- #1
maverick280857
- 1,789
- 4
Hi,
I have a question from Perkins:
I'm not sure I understand the line in boldface. If [itex]s_\pi = 1[/itex] then why is [itex]S_z = 0[/itex]?
Thanks!
I have a question from Perkins:
For neutral pions, the existence of the decay
[tex]\pi^{0} \longrightarrow 2\gamma[/tex]
proves that the pion spin must be integral (since Sy = 1) and that [itex]s_\pi \neq 1[/itex], from the following argument. It can be proved as a consequence of relativistic invariance that for any massless particle of spin s, there are only two possible spin substates, [itex]S_z = \pm s[/itex], where z is the direction of motion. Taking the common line of flight of the photons in the pion rest frame as the quantisation axis, the z-component of total photon spin in the above decay can thus have the values Sz = 0 or 2. Suppose [itex]s_\pi = 1[/itex]; then only [itex]S_z = 0[/itex] is possible, and the two-photon amplitude must behave under rotation like the polynomial [itex]P_{l}^{m}(\cos \theta)[/itex] with m = 0, where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the angle of the photon relative to the z-axis.
I'm not sure I understand the line in boldface. If [itex]s_\pi = 1[/itex] then why is [itex]S_z = 0[/itex]?
Thanks!