Solving for z with Complex Numbers

In summary: Okay, I am going to start from the beginning and start a new PS.Thanks.JeffIn summary, the conversation discusses the rules of complex arithmetic when raising a real number to a complex power. It is stated that the modulus of the answer is not affected by the imaginary part, but the amplitude can be any value. Examples are given to better explain the concept, but there is some confusion when dealing with equations consisting entirely of complex numbers. The conversation ends with an unresolved issue and the need for further clarification.
  • #1
Jeff Cook
41
0
All,

I understand by rules of complex math, that raising a real number to the power of a complex number, you simply drop the imaginary part; it is not affected at all. But what happens when you raise a real number to the power of an imaginary. For instance...

x = 2^3i - 2

Does x end up equal to zero or negative 2 in this example? Or something else altogether?

Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Jeff
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Got it from John Derbyshire in his book, "Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics." On page 333...

"If you raise a real number x to a complex power a + bi, the rules of complex arithmatic dictate the following. The modulus of the answer-how far it is from zero, as the crow flies--is x^a. It is not affected by b at all...the amplitude, however, might be anything at all."

Can you better explain?

Jeff

So the value of the
 
  • #3
Complex numbers are best written in exponential form

[tex]x+iy = re^{i\theta}[/tex]

then it is straight forward to see what's going on.
 
  • #4
Complex exponentials, like real exponentials, obey the relationship
[tex]\exp(a+b) = \exp(a)\cdot\exp(b)[/tex]
Thus
[tex]\exp(a+bi) = \exp(a)\cdot\exp(bi)[/tex]
The former term is a real number. Using Euler's formula on the latter term,
[tex]\exp(bi) = \cos b+i\sin b[/tex]
which is a point on the unit circle (i.e., its magnitude is one). Thus the magnitude of the complex exponential [itex]\exp(a+bi)[/itex] is simply [itex]\exp a[/itex]. However, the amplitude cannot be anything at all. The answer is very well defined.
 
  • #5
Okay, that makes things very clear...So, in my example...

x = 2^3i - 2

Where we have two real numbers, but one raised to an imaginary. x = -1? Is this correct?

Jeff
 
  • #6
No. Show us how you arrived at that answer and we will help you get to the correct answer.

Hint: With real numbers, one can use
[tex]a^b = \exp(b\log a)[/tex]
This works with complex exponentiation as well.
 
  • #7
Well, the answer negative one was a misunderstanding on my part. I have a new answer and if it's wrong, I hope you will be able to walk me through to the correct equation.

2^3i = exp(3i log(2))
= (1/8)i

X = (1/8)i - 2
= -2 + (1/8)i
= -2.125

Is that correct?

Jeff
 
  • #8
Oops, I forgot something important. Hold on one minute.

Jeff
 
  • #9
2^3i = exp(3i log(2))
= exp(2.079i)
= cos (2.079) + i sin (2.079)
= -.487 + .873i
= .386...

Is that correct?

Jeff
 
  • #10
And...

.386 - 2 = 1.614 = x
 
  • #11
Not quite correct. You are correct in stating

2^(3i) = -0.487 + 0.873i, but the following line,
= 0.386...

is not correct. 2^(3i) = -0.487 + 0.873i (to 3 decimals of precision) is the answer, and this answer is a complex number. A complex number, z, always consists of a "real part" and an "imaginary part" (note that this is just terminology): z = x + iy; x is the real part of z and y is the imaginary part. i is the imaginary unit such that i^2 = -1, of course. You can no more add the real and imaginary parts of a complex number than you can add the x and y component of a vector.

So, your expression,

x = 2^(3i) - 2 evaluates as
x = -0.487 + 0.873i - 2 = -2.487 + 0.873i

(Also, there is a slight subtlety in all of this, in that in stating some complex number z = exp(log(z)), you need to specify the "branch" of log(z) to make your result single valued. If we write [itex]z = r \exp(i \theta)[/itex], then [itex]\log(z) = \ln r + i \arg(z)[/itex], where [itex]\arg(z) = \theta + 2 \pi k[/itex], for any integer k. You need to specify that integer k, otherwise you will get infinitely many results for your answer. The answer above used k = 0.)
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Mute,

Thanks. I understand that part of it now. But I still have then a couple of other questions that come up. I will add a different example to better clarify things for me.

