3pi/Lambda = area of cosmological horizon

In summary: I wrote an expert in quantum gravity about this.It turns out there is an underlying connection between the two numbers, so this is probably not so interesting. It could be,but probably isnt.The ratio of 1/Λ the reciprocal cosmo. constant and the area of the horizon has to be2/3 divided by the dark energy fraction of rho crit and divided by the square of the radius factor (Robservable/RHubble)This radius factor (Robservable/RHubble) is commonly taken to be 3, which squared is 9. And the value of the dark energy fraction of rho crit derived from current observation(WMAP) is 0.73.So the relations between 1/Λ and the
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
It just turns out that the dark energy density Λ or cosmological constant is of such a size that

3pi/Λ = the surface area of the observable universe

Smolin calls the surface of the observable universe "the cosmological horizon" and treats it in the same paragraphs with black hole event horizons. Both are kinds of horizons. According to LQG both sorts of areas must be integers when expressed in natural units ("quantized in steps of the Planck area")

Also according to LQG the reciprocal of Λ is quantized.
Smolin says that 6pi/Λ must be an integer. It is the dimension of some finite dimensional Hilbert space important in quantum cosmology.

The usual figure for the (current) radius of the observable is about 40 billion lightyears. So the cosmological horizon is this expanding spherical surface with (current) area 7.3E123
And meanwhile 3pi/Λ turns out to be currently the same 7.3E123

The cosmological horizon is receding at about 3c (Ned Wright's tutorial has a good explanation, its also in the FAQ). No connection is assumed between Lambda and the area, at least by me, but the coincidence of the two numbers is striking and if they are connected then, since the area is expanding this means Lambda is diminishing----asymptotic to zero----a declining rate of acceleration leading to continued expansion (but no longer noticeably accelerating expansion)

Smolin has a good survey of QG

arXiv:hep-th/0303185

quite recent, John Baez reviewed it in his latest column
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I wrote an expert in quantum gravity about this.
It turns out there is an underlying connection between the two numbers, so this is probably not so interesting. It could be,
but probably isnt.

The ratio of 1/Λ the reciprocal cosmo. constant and the area of the horizon has to be

2/3 divided by the dark energy fraction of rho crit and divided by the square of the radius factor (Robservable/RHubble)

This radius factor (Robservable/RHubble) is commonly taken to be 3, which squared is 9. And the value of the dark energy fraction of rho crit derived from current observation(WMAP) is 0.73.
So the relations between 1/Λ and the area of the horizon has to be 2/3 divided by 9 and divided by 0.73.
So it looks like it might be just a temporary coincidence that these numbers are of the same magnitude. Or so it seems for now.










Originally posted by marcus
It just turns out that the dark energy density Λ or cosmological constant is of such a size that

3pi/Λ = the surface area of the observable universe

Smolin calls the surface of the observable universe "the cosmological horizon" and treats it in the same paragraphs with black hole event horizons. Both are kinds of horizons. According to LQG both sorts of areas must be integers when expressed in natural units ("quantized in steps of the Planck area")

Also according to LQG the reciprocal of Λ is quantized.
Smolin says that 6pi/Λ must be an integer. It is the dimension of some finite dimensional Hilbert space important in quantum cosmology.

The usual figure for the (current) radius of the observable is about 40 billion lightyears. So the cosmological horizon is this expanding spherical surface with (current) area 7.3E123
And meanwhile 3pi/Λ turns out to be currently the same 7.3E123

The cosmological horizon is receding at about 3c (Ned Wright's tutorial has a good explanation, its also in the FAQ). No connection is assumed between Lambda and the area, at least by me, but the coincidence of the two numbers is striking and if they are connected then, since the area is expanding this means Lambda is diminishing----asymptotic to zero----a declining rate of acceleration leading to continued expansion (but no longer noticeably accelerating expansion)

Smolin has a good survey of QG

arXiv:hep-th/0303185

quite recent, John Baez reviewed it in his latest column
 

1. What is the significance of 3pi/Lambda in relation to the cosmological horizon?

The value of 3pi/Lambda is a calculation used to determine the area of the cosmological horizon, which is the boundary of the observable universe. It is derived from the cosmological constant (Lambda) and the mathematical constant pi.

2. How does the area of the cosmological horizon relate to the size of the universe?

The area of the cosmological horizon is directly proportional to the size of the observable universe. This means that as the area of the cosmological horizon increases, so does the size of the universe.

3. Can the value of 3pi/Lambda change over time?

Yes, the value of 3pi/Lambda can change over time as the universe expands. The cosmological constant (Lambda) is not a fixed value and has been observed to change over time, which in turn affects the calculation of the cosmological horizon's area.

4. Is the cosmological horizon the same for all observers?

Yes, the cosmological horizon is the same for all observers within the observable universe. However, as the universe continues to expand, the cosmological horizon may appear to move further away from different perspectives.

5. Does the calculation of the cosmological horizon's area have any practical applications?

The calculation of the cosmological horizon's area is primarily used in theoretical and observational cosmology to better understand the size and expansion of the universe. It can also help in predicting the future evolution of the universe and understanding the effects of dark energy.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
10K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top