Second generation leptons muon & tau as quantum excitiation of electrons?

[bananan]

Second generation leptons muon & tau as quantum excitiation of electrons?

We know that in the hydrogen atom, the levels of the electron are quantized n=1, n=2, n=3 which can explain the ryderg constant and photon emission spectrum. the electron can be explained by a quantum wave function, and excited to higher levels, which when falls back to ground state, gives off photons of specific frequency.

Could the second and third generation lepton, the muon and tao lepton be formulated, with assistance of the koide mass formula, as some kind of excitation of the electron?

Does string theory for example able to model the muo and tau as n=2 and n=3, which decomposes to ground state, giving off other particles? What about preon theory?

In other words, in string theory, does the electron represent a stable ground state of the lepton, and the second and third generation represent quantized excitation of this ground state, which is why they are unstable? what about preon theory? in addition to leptons, what about quarks.

 

[eljose79]

I find this question very intriguing and worth exploring. The idea of second and third generation leptons being excitations of the electron is an interesting concept, but it is important to note that it is currently just a hypothesis and has not been proven or supported by any evidence.

Firstly, the concept of quantization in the levels of the electron in the hydrogen atom is well-established and has been extensively studied and validated through experiments. However, extending this concept to explain the properties of other particles, such as the muon and tau, is a complex and challenging task.

String theory is a popular theoretical framework that attempts to unify all the fundamental forces in nature, including gravity. It does offer a potential explanation for the existence of multiple generations of particles, as it suggests that these particles are different vibrational modes of tiny, vibrating strings. However, there is no clear evidence or consensus on whether string theory can accurately model the muon and tau as excitations of the electron.

Preon theory, on the other hand, is a more speculative theory that suggests that all particles are composed of even smaller, hypothetical particles called preons. While this theory has not gained much traction in the scientific community, it is possible that it could offer an explanation for the relationship between the different generations of leptons.

In short, while the idea of second and third generation leptons being excitations of the electron is an intriguing one, it is still just a hypothesis and requires further research and evidence to be validated. Both string theory and preon theory offer potential explanations, but they are still highly speculative and require more evidence to be accepted as valid theories. As scientists, it is important to approach these ideas with curiosity and skepticism, and continue to explore and test them through experiments and observations.

 

[denian]

I believe that the idea of second and third generation leptons being quantum excitations of electrons is an interesting concept, but it is not currently supported by any solid evidence or widely accepted theories. While the idea of quantized levels in the electron's energy can explain its behavior in the hydrogen atom, it is not clear how this can be applied to other particles.

String theory does propose the existence of higher dimensions and different vibrational modes of strings, which could potentially correspond to the different generations of leptons. However, this is still a theoretical concept and has not been proven experimentally.

Similarly, preon theory also suggests that leptons and quarks are made up of even smaller particles called preons. However, there is no experimental evidence to support this theory either.

In conclusion, while the concept of second and third generation leptons being excitations of electrons is intriguing, it is currently not supported by scientific evidence. More research and experimentation is needed to fully understand the nature of these particles and their relationships to each other.