- #1
mathdad
- 1,283
- 1
Most high schools in NYC have banned direct and indirect geometric proofs. Too many complaints from parents and schools in fear of a lawsuit decided to disregard proofs in geometry. Good idea? Bad idea?
Geometric proofs are a method of proving mathematical statements using logical deductions and the properties of geometric shapes and figures. They involve a series of steps that demonstrate the validity of a given statement.
There are a few reasons why NYC high schools may consider banning geometric proofs. One reason could be that they are seen as too difficult or time-consuming for students to learn and understand. Another reason could be to make room for other topics or subjects in the curriculum.
The potential benefits of banning geometric proofs could include freeing up time for other topics, reducing stress on students, and allowing for a more diverse curriculum. It could also potentially encourage students to think outside the box and approach problem-solving in different ways.
The potential drawbacks of banning geometric proofs could include losing an important analytical and problem-solving skill, as well as potentially limiting students' understanding of geometry and other mathematical concepts. It could also hinder students' ability to pursue careers in fields that heavily rely on geometry, such as engineering and architecture.
Yes, there could be a compromise between completely banning and keeping geometric proofs in NYC high schools. This could involve incorporating them into the curriculum in a more practical and applicable way, rather than just as a standalone topic. It could also involve providing additional support and resources for students who struggle with geometric proofs.