Question about Hawking radiation in BH

In summary, Hawking's theory of black hole radiation suggests that black holes can lose energy through the absorption of particles created at the event horizon. However, due to the large amount of matter and energy that black holes absorb from the rest of the universe, the effect of Hawking radiation is relatively small and black holes are expected to increase in mass over time. This is because the temperature of a black hole must be higher than its surroundings for it to lose energy through radiation. Therefore, in most cases, the amount of energy absorbed by black holes is greater than the amount of energy lost through Hawking radiation.
  • #1
jnorman
316
0
i have read about Hawking's theory of BH radiation based on the idea of spontaneous particle pair creation at the EH wherein, on occasion, one of the particles is absorbed by the BH while the other escapes to become real. since the one which is absorbed is always of negative energy (whatever that means), the mass of the BH is reduced, and over time, hawking theorizes that the BH would eventually disappear.

assuming hawking is correct and this mechanism does indeed occur, it seems to me that the effect is rather small. and since every BH in existence is constatnly bombarded with enormous numbers of photons from elsewhere in the universe, which add energy/mass to the BH, it seems that even with the small reduction in mass due to hawking radiation, the BH would always increase in total mass over time.

am i missing something or misunderstanding hawking theory in some way, or did hawking consider this in his theory (ie, the radiation is greater than the amount of energy entering the BH due to absorbption of photons)? or am i correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
jnorman said:
did hawking consider this in his theory (ie, the radiation is greater than the amount of energy entering the BH due to absorbption of photons)?

Yes. What Hawking's theories says is that the BH will lose energy, on net, if the amount it radiates due to Hawking's mechanism is greater than the amount it absorbs due to radiation and matter from the rest of the universe falling into the hole. You are correct that, for a black hole of any significant size in our current universe, the energy radiated by Hawking's mechanism is far, far smaller than the amount being absorbed. The easiest way to see this is to look at Hawking's formula for the temperature of a black hole:

[tex]T = \frac{\hbar c^{3}}{8 \pi G M k_{B}}[/tex]

where [itex]\hbar[/itex] is Planck's constant divided by [itex]2 \pi[/itex], [itex]c[/itex] is the speed of light, [itex]G[/itex] is Newton's gravitational constant, [itex]M[/itex] is the mass of the hole, and [itex]k_{B}[/itex] is Boltzmann's constant. By simple thermodynamics, a black hole can only lose energy due to radiation if its temperature is higher than the temperature of its surroundings. If you run the numbers, a black hole with a mass of about 10^23 kg would have a temperature the same as the CMBR (2.7 K). That's roughly the mass of the Moon, which is well under the size of any black hole we expect to find out there; so any black hole we would reasonably expect to see would be colder than its surroundings and would be gaining energy.
 

Related to Question about Hawking radiation in BH

What is Hawking radiation?

Hawking radiation is a theoretical concept proposed by physicist Stephen Hawking. It suggests that black holes emit radiation due to quantum effects near the event horizon.

How does Hawking radiation affect black holes?

Hawking radiation causes black holes to lose mass over time, eventually leading to their evaporation. This is because the radiation carries away energy, causing the black hole to shrink.

Can Hawking radiation be observed?

No, Hawking radiation is extremely weak and difficult to detect. It has not been directly observed, but there is evidence of its effects on black holes.

What is the relationship between Hawking radiation and the event horizon?

The event horizon is the point of no return for objects entering a black hole. Hawking radiation is thought to originate from just outside the event horizon, where quantum effects are strongest.

Is Hawking radiation a proven phenomenon?

Hawking radiation is a well-accepted theory, but it has not been experimentally proven yet. Scientists are still studying and researching this concept to better understand its implications on black holes and the universe.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
146
Views
9K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top