Is Saddam's strategy effective against foreign invaders?

  • News
  • Thread starter schwarzchildradius
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Strategy
In summary, the Iran-Iraq war ended inconclusively and Gulf War I saw the defeat of the Republican Guard by British and American forces. However, Saddam and his forces have now resorted to guerrilla tactics, similar to the Taliban in Afghanistan, to resist foreign invaders. There is speculation about Saddam's whereabouts and the possibility of his death, but the main issue at hand is the lack of strategy from the occupying forces. Bin Laden is also mentioned in relation to his recent videos and the ongoing war in Iraq. It is predicted that Iraq may stabilize within 5 years, despite the ongoing resistance and lack of support for the US.

How do you rate Saddam's strategy?

  • Very effective - will crack coalition and destroy American economy

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Effective - will cause coalition to exit Iraq within 1 year

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Moderately effective - will cause early exit of coalition within 7 years

    Votes: 3 37.5%
  • Not effective - terrorism will die out within 4 years with no change in US policy

    Votes: 3 37.5%
  • Wild card- Saddam will use WMD with devastating effects

    Votes: 1 12.5%

  • Total voters
    8
  • #1
schwarzchildradius
The Iran-Iraq war ended in an inconclusive way, and the Republican Guard was beaten back from Kuwait by the British and Americans in Gulf War I. But today, the story is different. Saddam and his forces have attacked the allied strategy, dissolving into the general polulation and striking in operations similar to the resistance of the Taliban to the Russian invaders of Afghanistan.
Eventually, Saddam may drive the coalition out, unless the Militia runs out of ammunition first. How do you rate Saddam's strategy for dealing with foreign invaders?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hey, we don't even know if Saddam is still alive! Of course, long term it isn't so much about resistance strategy, as it is about the occupying force's complete lack of a strategy.
 
  • #3
I suppose it's possible that Saddam is dead but then you'd think that it would be common knowledge in Baghdad. Even with the man out of the picture the US still has problems, with fundamentalists.
There's one wacko theory that goes Saddam has been dead for 2 years now. I bet he's still alive, conducting the escalating guerilla war he has planned for years against this predictable invasion.
 
  • #4
And what about bin Laden? He hasn't made any more of those videos recently, and he looked pretty bad in the last one. Could it be?
 
  • #5
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
And what about bin Laden? He hasn't made any more of those videos recently, and he looked pretty bad in the last one. Could it be?

You mean other than the one released a couple of months ago where he was hiking around some rugged mountain trails?
 
  • #6
"Saddam" (anti-US resistance) will use stashed conventional explosives (having planned not to resist the main US assault), continue terrorist bombings and raids, but diminish their support base and effectiveness as a result of moderate Shiite identity and US persistance. Iraq may stabilize within 5 years.

(I do not support this war.)
 

1. What was Saddam's strategy against foreign invaders?

Saddam's strategy against foreign invaders was to use a combination of military force, propaganda, and diplomacy to deter and defeat any potential invaders.

2. Did Saddam's strategy effectively protect Iraq from foreign invaders?

It can be argued that Saddam's strategy was effective in protecting Iraq from foreign invaders during his rule, as Iraq did not face a direct invasion from a foreign power. However, this strategy ultimately failed when the United States and its allies invaded Iraq in 2003.

3. How did Saddam's strategy compare to previous Iraqi leaders?

Saddam's strategy was similar to previous Iraqi leaders, who also relied on a strong military and propaganda to protect their country from foreign invaders. However, Saddam's regime was known for its brutality and use of chemical weapons, which set it apart from other rulers.

4. Was Saddam's strategy considered successful by his supporters?

Yes, Saddam's supporters viewed his strategy as successful in protecting Iraq from foreign invaders and maintaining his grip on power. However, critics argue that his strategy ultimately led to the downfall of his regime and the devastation of Iraq.

5. Did Saddam's strategy have any long-term consequences for Iraq?

Yes, Saddam's strategy had significant long-term consequences for Iraq. The heavy emphasis on military spending and propaganda left the country economically and socially weakened. Additionally, the use of chemical weapons and other human rights abuses during his regime had lasting effects on the country and its people.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
193
Views
20K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
Back
Top