Relativity of Simultaneity: Analyzing Wavelengths

In summary, relativistic simultaneity explanations don't mention the fact that one of the events may be red shifted and the other blue shifted, and by analysing wavelengths you could presumably work out whether the event was in reality simultanous or not.
  • #1
Nickelodeon
181
1
Am i right in thinking that relativistic simultaneity explanations tend not to mention the fact that one of the ‘simultaneous’ events may well be red shifted and the other blue shifted and by analysing wavelengths you could presumably work out whether the event was in reality simultanous or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No (or rather, you are correct that they don't mention it, but that's because it's wrong). There's no sense in which events are "really" simultaneous or not. And events can't be red-shifted or blue-shifted.

Light emitted at an event may be red-shifted or blue-shifted, but even two light pulses emitted from two sources at the same event may be Doppler shifted with respect to each other if the sources are in relative motion.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Nickelodeon said:
Am i right in thinking that relativistic simultaneity explanations tend not to mention the fact that one of the ‘simultaneous’ events may well be red shifted and the other blue shifted and by analysing wavelengths you could presumably work out whether the event was in reality simultanous or not.
This wouldn't work. For example, in the usual train car thought experiment, the light from the front of the car will be blue shifted and the light from the rear of the car will be red shifted for an observer in the car. But for an observer in the next car ahead both will be red shifted and for an observer in the next car behind both will be blue shifted. These three observers will agree on simultaneity (since they are all at rest wrt the train), but they will disagree on the Doppler shift.
 
  • #4
Nickelodeon said:
Am i right in thinking that relativistic simultaneity explanations tend not to mention the fact that one of the ‘simultaneous’ events may well be red shifted and the other blue shifted and by analysing wavelengths you could presumably work out whether the event was in reality simultanous or not.
Look at it this way. There are two light sources. One is 1 light sec from you and stationary with respect to you and the other is coming towards you at some high fraction of c. When the moving source passes the stationary source, both emit a light pulse. Both light pulses leave at the same moment, and they both travel the same distance to reach you and at the same speed. The fact that you will see the pulse coming from the moving source as blue-shifted has no bearing on this.
put other pair of sources 1 light sec away in the opposite direction with the moving one traveling in the same direction as the first moving source was. Thus when it passes the second stationary source it is moving away from you and you will see its flash as being red-shifted. If both of these sources flash the moment they pass each other you get a similar situation as above. If you, standing half way between the sources when they flash see all four flashes simultaneously, you can conclude that all four where emitted simultaneously. It will not matter that you saw 2 non-shifted flashes, 1 blue shifted flash, and 1 red shifted flash. They all arrived together and they all left from the same distance from you, traveling at the same speed.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #5
Thanks for your responses. I was thinking that two objects were stationary with respect to each other but a long way apart. Me, the observer, did a fly by leaving the first behind as i approached the second at nearly c. An event was scheduled simultaneous on both objects. In this scenario i thought if the red shift matched the blue shift then that would confirm simultaneity.
 
  • #6
You can confirm simultaneity in whatever frame the events were scheduled to occur simultaneously (Edit: although simple arrival times ought to be enough - the Doppler shift just tells you that you were moving, with respect to the sources). But that doesn't mean anything other than that they were simultaneous in that frame. Certainly you'll see the light coming from in front of you blue shifted and from behind red shifted, but again, all this tells you is that you're moving relative to the sources. It doesn't make the shared rest frame of the sources "more real".
 
Last edited:

Related to Relativity of Simultaneity: Analyzing Wavelengths

1. What is the theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity is a fundamental concept in physics that was first proposed by Albert Einstein. It states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion, and that the speed of light is constant for all observers regardless of their relative motion.

2. What is the relativity of simultaneity?

The relativity of simultaneity is a concept within the theory of relativity that states that the perception of simultaneous events can differ between observers depending on their relative motion. This means that what one observer perceives as simultaneous may not be perceived as simultaneous by another observer.

3. How does the relativity of simultaneity impact the perception of time?

The relativity of simultaneity has a direct impact on the perception of time, as it shows that time is relative and can be perceived differently by different observers. This means that what one observer perceives as a certain amount of time may be perceived as a different amount of time by another observer, depending on their relative motion.

4. What is the significance of analyzing wavelengths in relation to the relativity of simultaneity?

Analyzing wavelengths is important in understanding the relativity of simultaneity because it helps to demonstrate how the perception of time and space can differ between observers. By analyzing the wavelengths of light, which are used to measure time and distance, we can see how the perception of these measurements can vary depending on an observer's relative motion.

5. How does the concept of relativity of simultaneity impact our understanding of the universe?

The concept of relativity of simultaneity has greatly impacted our understanding of the universe, as it has shown that time and space are not absolute, but rather relative to an observer's frame of reference. This has led to a better understanding of phenomena such as time dilation and length contraction, and has also helped to shape our understanding of the universe on a larger scale, such as the theory of the expanding universe.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
631
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
825
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
89
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
855
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
706
Back
Top