Is there a prediction for the frequency of a gravity wave?

In summary: "ask a scientist" feature. you send in a question and theytry to find a scientist who knows and will answer it.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
is it known how much gravitational force is needed to deflect a photon from its true path?
is there a prediction for the frequency of a gravity wave?
apart from the graviton are there other in vogue thories for the propogation of gravity?
can gravity be deflected?
does the speed of gravity change when traveling different mediums?
when light is deflected around the gravity of a planet,does the light follow the contours of the planet
a lot of questions, but searching the net has drawn a blank so any info on relevant sites would be appreciated...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2


Originally posted by wolram
is it known how much gravitational force is needed to deflect a photon from its true path?
...
when light is deflected around the gravity of a planet,does the light follow the contours of the planet
a lot of questions, but searching the net has drawn a blank so any info on relevant sites would be appreciated...

When light passes a pointmass it is bent by an angle
which (expressed in radians) can be calculated from the mass M
and the distance R of closest approach.

The formula for the angle of deflection is

4GM/c^2 divided by R

For the sun, GM/c^2 is a bit less than a mile (around 1.5 km).

So 4GM/c^2 is something under 4 miles (around 6 km)

So if a ray of light passes within 600,000 km of the center of the sun, then it gets bent by an angle of E-5 radians----ten microradians.

This is just 6 km divided by 600,000 km.

BTW this 4GM/c^2 length is interesting, it is the diameter of an equal mass generic (non-rotating) black hole. So a black hole with same mass as the sun would have diameter of 6 km. That is, twice the Schw. radius, the diameter of the event horizon, which from an outsider's viewpoint is a good index of the diameter of the thing.
 
  • #3
webreference for that light-bending formula

http://www.livingreviews.org/Articles/Volume1/1998-12wamb/node2.html

This webpage is about the formula 4GM/c^2 divided by R


the light-bending formula is historical, in 1913 Einstein came up with the first version which had a 2 in place of the 4, and in 1914 some people went to a place in Russia to observe an eclipse and check it but war broke out and they were prevented

then in 1916 Einstein completed Gen Rel and got the right formula for light-bending, with the 4, and as soon as the war was over in 1919 another team, led by Eddington, observed an eclipse and checked it to within a 20 percent margin of error.

this was big news. it was the second confirmation of Gen Rel and made a big splash in the media

BTW you say "how much gravitational force" but the usual
idea is that the light is not feeling any force but is just going along a ("straight" = geodesic) line. So I should imagine that anything that goes in straight lines at lightspeed would be deflected the same way as light, following the curvature in the neighborhood of a massive object. So a planar gravity wave, if it's propagating at the same speed as light, would be deflected the same amount. Maybe someone else wants to correct or confirm this.
 
  • #4
The frequency of the gravity waves would depend entirely upon the phenomenon that produced them. One of the Current "Great Challenges" facing modern computational science is the prediction of what types of gravity waves (wave signatures) would be produced by different cosmic events. I seem to recall reading that there is a global team led by a doctor Suen (sp?) to predict these wave signatures, so that LIGO can look for them.

As I understand it, then main events for which they are trying to predict wave signatures are the collision of black holes, and the final spiral of a neutron star into a black hole.

Of course, I read that article about a year ago (I think), and these wave signatures may already be known now.

As for gravity waves being slowed by the medium through which they pass, it is currently theorized that no medium impedes their progress. This is one of the great proposed advantages to gravity wave astronomy; a source of radiation that cannot be "blocked" by intervening dust or gas or other interference.
 
  • #5
Good writing, marcus. Is it the event horizon or the Schwartzschild radius where photons may be bent into a shell around a black hole? (I believe that shell marks a symmetry between the spacetimes within and without.)

That gravity propagates at the speed of light was only just recently demonstrated.

"Branes" were hypothesized to conduct gravity directly (short-circuit dimensions) compared to the actual spacetime travel of light waves. (Conflict with previous mentioned measurement?)
 
  • #6
Originally posted by Loren Booda
...Is it the event horizon or the Schwartzschild radius where photons may be bent into a shell around a black hole...

The Schwartzschild radius is 2GM/c^2.

The radius of the "photon sphere" is 3GM/c^2.

In theory it is at the latter distance that light can circle round the black hole. Nice thought, light in orbit.

I think these formulas for the radius of the event horizon and the photon sphere apply only in the "vanilla" case of a non-rotating black hole. I'll see what there is on the web about it, but there is probably someone here who knows and can speak with more assurance.
 
  • #7
gravity

thanks for interesting replies, I am really into gravity, but its hard to come up with info that you guys find easily ,where do you get it from? who is or are the fore most publishers on gravity related papers
 
  • #8


Originally posted by wolram
thanks for interesting replies, I am really into gravity, but its hard to come up with info that you guys find easily ,where do you get it from? ...

Ned Wright's cosmology site at UCLA

John Baez physics site at UCR (UC Riverside)

You asked "where do you get..." so anybody can answer and
everybody's answers are probably different.

Ned Wright's site is incredible. I had better get you the url

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm

google

nature.com/nsu/

Nature magazine has "Science News Update"
with latest research of all kinds and a keyword SEARCH box.

Also a kind of strange site I just came across on google

http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/

This is Andrew Hamilton's homepage.
He likes pictures, gravity, color-vision, relativity, computer animations. Oxford maths undergrad, University of Virginia
astrophysics, a special talent for simpatico explanation
(or is that merely my impression?)
 

1. What exactly is a gravity wave?

A gravity wave is a disturbance in the fabric of space-time, caused by the acceleration of massive objects. It is often compared to ripples on a pond, but instead of water, it is the curvature of space that is being disturbed.

2. How are gravity waves different from electromagnetic waves?

Gravity waves and electromagnetic waves are fundamentally different in nature. Unlike electromagnetic waves, which are disturbances in the electromagnetic field, gravity waves are ripples in the fabric of space-time. Additionally, gravity waves travel at the speed of light, just like electromagnetic waves, but they interact with matter very weakly, making them difficult to detect.

3. Is there any evidence for the existence of gravity waves?

Yes, there is strong indirect evidence for the existence of gravity waves. For example, the observation of the Hulse-Taylor binary system, which consists of two neutron stars orbiting each other, has shown a decrease in orbital period over time, consistent with the emission of energy in the form of gravity waves. Additionally, the recent detection of gravitational waves by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) provides direct evidence for their existence.

4. Can we predict when and where gravity waves will occur?

Currently, we do not have the capability to predict when and where gravity waves will occur. This is because they are a result of unpredictable events, such as the collision of two massive objects or the collapse of a massive star. However, with advancements in technology and further research, it is possible that we may be able to predict the occurrence of gravity waves in the future.

5. How does the frequency of a gravity wave affect its detection?

The frequency of a gravity wave plays a crucial role in its detection. Lower frequency waves, such as those emitted by massive objects like black holes, can be detected by ground-based detectors like LIGO. Higher frequency waves, such as those emitted by smaller objects like neutron stars, require more sensitive detectors, such as space-based detectors like the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). Therefore, the frequency of a gravity wave determines the type of detector needed for its detection.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
681
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
335
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
837
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
862
  • Beyond the Standard Models
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top