- #1
jvicens
- 1,422
- 2
While reading the book " Cosmic Catastrophes. Supernovae, Gamma-Ray Bursts and Adventures in Hyperspace" by J.Craig Wheeler I came across this line:
"By the happenstance of the nature of the strong nuclear force among protons and neutrons, the fifty-six particles of an iron nucleus are more tightly bound together than in any other element (with the possible exception of a couple of exotic elements like rare isotopes of nickel, which cannot easily be formed in bature)."
The question I have is what makes iron nucleus the most tightly bounded nucleus? Is the answer related to the semi-empirical analysis done by Weizsacker in 1935 on binding energy?
"By the happenstance of the nature of the strong nuclear force among protons and neutrons, the fifty-six particles of an iron nucleus are more tightly bound together than in any other element (with the possible exception of a couple of exotic elements like rare isotopes of nickel, which cannot easily be formed in bature)."
The question I have is what makes iron nucleus the most tightly bounded nucleus? Is the answer related to the semi-empirical analysis done by Weizsacker in 1935 on binding energy?