- #1
swampwiz
- 571
- 83
https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/31131486_10155149285526260_4418766605865975808_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=53840620f886c5dab249cc2a8ff1010b&oe=5B4E8CA6
What is your answer and why?swampwiz said:https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/31131486_10155149285526260_4418766605865975808_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=53840620f886c5dab249cc2a8ff1010b&oe=5B4E8CA6
russ_watters said:What is your answer and why?
swampwiz said:I think that if anything, A gets hit, but the stone could roll all the way through (besides, A could duck). I'm presuming that the notch fits perfectly over D, and there would be only horizontal momentum going to the seesaw, and with the other stone being heavier (i.e., no notch), it would not crush C, and would vault over the other stone (because of the kinetic energy), clearing B as well.
'E' is a hypothetical person or character used in this quiz question. They do not represent a specific individual.
No, this question is meant to be a hypothetical scenario that prompts critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
The stone in this question is a symbolic object used to represent a potential danger or moral dilemma.
There is no definitive correct answer to this question, as it is meant to provoke thought and discussion rather than have a single, definitive solution.
The purpose of including this question in a quiz or test is to test critical thinking skills and the ability to analyze and respond to hypothetical scenarios.