Your Aerodynamics are all Screwed Up

  • Thread starter XP3Scorpion
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Aerodynamics
In summary, the conversation discusses the principles of aerodynamics and how they relate to nature and the design of objects that travel through various environments. The conversation also touches on the use of spoilers on cars and the efficiency of different shapes in terms of energy transfer. The conversation ends with one participant making outlandish claims about their own personal experience with energy efficiency and their invitation to speak at a technology conference.
  • #1
XP3Scorpion
Your Aerodynamics are all Screwed Up!

Rule #1) Never should the small end of an object that is intended to travel through a viscous (sticky & elastic) environment e.g. air, water, electromagnetic-spectrum etc... precede the larger end, to do so places the moving object in opposition to natures cyclonic properties i.e. any object that has a smaller point in the front and a larger tail section in the rear is 180-degrees out of phase with the environment.

Comprehend and Copy Nature!

Anatomically speaking nature is female, and as such certain rules do apply.

Note: When a bird lays an "egg" the large end always proceeds the smaller end, otherwise the vaginal orifice can not "squeeze" the egg and expel it from the birthing canal. Said squeezing translates into either constructive or destructive force depending on the direction of the geometrical structure i.e. the shape of the object traveling through the environment, large end preceding the smaller tapered end thereby allowing the air, water, electromagnetic properties inherent within the environment to squeeze the object from an anterior location e.g. from back to front and not the other way round, which would initialize an antagonistic force against force, nature ultimately being the larger force.

Spoilers

In general the use of a spoiler on a car was intended to squeeze a jet of air from in-between the under surface of the wing and that of the car body, whereby practice drag in the form of eddy/vortices is pushed further away downstream form the rear of the car so as not to be allowed to pull backwards and thus detract from the overall froward travel of the vehicle. It should be borne of mind thou that is a brut force upon brut force measure, and as such goes against complementary energy transference technology. Remember parasitic drag is induced via the forward motion of the vehicle through the air. Therefor geometrical shapes plays a major role on the selective placement of the "squeeze-energy" either beneficially or antagonistically depending upon the shape of the craft.

This is where the "coke-bottle" shape of a supersonic platform and the area rule design come into play...

Oh! You think I'm wrong?

Then please explain to me how I managed to obtain 3-times my normal mileage driving in excess of 70-mph and how I managed to obtain between 100-and-590-mpg driving a sustained speed of 65-mph, applying the same principles cited above. http://quantumgravitics.tripod.com/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Birds don't have vaginas.

- Warren
 
  • #3
Unless I'm misunderstanding you, what you're saying in the first part doesn't sound a whole lot different from what we already know: a teardrop shape is the most efficient subsonic shape. The second part about spoilers though is wrong: spoilers exist to "spoil" lift, not reduce drag.

Your claims about that van getting 100mpg, however are absolutely absurd.
 
  • #4
Originally posted by russ_watters
Your claims about that van getting 100mpg, however are absolutely absurd.
Oh come on man.. check it out!

http://quantumgravitics.tripod.com//sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/riwfueltest.jpg

If that ain't the solution to the world's energy problems, I don't know what is!

- Warren
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Originally posted by XP3Scorpion
Then please explain to me how I managed to obtain 3-times my normal mileage driving in excess of 70-mph and how I managed to obtain between 100-and-590-mpg driving a sustained speed of 65-mph

You filled up the tank with cold fuel from an underground tank, drove 20 miles and refilled it. Then went 59 miles, refilled, and have outrageoud MPG claims.

Ever just put your lawnmower's gas can in the sun after you've filled the mower and then to refill again? Ever had vapor lock after topping off you tank?

Cliff
 
  • #6


Originally posted by Cliff_J
You filled up the tank with cold fuel from an underground tank, drove 20 miles and refilled it. Then went 59 miles, refilled, and have outrageoud MPG claims.
Come on now, Cliff. This site isn't about that science baloney.

- Warren
 
  • #7
Oh wow...

my first "move to TD" thread ever!

I feel so special.

*pushes button*
 
  • #8
Originally posted by russ_watters
...Your claims about that van getting 100mpg, however are absolutely absurd.
But look! I've found an error. He says
59 miles @ 0.1 tenths of a gallon = 590-mpg!
0.1 tenths of a gallon is actually 0.01 gallon. So the actual fuel consumption rate is 5900 mpg! Wow. Now we're talking.
 
  • #9
Where can I buy one?
 
  • #10
2004 Extraordinary Technology Conference

Hello! :biggrin:

Everybody looks like Ill be attending the conference hosted by TeslaTech and the Institute of New Energy.

Steven R. Elswick of Extraordinary Technology Magazine has invited me to attend their prestigious technology conference. I will discus Vortex Mechanics Free Energy and the RIW of course Ill bring the QEG-circuit too working or not.

2004 Extraordinary Technology Conference :shy:

--- Conference Session 6 --- Alternative Energy Technology 2:30pm: Robert A. Patterson

http://www.teslatech.info/ttevents/2004conf/prgframe.htm Program Menu


http://www.teslatech.info/ttevents/2004conf/program11.pdf PDF article

Thank You

Robert A. Patterson
Engineering Specialist
http://quantumgravitics.tripod.com/
 

1. What does it mean when someone says "Your Aerodynamics are all Screwed Up"?

When someone says this, it means that the aerodynamics of a particular object, such as a vehicle or aircraft, are not functioning properly. This can lead to decreased performance and potentially dangerous situations.

2. What can cause someone's aerodynamics to be "screwed up"?

There are several factors that can contribute to poor aerodynamics, including incorrect design, damage to the object, or external factors such as wind or air pressure. In some cases, human error or improper maintenance can also lead to screwed up aerodynamics.

3. How can screwed up aerodynamics be fixed?

The solution to fixing aerodynamics depends on the specific issue at hand. In some cases, making repairs or adjustments to the object can improve its aerodynamics. In other cases, redesigning or modifying certain features may be necessary. It is important to consult with experts and conduct thorough testing before implementing any changes.

4. How do screwed up aerodynamics affect performance?

Poor aerodynamics can greatly impact the performance of an object. It can lead to increased drag, reduced speed and maneuverability, and decreased fuel efficiency. In extreme cases, it can even result in accidents or crashes. It is important to address any issues with aerodynamics in order to maintain optimal performance and safety.

5. How can one prevent their aerodynamics from getting "screwed up" in the first place?

The best way to prevent screwed up aerodynamics is to properly design and maintain the object. This includes conducting thorough testing and analysis during the design process, as well as regular maintenance and inspections. It is also important to consider external factors, such as weather conditions, when operating the object. Consulting with experts and following proper protocols can help prevent issues with aerodynamics.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
3
Replies
82
Views
23K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top