Question on many world interpretation of Quantum Theory

In summary: Feynman's lectures, The Character of Physical Law, is a great place to start. Also, David Albert's "Quantum Mechanics and Experience" is helpful. In summary, the many-world theory suggests that every second the universe branches into multiple universes and this process continues exponentially. However, this does not mean that there are an infinite number of copies of a person at any given time. The flaw in the argument presented is that it assumes people can randomly appear at any age, when in reality, people age from zero and their existence is predetermined. The many-world theory may still be true, but this argument does not accurately represent it. To better understand this concept, it is recommended to read works by Hugh Everett, John Wheeler,
  • #1
Sajid
1
0
TL;DR Summary
I argue that many-world interpretation can not be true.
Every second the universe branches into 5000 universes and each of those 5000 universes branches into 5000 more after one more second.
Now, consider an 80 year old person, he has lived close to 80*365*24*60*60 seconds, which is 2.5 Billion seconds. So, in his life time, universe has branched 5000^2522,880,000 times, which is unfathomably and incomprehensibly large number, maybe close to infinity if there is one.
Which means close to his death he has infinite many copies of him in different worlds

Now, if you choose randomly a person's existence, shouldn’t he/she find himself to be in that time where almost infinite copies of him exist, which is close to his death. So, every person should find himself/herself close to his/her final years with almost a probability 1We clearly see that is not the case, so many-world theory can not be true.

What is the flaw in this argument?

Would appreciate your comments/response. Thanks.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes weirdoguy and PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Sajid said:
Every second the universe branches into 5000 universes and each of those 5000 universes branches into 5000 more after one more second.

Where are you getting these numbers from? Did you just make them up?

Sajid said:
unfathomably and incomprehensibly large number, maybe close to infinity if there is one

There is no such thing as "close to infinity". Every finite number is the same "distance from infinity" as every other one.

Sajid said:
if you choose randomly a person's existence

You can't. People don't get randomly assigned ages from 1 to 80 years. They each start at zero and age from there.

Sajid said:
What is the flaw in this argument?

There are at least four: the three I mention above plus the one @PeroK mentioned.
 
  • Like
Likes lomidrevo
  • #4
Your main flaw is believing that in the MWI you can start your existence at the age of 80 out of nothing. Where have you seen aged people appear out of nowhere?

In theory, there are a near infinite number of universes where you are already dead(due to car crashes, brain strokes, Covid, etc) but that doesn't imply you are destined to die now because of the sheer number of worlds that get spawned.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Suggest the OP read Hugh Everett and John Wheeler for a clearer understanding. Everett's biographer, Peter Bryne, also quite readable, places Everett in his proper Cold War setting in operations research while Everett's student, David Deutsch, explains wave mechanics in context.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
361
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
11
Views
680
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
944
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
4
Views
328
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top