Ransomware Attacks and the Impact on Bitcoin's Legality

  • Thread starter Office_Shredder
  • Start date
In summary: These days it's a given that this kind of activity will happen, since it's been happening ever since people connected to the internet. In summary, people are panicking buying gasoline since the pipeline shut down which is causing stations to run out of fuel. A couple states declared emergencies, maybe just to keep gas stations from increasing their prices. It seems worrisome that a ransomware attack can kind of do this by accident.
  • #36
russ_watters said:
That's an interesting commentary on the underlying value of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin has been decrease in $US for some time. On Saturday, it was about $37800. On Monday morning, it hovered around $36 - $36.5k, then about $35.6k at 8pm EDT during Monday evening, and down to ~$34k by 10 pm. Since then the price has fluctuated between $31.4 and $33.8k. I don't think the Colonial ransom had much to do with it, but one would have to look at when they paid to see if there was a price spike, and what was going on yesterday when the DOJ announced the seizure of the Bitcoin ransom from the hacker's wallet.

One can only speculate on how much Colonial will recover. It would seem a drop in the bucket for them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Astronuc said:
I don't think the Colonial ransom had much to do with it, but one would have to look at when they paid to see if there was a price spike, and what was going on yesterday when the DOJ announced the seizure of the Bitcoin ransom from the hacker's wallet.
I do agree; bitcoin can fluctuate 10% while you go get another cup of coffee, and it doesn't necessarily mean anything. We'll see if there is a more real/significant impact.

The article is making the commentary that since Bitcoin's value is heavily based on its utility as pre-laundered dirty money, law enforcement action that overcomes that attribute lessens its value. I would tend to agree. Even worse, the FBI now has the Bitcoin. So not only can law enforcement trace the money, they can seize it. And what if Colonial doesn't get it back? If that becomes a normal thing, I think it is a huge problem for Bitcoin moving forward.

I've been surprised by Bitcoin's resilience (though not its volatility) for several years. I'm surprised the Treasury Department is allowing Bitcoin ATMs to be set up. I think Bitcoin is clearly illegal and its viability thus far has been based primarily on the government not taking it seriously enough to bother shutting it down. This action gives a vibe that the government may be paying more attention.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #38
I don't get why the attackers didn't use XMR which ensures a higher level of anonymity instead. Now news reports that the bitcoins have been retrieved by FBI through accessing the private key. I wonder how they did it.
 
  • #39
russ_watters said:
I think Bitcoin is clearly illegal
Breaking which law exactly?

I do agree that its value to the criminal underworld is lessened if they can be seized by a major world government.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top