Question regarding the three polarizer paradox

In summary: Ok, but that is what is predicted classically. There is nothing inherent in Maxwell’s equations that forbids a passive device from changing the polarization of light.
  • #36
Demystifier said:
Well, it's always more fun to solve a straightforward problem when it is presented as a "paradox". At least to me. :smile:
That's probably true. It can bring out your argumentative side and makes you more determined to disprove the paradox. Everyone loves a Devil's Advocate.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Science news on Phys.org
  • #37
anorlunda said:
Can it be explained classically?

Yes, using Jones vectors. The 3-polarizer setup is a very useful (and classical) way to demonstrate the behavior of spin-polarized atoms in magnetic fields. The Pauli spin matrices serve double-duty as Hermitian polarization operators.

The central concept common to both is 'change of basis states'.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and anorlunda

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
940
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
52
Views
1K
  • Optics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
729
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
96
Views
4K
Back
Top