I post the story yesterday in the biology forumMonique said:
A bull dike on a hunting expedition, or any member of the 1976 East German Women's Olympic Swim Team.ShawnD said:With men gone, who will open pickel jars?!
shawn i think you are unaware of the conspiracy of us men to make pickel jars damn so hard to open.ShawnD said:I'd tend to think women are getting nervous. With men gone, who will open pickel jars?!
Science does not make men obsolete. It is a common misconception that science is responsible for the decline of men in society. In reality, scientific advancements have benefited both men and women, and have not made either gender obsolete.
There is no scientific evidence to support the idea that science makes men obsolete. In fact, statistics show that men are still very much present and valued in the scientific community. While there may be a decrease in certain traditional male-dominated fields, this does not mean that men are becoming obsolete in society as a whole.
No, there is no basis in biology for the idea that science makes men obsolete. Biology does not dictate societal roles or gender dynamics. Scientific advancements and developments are a result of human curiosity and innovation, not biological determinism.
No, there are no benefits to society if men were to become obsolete due to science. Gender equality and diversity are essential for a healthy and functioning society. The idea of one gender becoming obsolete goes against the values of equality and inclusivity.
No, there is no truth to this fear. The idea that science will lead to the extinction of men is unfounded and based on false assumptions. Science is constantly evolving and adapting, and it is not a force that can dictate the existence or extinction of a particular gender.