Whose War: Examining the True Motives Behind America's Involvement in Iraq?

  • News
  • Thread starter Carlos Hernandez
  • Start date
In summary, the invasion of Iraq by the United States in 2003 was motivated by a combination of factors, including a desire to counter terrorism and spread democracy, as well as securing access to oil resources. However, evidence suggests that these reasons were not the primary drivers of the war, with other factors such as personal vendettas and political agendas playing a significant role. The true motives behind America's involvement in Iraq are still a subject of debate and controversy, but it is clear that the decision to go to war was not solely based on the stated justifications.
  • #1
Carlos Hernandez
84
0
March 24, 2003 issue
Copyright © 2003 The American Conservative

Whose War?

A neoconservative clique seeks to ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interest.

by Patrick J. Buchanan

The War Party may have gotten its war. But it has also gotten something it did not bargain for. Its membership lists and associations have been exposed and its motives challenged. In a rare moment in U.S. journalism, Tim Russert put this question directly to Richard Perle: “Can you assure American viewers ... that we’re in this situation against Saddam Hussein and his removal for American security interests? And what would be the link in terms of Israel?”

Suddenly, the Israeli connection is on the table, and the War Party is not amused. Finding themselves in an unanticipated firefight, our neoconservative friends are doing what comes naturally, seeking student deferments from political combat by claiming the status of a persecuted minority group. People who claim to be writing the foreign policy of the world superpower, one would think, would be a little more manly in the schoolyard of politics. Not so.

Complete text at http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Watch yourself...while I agree that America's entanglement with the Middle East is problematic(putting it mildly), let's not slip into anti-Semitic conspiracy theories here. The lousy neocon conspiracies are true and frightening enough.
 
  • #3
Originally posted by Zero
Watch yourself...while I agree that America's entanglement with the Middle East is problematic(putting it mildly), let's not slip into anti-Semitic conspiracy theories here. The lousy neocon conspiracies are true and frightening enough.

I didn't write the article. My opinion has always been that space aliens are responsible for all of our problems.

Carlos Hernandez
 

1. What is the main thesis of "Whose War? by Pat Buchanan"?

The main thesis of "Whose War? by Pat Buchanan" is that the United States' involvement in the Iraq War was driven by the interests of a small group of neoconservative policymakers, rather than being in the best interest of the American people.

2. Who does Pat Buchanan blame for the Iraq War?

Pat Buchanan primarily blames a group of neoconservative policymakers, including Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and William Kristol, for pushing for the invasion of Iraq and promoting the idea of American global dominance.

3. How does Pat Buchanan argue against the reasons given for the Iraq War?

Pat Buchanan argues that the reasons given for the Iraq War, such as the presence of weapons of mass destruction and the need to spread democracy, were exaggerated or false. He also asserts that the real motivation for the war was to further the neoconservative agenda of American hegemony.

4. Does Pat Buchanan believe that the Iraq War was a mistake?

Yes, Pat Buchanan believes that the Iraq War was a mistake and argues that it has had negative consequences for both the United States and the Middle East. He believes that the war was unnecessary and that the justifications for it were based on faulty intelligence and misguided ideology.

5. How does "Whose War? by Pat Buchanan" relate to current events and foreign policy?

Although "Whose War? by Pat Buchanan" was published in 2003, its arguments and criticisms of American foreign policy are still relevant today. The book serves as a cautionary tale against interventionist policies and the influence of special interests in shaping foreign policy decisions. It also highlights the potential consequences of pursuing a unilateral, aggressive approach to international relations.

Similar threads

News The War Party's Secret Agenda: Unveiled by Patrick J. Buchanan
    • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
News Should the US intervene in world problems?
    • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top