Question about Coloumb's law notation and math in two different textbooks

  • #1
Selectron09
20
3
TL;DR Summary
Trying to understand mathematically how Jackson Classical Electrodynamics and Griffiths both describe coloumb's law equation
I am currently taking Electricity and Magnetism I for Graduate school and we are of course using Jackson Classical Electrodynamics 3e. I am used to Griffiths from undergrad and intro physics in that they describe it:
1694274144420.png


But Jackson modifies the notation to include a cube of the magnitude in the denominator:
1694274419944.png


I have tried to wrap my head around it. My professor just said it makes it "less mathematically akward" which is fine. Can someone take me stepwise line by line why these two are the same? I would really appreciate it. I want to be sure that I am getting used to the notation early of Jackson as I hear that's the trickiest part. It's not "new" physics!
 

Attachments

  • 1694273807045.png
    1694273807045.png
    19.9 KB · Views: 42
  • 1694274310407.png
    1694274310407.png
    19.1 KB · Views: 39
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Of course, Jackson has it in the clearest way. It's just giving the force between two point charges at given positions. Of course it's the same as in Griffiths's book. You only have to look up the definition of ##\vec{r}##. That becomes clear by rewriting the Jackson formula in the following way
$$\vec{F}=\frac{k q_1 q_2}{|\vec{x}_1-\vec{x}_2|^2} \frac{\vec{x}_1-\vec{x}_2}{|\vec{x}_1-\vec{x}_2} \equiv \frac{k q_1 q_2}{r^2} \hat{r},$$
where ##\vec{r}=vec{x}_1-\vec{x}_2## and ##\hat{r}=\vec{r}/|\vec{r}|##.

I'd also have written ##\vec{F}_1## for the force, because it's the force on charge 1 due to the presence of charge 2. Of course, you get ##\vec{F}_2=-\vec{F}_1## as it should be for static fields.
 
  • Like
Likes Selectron09
  • #3
Thankyou very much. That was amazingly helpful and gets me on the right track now as I continue through the reading. Much gratitude and I shall not hesitate to come back again after I've struggled through it.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and vanhees71
  • #4
The form ##{\bf r}/r^3## is more convenient for taking vector derivatives like grad, div, curl.
 
  • #5
You can also work in, e.g., spherical coordinates. Then you work with vector components wrt. the according (position-dependent) vectors ##\vec{e}_r##, ##\vec{e}_{\vartheta}##, and ##\vec{e}_{\varphi}##.
 

Similar threads

  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
9
Views
540
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
19
Views
979
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
985
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top