding the role of PF and its members. The onus is not on us to "prove" any challenge you happen to throw at us.luckis11 said:I just asked for the proof.Then you say "it is accepted knowledge" whereas I asked for the proof for that knowledge.
And that "I should read the optic books". Why do you bother answering me at all and not say "This is so elementary optics, that you should find the answer yourself in the books". Well, I can't find it that's why I am asking.
Well great. Hope you don't tick off too many more people on your journey.luckis11 said:From all you said, this sounds like a proof, so thanks for the hint:
"A prism is not fooled. A prism will separate the TV light into r g and b."
Television has a significant impact on the environment due to the energy consumption and waste generated during production, use, and disposal of televisions. This includes the use of non-renewable resources, emission of greenhouse gases, and electronic waste.
To make television more environmentally friendly, companies can use sustainable materials in production, improve energy efficiency, and implement recycling programs for electronic waste. Consumers can also make eco-friendly choices by purchasing energy-efficient televisions and properly disposing of old ones.
Green, red, and blue are the primary colors used in television technology. They represent the three primary colors of light that are combined to create a full range of colors on a television screen. This process is known as additive color mixing.
Colors can have a significant impact on our viewing experience on television. Bright and vibrant colors tend to be more stimulating and can capture our attention, while cooler colors like blue and green can be more calming. The choice of colors can also affect the mood and emotions conveyed in a television program or advertisement.
The color of a television screen can affect its energy consumption. For example, brighter colors may require more energy to produce, while darker colors may use less energy. This is why some televisions have energy-saving modes that adjust the brightness and color settings to reduce energy consumption.