In the equation:

ln((-1-2za)+ -i) = (.5+0i) ln((-1 + Sqrt{8}) + 2i)

How would one go about solving for z, a real part of a complex number in an equation consisting entirely of complex numbers. I added the 0i in order to make the real numbers fully understandable as complex numbers.

Can you, or someone, help me now with this example. It is the source of my problem in getting this straight.

Thanks greatly!

Jeff
 
  • #13
Jeff Cook said:
Mute,

Thanks. I understand that part of it now. But I still have then a couple of other questions that come up. I will add a different example to better clarify things for me.

In the equation:

ln((-1-2za)+ -i) = (.5+0i) ln((-1 + Sqrt{8}) + 2i)

How would one go about solving for z, a real part of a complex number in an equation consisting entirely of complex numbers. I added the 0i in order to make the real numbers fully understandable as complex numbers.
You'd start in exactly the same way you would with real numbers- get rid of the logarithms:
[tex]ln(-1-2za- i)= ln(\sqrt{-1+ \sqrt{8}+ 2i})[/tex]
so
[tex] -1- 2za- i= \sqrt{-1+ \sqrt{8}+ 2i}[/itex]
Squaring both sides,
[tex]4za+ 4z^2a^2+ 4zai= -1+ \sqrt{8}+ 2i[/tex]
[tex]4a^2 z^2+ (4a+ 4ai)z+ (1- \sqrt{8}-2i)= 0[/tex]
Now solve that with the quadratic formula.


Can you, or someone, help me now with this example. It is the source of my problem in getting this straight.

Thanks greatly!

Jeff
 
  • #14
HallsofIvy said:
Now solve that with the quadratic formula.

Perhaps one should be careful of an extra solution?
 
  • #15
I'm not sure if using a quadratic equation is the best idea for this particular equation, as a = (1 / Sqrt {2})-1. This leads simply to one quadratic equation after another, on and on. I'll show.

log ((-1-2za) + -i) = (.5 + 0i) log ((- 2 + Sqrt {8}) + 2i)

0 = z^2 (4a^2) + z (4a + 4ai) + (1 - Sqrt {8} - 2i)

t = 4a^2

u = 4a + 4ai

v = 1 - Sqrt {8} - 2i

z = 1.7071068 - .8040405i +/- Sqrt {-3.5492065 + 5.4903320i)} / .6862915

I'll just show you one of the paths from here…

(.6862915 ((z +0i) - (1.7071068 - .8040405i)))^2 = -3.5492065 + 5.4903320i

And so I don't need to write out all the numbers…

f = .6862915
g = 1.7071068
h = -.8040405i

(f (2z-2g) -2h)^2 = -3.5492065 + 5.4903320i

((1.3725830z - 2.3431458) + 1.1036123i)^2 = -3.5492065 + 5.4903320i

Again the numbers are too long for me to write out, so…

j = 1.3725830
k = 2.3431458
l = 1.1036123

((jz - k) + li) (jz - k) + li) = -3.5492065 + 5.4903320i

(jz - k)^2 + 2li (jz - k) -1.2179602 = -3.5492065 + 5.4903320i

((jz - k)^2 - 1.2179602) + 2li (jz - k) = -3.5492065 + 5.4903320i

Which I believe by looking at it leads to another quadratic equation. Correct me if I am wrong. If you can solve z as a complex number going in this direction, please show me.

