This world is full of misery and agony, does it make us to be a stronger person?

  • Thread starter Saint
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the role of misery in human evolution and how it may serve as an adaptation to environmental pressures. Negative emotions like misery and guilt may also balance or moderate other emotions to discourage dangerous behavior. The conversation also touches on the relationship between misery and suicide, and the potential impact of misery on modern societies. It is suggested that modern survival and materialistic lifestyles may contribute to the growing level of misery in modern societies.
  • #1
Saint
437
0
This world is full of misery and agony, does it make us to be a stronger person? Without misery, does it mean we can not know what is happiness?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Misery is thought to be an evolutionary adaptation to environmental pressures. For example, depression is speculated to be among other things a means of encouraging wounded animals to seek out a quiet place, rest, and lick their wounds. In addition, negative feelings like misery, guilt, etc. may work to balance or moderate other emotions like anger to discourage dangerous behavior.

Of course, subjectively we might say it certainly seems like overkill, but we could say the same thing for physical pain. Why does it have to hurt so much when we get a stupid sun burn much less a serious wound? The answer seems to be, this is simply what promotes survival of the species.

As you suggest, our capactity for reasoning and consciousness themselves may also be dependent upon our emotional lives. Our emotions give us contexts which abstract thought and reasoning may ultimately be based on. This has some evidence to support it, but a great deal more research needs to be done on the subject.
 
  • #3
Sad thing is misery can overcome a person's will of living and resort to committing suicide.
 
  • #4
Originally posted by Saint
Sad thing is misery can overcome a person's will of living and resort to committing suicide.

Not to sound trite, but your statement is dripping with irony and the circular logic. It is precisely because we can feel sad and conceive of suicide as sad, that people can commit suicide. If they were incapable of feeling sad, they would never be able to commit suicide because they were miserable.
 
  • #5
Originally posted by Saint
This world is full of misery and agony, does it make us to be a stronger person?

It can. It depends on how you respond to it, I guess.

Without misery, does it mean we can not know what is happiness?

No, we can know happiness without having known misery. However, we might appreciate happiness a bit more, after having been miserable for a while.
 
  • #6
Greetings !
Originally posted by wuliheron
Misery is thought to be an evolutionary adaptation to environmental pressures. For example, depression is speculated to be among other things a means of encouraging wounded animals to seek out a quiet place, rest, and lick their wounds. In addition, negative feelings like misery, guilt, etc. may work to balance or moderate other emotions like anger to discourage dangerous behavior.

Of course, subjectively we might say it certainly seems like overkill, but we could say the same thing for physical pain. Why does it have to hurt so much when we get a stupid sun burn much less a serious wound? The answer seems to be, this is simply what promotes survival of the species.

As you suggest, our capactity for reasoning and consciousness themselves may also be dependent upon our emotional lives. Our emotions give us contexts which abstract thought and reasoning may ultimately be based on. This has some evidence to support it, but a great deal more research needs to be done on the subject.
Intresting reading wuli, I agree.

In light of the above, would you say that the apparent (?)
growth of misery in modern societies reflective of the
assumed by the individual modern standards of survival -
life style ?

Live long and prosper.
 
  • #7
Originally posted by drag
Greetings !

Intresting reading wuli, I agree.

In light of the above, would you say that the apparent (?)
growth of misery in modern societies reflective of the
assumed by the individual modern standards of survival -
life style ?

Live long and prosper.

Studies among lottery winners have indicated, as you might expect, that after an initial high they might return to somewhat normal levels of happiness, but in the long run maintain a benefit in longevity. In this same vein, Buddhists who practice meditation have been shown to have more activity in the frontal lobes. These two extremes, of searching for external support and internal support, has their distinctive advantages and disadvantages. Exactly what they might be is a matter of extensive research dating back to antiquity.
 
  • #8
Originally posted by wuliheron
Studies among lottery winners have indicated, as you might expect, that after an initial high they might return to somewhat normal levels of happiness, but in the long run maintain a benefit in longevity. In this same vein, Buddhists who practice meditation have been shown to have more activity in the frontal lobes. These two extremes, of searching for external support and internal support, has their distinctive advantages and disadvantages. Exactly what they might be is a matter of extensive research dating back to antiquity.
I don't believe that answered my question. I was
refering to the seemingly relativly growing misery
in modern societies compared to other societies in the past
(due to factors like greater population and greater population
density as well as much greater legislative control over
the population in modern societies and also, primarily -
like you said in your message, due to survival and its
seemingly more standarized and limmited perspective of
modern time - a high level material life-style).

