Barbor's brief survey of the state of String Theory

In summary, Barbon's brief survey on the state of String Theory, given at the EPS-2003 Conference, is a concise and general overview of the subject. It focuses on current problems and results, with a not-too-technical style that may be useful for a wide audience of physicists. However, some may question the inclusion of the BPS phenomenon in his discussion, as it is not well-motivated by Barbon. Overall, it is considered a good introductory review by those with sufficient knowledge to assess it.
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
Barbon's brief survey of the state of String Theory

STRING THEORY
J.L.F. Barbon
Department of Physics, Theory Division, CERN Geneva

Abstract
"This is a rendering of a review talk on the state of String Theory, given at
the EPS-2003 Conference, intended for a wide audience of experimental and theoretical physicists. It emphasizes general ideas rather than technical aspects."

Remarkably concise for a survey paper, only 12 pages and 46 references.
Focuses on the most salient current problems and results. General not-too-technical style. May provide a useful largescale map to the subject. Might be worth discussing. How good a review is it, if someone has the knowledge to make such an assessment? Is there an important part of the picture that Barbon left out?

http://arxiv.org./hep-th/0404188
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It does seem a very good intro. I have been working on his section 1, and the only mystery I need cleared up is The BPS phenomenon. A lot of his development is conditioned on BPS states and he doesn't motivate them very well. Can anyone help?
 
  • #3


Barbon's brief survey of the state of String Theory provides a valuable overview of the current state of this complex and evolving field. As someone with knowledge of the subject, I find the review to be well-written and concise, offering a helpful map of the major ideas and developments in String Theory. However, I do think that there are some important aspects of the theory that could have been further explored or discussed in more detail. For example, while Barbon touches on the potential implications of String Theory for quantum gravity and the unification of forces, there could have been more discussion on the challenges and potential solutions in these areas. Additionally, the review could have delved into the ongoing debates and controversies within the field, such as the issue of testability and the multitude of competing theories within String Theory. Overall, Barbon's survey is a valuable resource for those looking to gain a general understanding of String Theory, but it should not be considered a comprehensive or exhaustive review.
 

1. What is String Theory?

String Theory is a theoretical framework in physics that seeks to explain the fundamental nature of particles and their interactions. It proposes that particles, such as electrons and quarks, are not point-like objects, but rather tiny, vibrating strings. These strings can vibrate at different frequencies, giving rise to different particles and their properties.

2. Who developed String Theory?

String Theory was first proposed in the late 1960s by physicists Gabriele Veneziano, Leonard Susskind, and Yoichiro Nambu. However, it was further developed and popularized by physicists Michael Green, John Schwarz, and Edward Witten in the 1980s.

3. What is the current state of String Theory?

String Theory is still a very active area of research in theoretical physics. While it has not yet been proven experimentally, it has made significant progress in explaining many fundamental aspects of the universe, such as the unification of all known forces and the existence of gravity. However, it also faces challenges, such as the lack of experimental evidence and the existence of multiple competing versions of the theory.

4. How does String Theory differ from other theories in physics?

String Theory differs from other theories in physics, such as Quantum Field Theory and General Relativity, in its attempt to unify all known forces and particles into one framework. It also introduces the idea of extra dimensions beyond the three spatial dimensions we experience in our everyday lives. Additionally, unlike other theories, String Theory does not have a definitive mathematical formulation and is still being actively researched and developed.

5. Is String Theory testable?

Currently, String Theory is not testable in the traditional sense, as it has not yet made any predictions that can be experimentally verified. However, there are ongoing efforts to test aspects of String Theory, such as looking for evidence of extra dimensions or studying the behavior of particles at high energies. Additionally, there are some promising avenues for testing the theory in the future, such as through advancements in particle colliders and cosmological observations.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
41
Views
12K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top