Rocket Propulsion: Boosting 3.10T to 10K m/s

In summary, the rocket has an engine and fuel designed to produce an exhaust speed of 2800 m/s. If a different fuel and engine design could give an exhaust speed of 4600 m/s, what amount of fuel and oxidizer would be required for the same task?
  • #1
Jacob87411
171
1
A rocket for use in deep space is to have the capability of boosting a total load (payload plus the rocket frame and engine) of 3.10 metric tons to a speed of 10 000 m/s.

(a) It has an engine and fuel designed to produce an exhaust speed of 2800 m/s. How much fuel plus oxidizer is required?

(b) If a different fuel and engine design could give an exhaust speed of 4600 m/s, what amount of fuel and oxidizer would be required for the same task?

I honestly have no idea where to even start because this hasnt been gone over in class or in the book, so if anyone could just give me a basic idea of how to approach it it would be helpful
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Treat it like a momentum problem. Initial momentum is 0. Final momentum of the system must also be 0.
 
  • #4
No we haven't covered it but I read it but I still don't really understand the problem. The engine can produce a speed of 2800 and you need to know how much fuel is required to get it up to 10,000?
 
  • #5
What is the momentum of the rocket + payload after it has been accelerated to 10,000 m/s?
 
  • #6
Momentum=Mass * Velocity...So 3.1*10,000?
 
  • #7
Momentum is conserved. Prior to burning the fuel, call the momentum 0. What do you need to add to (3.1*10000) to get 0?
 
  • #8
Obviously -31,000...but its not -31,000 metric tons...

Is it the momentum caused from the engine that gives a speed of 2800 m/s...so

P=mv
-31,000=2800m, m=11.07
 
  • #9
you got it. -31000 metric tons m/s is the momentum of the fuel. When added to the momentum of the empty rocket, they equal 0 which is what the original momentum was. So you conserved momentum.

Then you divided the momentum (-31000) by the velocity (-2800 since it is in the direction opposite the rocket) and got 11.07 metric tons.
 
  • #10
Thats what I originally thought and put it as an answer but it says its wrong
 
  • #11
Is this webassign?

Becareful of your units. You computed it in metric tons. Is it asking for metric tons, or kilograms?

In webassign, the teacher has the option to enforce or not enforce significant digits. 10,000 has only 1 significant digit, so your answer should have the same.

How many tries do you get?
 
  • #12
Yes its webassign..It wants it in metric tons..ive used 3/5 and 2/5 on the first and second respectively
 
  • #13
I don't know what to tell you, unless its a significant figure issue. But you probably know from the other problems whether or not the teacher enforces sig figs.
 

Related to Rocket Propulsion: Boosting 3.10T to 10K m/s

1. How does rocket propulsion work?

Rocket propulsion works by using Newton's third law of motion, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. In a rocket, this is achieved by burning fuel and expelling it out of the back of the rocket at high speeds, creating thrust in the opposite direction and propelling the rocket forward.

2. What type of fuel is used in rocket propulsion?

The most common type of fuel used in rocket propulsion is a combination of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. These fuels are highly efficient and produce a lot of energy when burned, making them ideal for achieving high speeds in space.

3. How much thrust is needed to boost 3.10T to 10K m/s?

The amount of thrust needed to achieve a specific velocity depends on several factors, such as the weight of the rocket and its payload, the type of fuel being used, and the design of the rocket engine. However, to boost 3.10T (tonnes) to 10K m/s (kilometers per second), a significant amount of thrust would be required, likely in the range of millions of Newtons.

4. What challenges are faced in achieving rocket propulsion?

One of the main challenges in rocket propulsion is the high cost and complexity of developing and testing rocket engines and fuel systems. Additionally, the extreme conditions of space, such as high temperatures and vacuum, can also pose challenges for rocket propulsion systems.

5. How does rocket propulsion compare to other forms of propulsion?

Rocket propulsion is currently the most efficient and effective form of propulsion for space travel. It allows for high speeds and can carry large payloads, making it ideal for launching spacecraft and satellites into orbit. However, for shorter distances and lower velocities, other forms of propulsion such as electric or chemical engines may be more suitable.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
810
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
5K
Back
Top