However, I took a different approach and went in the opposite direction. Starting again with the first equation…

log ((-1-2za) + -i) = (.5 + 0i) log ((- 2 + Sqrt {8}) + 2i)

Could you please check my math in what follows?

log (-1+ -i - 2za + 0i) = (.5 + 0i) log ((- 2 + Sqrt {8}) + 2i)

I assume for a moment that this came from a quadratic equation, as taking it in the opposite direction leads to many other quadratic equations. So…

-1+ -i + 2za + 0i = (- 2 + Sqrt {8} + 2i)^.5

or…

-1+ -i - 2za + 0i = (- 2 + Sqrt {8} + 2i)^.5

So,

2za + 0i = (-1+ -i) +/- Sqrt {- 2 + Sqrt {8} + 2i}

z + 0i * 2a + 0i = (-1+ -i) +/- Sqrt {- 2 + Sqrt {8} + 2i}

z = ((-1 + i) +/- Sqrt {-2 + Sqrt {8} + 2i}) / (2a + 0i)

z = ((-1 -i) +/- Sqrt {2i - 2 + Sqrt {8}}) / 2a

Now, because of the following…

(1+i)(1+i) = 1 + i + i -1 = 1 + 2i - 1 = 2i

z = (-b +/- Sqrt{b^2 - 2 + Sqrt {8}}) / 2a

Where…

a = (1 / Sqrt {2}) - 1

b = 1 + i

c = 1 / Sqrt {2}

Thus,

0 = z^2 ((1 / Sqrt {2}) + i^2) + -z (-1 - i) + 1 / Sqrt {2}

Rearrange…

z (-1 - i) - 1 / Sqrt {2} = z^2 (1 / Sqrt {2} + i^2)

-z - zi = 1 / Sqrt {2} + z^2 / Sqrt {2} + z^2i^2

-1 - i = 1 / zi Sqrt {2} + z / Sqrt {2} + zi^2

Divide both sides by i^2.

1 + i = zi / Sqrt {2} + zi^2 / Sqrt {2} + z

Divide both sides by i.

1 / -i + 1 = z / Sqrt {2} + zi / Sqrt {2} - zi

1 / -zi + 1 / z + i = 1 / Sqrt {2} + i / Sqrt {2}

1 / -zi + 1 / z + i = Sqrt {i)

i / z + 1 / z + i = Sqrt {i}

i / z + 1 / z = Sqrt {i} - i

i / z = -1 - Sqrt {i} + 1 / Sqrt {2} - I

Lastly, I get what appears as an identity of z, where z could be any number of possibilities if taken the other direction. However, in this direction, I get…

z = i (-1 - i / Sqrt {2} - i)^-1

But what does that equal? How to reduce this further? I am stuck here. The best I get is z = 0. But I have already added enough of my work and do not know if I have made it correctly even this far. Could someone help me out with this?

Thanks greatly!

Jeff
 

Related to Solving for z with Complex Numbers

1. What is the meaning of "to the power of an imaginary number"?

The power of an imaginary number is a mathematical operation where an imaginary number is raised to a real or complex exponent. It represents repeated multiplication of the imaginary number by itself, just like in regular exponentiation.

2. How do you calculate "to the power of an imaginary number"?

To calculate the power of an imaginary number, you can use the formula: a + bi to the power of n = (a + bi)^n = a^n + (na^(n-1)bi) + (n(n-1)a^(n-2)b^2/2!) + ... + b^n.

3. What is the result of raising an imaginary number to a power?

The result of raising an imaginary number to a power is a complex number. The real part of the complex number is the result of raising the real part of the imaginary number to the power, while the imaginary part is the result of raising the imaginary part of the number to the power.

4. Can an imaginary number be raised to any power?

Yes, an imaginary number can be raised to any power, including positive, negative, and fractional powers. However, the result of raising an imaginary number to certain powers may be a complex number with a non-zero imaginary part.

5. What is the purpose of "to the power of an imaginary number" in mathematics?

The power of an imaginary number has practical applications in various fields of mathematics, including complex analysis, signal processing, and electrical engineering. It is also used in solving mathematical problems involving complex numbers and in creating mathematical models for physical phenomena.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
821
  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top