Or, I'll shortly rephrase that again - according to what you
said about misery serving a role in survival. Do you think
that the seemingly growing level of misery today is reflective
of what we consider as modern survival ?

Also, do you think that this misery may be a prime factor
in possible radical changes in modern societies of the future ?

Live long and prosper.
 
  • #9
Originally posted by drag
I don't believe that answered my question. I was
refering to the seemingly relativly growing misery
in modern societies compared to other societies in the past
(due to factors like greater population and greater population
density as well as much greater legislative control over
the population in modern societies and also, primarily -
like you said in your message, due to survival and its
seemingly more standarized and limmited perspective of
modern time - a high level material life-style).

Or, I'll shortly rephrase that again - according to what you
said about misery serving a role in survival. Do you think
that the seemingly growing level of misery today is reflective
of what we consider as modern survival ?

Also, do you think that this misery may be a prime factor
in possible radical changes in modern societies of the future ?

Live long and prosper.

The level of misery is not known scientifically, we are only now beginning to learn how to measure such subjective things objectively. However, it is a well documented fact that people from the developed world are often quite surprised at how happy people even on the verge of starvation tend to be in the third world.

I experienced this myself as a child living in spain over thirty years ago. The pace of life in small towns everywhere is famous for being much slower and gentler in general than in the big city. However, this involves a clear trade off.

Bottom line, people in more affluent countries live longer and appear willing to sacrifice some of their happiness in order to do so. This is, however, simply a rough preliminary assessment. Studies have also shown that people who have little control over their work tend to die younger and more comprehensive studies will certainly paint a more complex picture.

Such studies imply that human happiness may be as flexible as any number of other traits. For example, people are genetically adapted to live either a sedate or hard working lifestyle. We can laze around all day like a mountain gorilla or work from sun up to sun down every day of our lives and it has little impact on our health, people merely need about twenty minutes of vigorous walking a day to stay relatively healthy.

Ignoring accidents, our genes, the food we eat, and the polutents we absorb seem to have more impact on our longevity statistically than the overall levels of happiness. However, again, this picture may simply be due to the lack of serious objective numbers on the issue.
 
  • #10
The world is also full of happiness, joy, and goodness - people just don't like to acknowledge, remember, or appreciate that part of life.
 
  • #11
why misery

__________________________________________________________
This world is full of misery and agony, does it make us to be a stronger person? Without misery, does it mean we can not know what is happiness?
____________________________________________________________


No, but sometimes.

No.
 
  • #12
Originally posted by Tiberius
The world is also full of happiness, joy, and goodness - people just don't like to acknowledge, remember, or appreciate that part of life.

Happiness is not like the air we breath, it ain't ubiquitous and unavoidable. People can be as vicious and discontent as a rabid dog or as content and affectionate as a suckling babe. The reason unhappiness gets our attention is the same reason violence gets our attention... survival. Those who don't pay attention tend not to survive.
 
  • #13
Originally posted by Saint
This world is full of misery and agony, does it make us to be a stronger person? Without misery, does it mean we can not know what is happiness?
Without the capacity to suffer, we wouldn't have the capacity to be happy, neither would we know the difference. The key is in dicovering what that happiness is (in relation to suffering), in order that we might work towards its fulfillment.
 

1. How does experiencing misery and agony make us stronger?

Experiencing difficult and painful situations can push us to our limits, forcing us to adapt and learn new coping mechanisms. This can ultimately lead to personal growth and resilience, making us stronger individuals.

2. Can everyone become stronger through adversity?

While everyone has the potential to become stronger through adversity, it also depends on individual factors such as mindset, support systems, and resources. Some people may find it easier to bounce back from hardships than others.

3. Is there a limit to how much misery and agony a person can handle?

There is no definitive answer to this question as each person's threshold for pain and suffering is unique. However, studies have shown that humans are generally more resilient than we think and can often handle more than we give ourselves credit for.

4. Can constantly experiencing misery and agony have negative effects on a person?

Yes, prolonged exposure to negative experiences can have detrimental effects on a person's mental and physical well-being. It is important to have a balance and seek help when necessary to prevent long-term negative impacts.

5. Are there any benefits to experiencing misery and agony?

While it may be difficult to see in the moment, experiencing difficult situations can lead to personal growth, increased empathy and resilience, and a deeper appreciation for the good things in life. It can also help us develop problem-solving skills and a better understanding of ourselves and others.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • General Discussion
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
49
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
716
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
157
Replies
1
Views
827
Back
Top